Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,438
- 2,290
Yes. Second hand information is when you say that someone told you that someone told them something. That’s exactly what you’re claiming happened here.You can't get much more of a stretch than that. Shokin was told directly when he was fired, that it was because of his refusal to get off the back of Hunter and Burisma. He didn't guess it, he didn't get that second or third hand. It was the reason he was fired.
If Poroshenko fired him for “refusal to get off the back of Hunter and Burisma”, then you have a problem with Poroshenko, not Biden.
If you are claiming Biden told Poroshenko that Shokin needs to get off the back of Hunter and Burisma, then that definitely makes it second hand information and therefore hearsay.
So which is it?
You are really reaching this morning. You ran out of ammo a long time ago.
Biden told Poroshenko to fire Shokin because of Hunter. Porshenko obeyed Biden and did just that. Do you know what second hand information is????
So why is that permissible all of a sudden?
Biden couldn't fire Shokin himself. He has no authority in that country. You are really reaching this morning. Poroshanko fired Shokin himself, not had somebody else do it and explain why.
I understand.
I just want you to admit that you’re relying on hearsay and second hand information.
That's not second hand information. Biden told Poroshanko directly to fire Shokin. Poroshanko directly told Shokin he was fired and why. Biden had no authority to fire Shokin himself.