Trump is CREATING a deep state.

You made it all up.

you like throwing a tired shopworn righ wing cliche (“deep state”) around.

But when asked to define the imaginary “deep state”, you won’t answer the question.

instead, you shout empty and false nonsense about Liticia James and the Russian-Trump connection.

So, what is the ‘deep state”?
I just gave you specific examples and specific names.
The American People saw what cornpop and the leftists did to President Trump and they resoundingly rejected it.
Here are some more numbers for you 312>226
The American People saw that bite me and cackles were the deep state and voted accordingly.
And when I give you specifics you get triggered.
I find you to be shallow and pedantic.
 
So no, you cannot explain what 18 IGs Trump fired without reason have to do with his prosecutions.

So instead you bait and switch to another arument. But lets just note, that your prior argument has now been conclusively shown to be bullshit.


Now why your new argument is bs:

1. What I said wasn't about administration being ABLE to shamelessly install loyalists at every level, only that it's a very BAD PRECEDENT, which rewards reloving-door tribalism instead of experienced professionalism.

This is a turn for the worse for our government and it's ability to function well and reasonably transparently in the long term.

2. There is a specific Congressional law regulating President's firing of IG's and it required him to give Congress 30 days notice with specific reasons for firings. As previously ruled by courts, Congress has such oversight and consent powers over watchdog positions. By firing all those IG indescrimately and immediately, Trump blatantly violated that law.
The President can fire the i.g.s if he or she wants to. End of discussion. You are the one who brought up i.g.s and I explained it to you.
There was no bait and switch. I answered your questions.
You weren't even asking questions, you were ranting and raving about your feelings.
What don't you get about the deep state?
The American People saw what bite me and cackles did with censorship (covid shots) and they saw the lawfare i.e jack smith, alvin bragg, etc. Ya know, THE DEEP STATE!
They voted against it.
You have to learn to accept that ok.
Lashing out and lieing is not going to help you.
It only makes things worse.
And Again, about the firings.
It is up to President Trump ( Executive Branch)
I.G.s are under the executive branch.
It is not up to some judge (Judicial Branch)
Do you understand separation of powers?
Why do I have to keep explaining these simple concepts to you.
Maybe you should take an on line civics class.
 
The President can fire the i.g.s if he or she wants to. End of discussion.

What part of LAW SAYS OTHERWISE do you not get?

There is a law that says that Trump had to submit reason for the firing 30 days in advance.

Seperation of powers questions are settled IN COURT and court ruled that YES Congress has broad oversight powers vested by the Constitution and additionally consent powers for these types of positions.


Take your "end of discussion" and shove it back where you got it from.

 
Last edited:
What part of LAW SAYS OTHERWISE do you not get?

There is a law that says that Trump had to submit reason for the firing 30 days in advance.

Seperation of powers questions are settled IN COURT and court ruled that YES Congress has broad oversight powers vested by the Constitution and additionally consent powers for these types of positions.


Take your "end of discussion" and shove it back where you got it from.

Just because you say "law says otherwise" doesn't mean anything.
Elections have consequences, ok.
312>226. Those are numbers not your feelings.
It doesn't matter how much you hate President Trump. He is The President and it is his decision.
End of discussion 😎
 
Just because you say "law says otherwise" doesn't mean anything.
Elections have consequences, ok.

Wtf? Elections do not allow you to violate laws.

What are you smoking?

If a Democrat gets in power next time around you will also say that laws don't apply? :cuckoo: :cuckoo:
 
When did democrats offer a government employee buyout with the published intention of replacing them all with party loyalists?
Why buyout known Democrat party loyalists to replace them with unknown party loyalists?

That wouldn't make any sense, even to a Democrat.
 
I just gave you specific examples and specific names.
The American People saw what cornpop and the leftists did to President Trump and they resoundingly rejected it.
Here are some more numbers for you 312>226
The American People saw that bite me and cackles were the deep state and voted accordingly.
And when I give you specifics you get triggered.
I find you to be shallow and pedantic.

No, you did not.

you just paraded grievance against a couple ofindivoduls.

Sorry, but for years (along before anyone ever heard of James), right wingers have been flogging the idea that there is a secret sinister organization called the “deep state”. The myth claims itis, all knowing, all seeing, all powerful. And invisible.

When asked about that, you had no meaningful response at all.
 
Why buyout known Democrat party loyalists to replace them with unknown party loyalists?

That wouldn't make any sense, even to a Democrat.
Trump intends to hire only trump loyalists. The plan is outlined in project 2025, which he seems to be following.
 
No, you did not.

you just paraded grievance against a couple ofindivoduls.

Sorry, but for years (along before anyone ever heard of James), right wingers have been flogging the idea that there is a secret sinister organization called the “deep state”. The myth claims itis, all knowing, all seeing, all powerful. And invisible.

