Trump guilty of battery and defamation of E Jean Carroll

[Road Runner]

Fake news? Did you miss the news? The man you love was held liable for sexual abusing a woman.

Without evidence,.. by a New York jury,... who hates Trump.

 

[JimH52]

You seem to forget in a civil trial, all that's needed is a preponderance of evidence.

And the vote was unanimous. trump is a slug.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Without evidence,.. by a New York jury,... who hates Trump.

Can you list the names of the jury members who hate trump?

How did you get access to all the testimony and evidence the jury has access too?

 

[Foul Owl]

I see the OP is uneducated to the point he doesn't fully understand the difference between "guilty" and "liable."

 

[MagicMike]

LOL. Will you still feel that way if the case is appealed and Trump wins on appeal?

What is his track record on these appeals?
LOL

 

[L.K.Eder]

Can you list the names of the jury members who hate trump?

How did you get access to all the testimony and evidence the jury has access too?

i know one jury member listened eagerly to tim pool, and considered this balanced. lol.

 

[MagicMike]

I see the OP is uneducated to the point he doesn't fully understand the difference between "guilty" and "liable."

There really isn't a difference.
OJ Simpson was "liable" as well.

 

[Catsnmeters]

i know one jury member listened eagerly to tim pool, and considered this balanced. lol.

Who was it?

 

[L.K.Eder]

Who was it?

juror no. 77.

 

[Ralph Norton]

There really isn't a difference.
OJ Simpson was "liable" as well.

There absolutely is a difference: if your kid vandalizes something, you could be liable - but you aren't guilty.
Capisce?

 

[Catsnmeters]

juror no. 77.

Ahh this person.

Looks like Trump's lawyer has no issue.

"Tacopina argued in his eight-page filing that jurors can’t be dismissed purely because of their political affiliation. Rather, he said, dismissal is warranted when a juror’s life experience align closely with the issues they’re expected to decide during the trial. He argued extensively that a juror’s choice of media diet — like Tim Pool’s podcast — does not automatically mean the juror subscribes to the same political views.

“Under the plaintiff’s logic, police officers cannot serve on criminal cases, or jurors interested in women’s rights issues cannot serve on sex discrimination cases,” Tacopina wrote. “The law does not permit such excusals based on such broad judgments about jurors’ ability to serve fairly.”

Trump lawyer rejected claim that juror’s political affiliation signified bias

A newly unsealed filing in the E. Jean Carroll case reveals how Trump successfully kept a listener of a far-right podcast on the jury.

www.politico.com

 

[L.K.Eder]

Ahh this person.

Looks like Trump's lawyer has no issue.

"Tacopina argued in his eight-page filing that jurors can’t be dismissed purely because of their political affiliation. Rather, he said, dismissal is warranted when a juror’s life experience align closely with the issues they’re expected to decide during the trial. He argued extensively that a juror’s choice of media diet — like Tim Pool’s podcast — does not automatically mean the juror subscribes to the same political views.

“Under the plaintiff’s logic, police officers cannot serve on criminal cases, or jurors interested in women’s rights issues cannot serve on sex discrimination cases,” Tacopina wrote. “The law does not permit such excusals based on such broad judgments about jurors’ ability to serve fairly.”

Trump lawyer rejected claim that juror’s political affiliation signified bias

A newly unsealed filing in the E. Jean Carroll case reveals how Trump successfully kept a listener of a far-right podcast on the jury.

www.politico.com

he had no issue until even juror 77 was convinced that trump sexually abused carroll. then the jury was no longer fair. hahahahaha

 

[White 6]

Oops forgot to answer airplanemechanic's quote in this post and the answer is no about going on and on about Hillary.





Some chicks claiming that Trump sexually abused them is evidence?

Must have had something to do it. You'd have to query the jury, if you actually give a damn. With his history, it sounds like something he would think he could do, but I wasn't on the jury and only have read about it.

 

[MagicMike]

There absolutely is a difference: if your kid vandalizes something, you could be liable - but you aren't guilty.
Capisce?

Given Trump's confessions to this very crime is it at least reasonable to presume he is guilty of what his accusers say he did?
What would your logical mind lead you to believe?
Is it more probable that he did or that he didn't.
Be honest.

 

[Faun]

That's ridiculous. The democrats really can get away with everything and anything.

 

[Faun]

Without evidence,.. by a New York jury,... who hates Trump.

List the jurors and their political leanings or you're just making shit up again. Just like you did about election fraud in Georgia.

 

[BackAgain]

Given Trump's confessions to this very crime is it at least reasonable to presume he is guilty of what his accusers say he did?

A denial isn’t a confession, you dipshit.

What would your logical mind lead you to believe?
Is it more probable that he did or that he didn't.
Be honest.

Don’t speak of “logical minds.” You clearly have no handle on that kind of thing, MuddledMike.

 

[White 6]

Trump's good name doesn't mean nothing right ? Gotta believe the woman no matter what eh ? What a set up.

Nothing in those comments were out of line or untrue, otherwise if one is talking in an historical context concerning the culture's within America that have went on, go on, and still go on in America, and in this world to date. So speaking facts is interpreted as ohhhhhhhhhh we gotcha now in a scam hearing eh ? A booger could have fallen out of Trump's nose, and they would have scarfed it up quickly or ran with it. They were just that desperate.

Don't give me that. He hasn't had a good name in many years, going back to the draft dodging days.

 

[Independent thinker]

What is his track record on these appeals?
LOL

I see you dodged the question. No surprise.

 

[Ralph Norton]

Given Trump's confessions to this very crime is it at least reasonable to presume he is guilty of what his accusers say he did?
What would your logical mind lead you to believe?
Is it more probable that he did or that he didn't.
Be honest.

Irrelevant - we were talking about "guilty" in the legal sense.
I don't know what happened in that store 25 years ago; neither do you.