When asked about that, you had no meaningful response at all.
With the Internet and social media the world is getting smaller. Politicians are finding it more and more difficult to lie to The American People.
I gave you specifics whether you can except that or not.
Again, how many times do I have to explain this to you.
The American People saw the corruption, censorship and lawfare of the left and the cornpop administration.
Your all knowing, all seeing all powerful theory is just some nonsense you came up with in your head. You just keep changing directions with your thinking and you keep spouting off incoherently at this point.
At this point you really have no point. Just more unhinged ranting.
Maybe you should sit the next few rounds out and regroup.
 
Trump intends to hire only trump loyalists. The plan is outlined in project 2025, which he seems to be following.
Every administration tries to hire loyalists, lunatic.

Why would you try to hire folks that would work against you?
 
Wtf? Elections do not allow you to violate laws.

What are you smoking?

If a Democrat gets in power next time around you will also say that laws don't apply? :cuckoo: :cuckoo:
Your feelings are not reality.
You seem to think that just because you hate President Trump that somehow changes reality.
It is up to the President, and he can fire i.g.s if he or she wants to.
You can have as many hissy fits as you want.
It doesn't change reality.
You seem to be unhinged.
Maybe breath into a paper bag.
 
Your feelings are not reality.
You seem to think that just because you hate President Trump that somehow changes reality.
It is up to the President, and he can fire i.g.s if he or she wants to.
You can have as many hissy fits as you want.
It doesn't change reality.
You seem to be unhinged.
Maybe breath into a paper bag.

Again deflection, again misdirection.

What you’ve quoted talked about how winning an election does not give any right to break laws.

Read your reply again and tell me if you’ve managed to address even a word of that.

The law is that Trump has to give Congress reasons for firings of IGs 30days before.

You saying that Trump doesn’t have to follow law because he won election is a stupid, ludicrous argument.
 
Trump intends to hire only trump loyalists. The plan is outlined in project 2025, which he seems to be following.
Link to Trump administration statements that they are only hiring Trump loyalists?
 
Again deflection, again misdirection.

What you’ve quoted talked about how winning an election does not give any right to break laws.

Read your reply again and tell me if you’ve managed to address even a word of that.

The law is that Trump has to give Congress reasons for firings of IGs 30days before.

You saying that Trump doesn’t have to follow law because he won election is a stupid, ludicrous argument.
President Trump can fire i.g.s if he wants to.
He, as The President can do that.
I am addressing your questions.
You just don't like it .
What law is he breaking. Give me the statue numbers.
If you honestly feel that President broke the law call the police.
 
Trump has long complained about what he called the deep state. He thinks the deep state is a wide bureaucracy within the federal government who, on the orders of some anonymous person, are working to prevent him from succeeding because they just don't like trump. He claims any pushback he receives is purely personal and has nothing to do with their job requirements or what is good for the country. If social media is an accurate indicator, rump's offer to buy out current employees with the stated purpose of replacing them with trump loyalists is backfiring on him. Large numbers of government employees are posting that they are refusing to take the buyout and are staying for the specific purpose of interfering with trump's policies as much as possible. What trump has long feared is becoming real, and it's all because of his overreach.
Congratulations, you've just defined the deep state (without realizing it) A group of leftists hell bent on holding onto their jobs and pushing Marxism. Trump's appointees, being conservatives, would obviously not be deep staters by this definition.
 
Congratulations, you've just defined the deep state (without realizing it) A group of leftists hell bent on holding onto their jobs and pushing Marxism. Trump's appointees, being conservatives, would obviously not be deep staters by this definition.
Nort pushing Marxism but opposing trump. Isn't that what The OP says?
 
Trump has long complained about what he called the deep state. He thinks the deep state is a wide bureaucracy within the federal government who, on the orders of some anonymous person, are working to prevent him from succeeding because they just don't like trump. He claims any pushback he receives is purely personal and has nothing to do with their job requirements or what is good for the country. If social media is an accurate indicator, rump's offer to buy out current employees with the stated purpose of replacing them with trump loyalists is backfiring on him. Large numbers of government employees are posting that they are refusing to take the buyout and are staying for the specific purpose of interfering with trump's policies as much as possible. What trump has long feared is becoming real, and it's all because of his overreach.
If they violate the president's orders they get fired for cause, which will make them wish they'd taken the buyout.
 
Trump is not project 2025.

The authors of project 2025 are clearly influenced by Trump, not the other way around.
Trump's actions mirror Project 2025.
Trump is not project 2025.

The authors of project 2025 are clearly influenced by Trump, not the other way around.
Trump is project 2025. He's following it's instructions
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom