E. Jean Carroll is $5M richer

[Clipper]

Or, she'll be forced to produce evidence....which she won't have..

She produced enough to nail his ass. Btw, the judge agreed with the verdict.

 

[bdtex]

Trump loses appeal of E. Jean Carroll $5 million defamation verdict​

NEW YORK, Dec 30 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a $5 million verdict that E. Jean Carroll won against Donald Trump when a jury found the U.S. president-elect liable for sexually abusing and later defaming the former magazine columnist.
The decision was issued by a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan.
The May 2023 verdict stemmed from an incident around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan, where Carroll said Trump raped her, and an October 2022 Truth Social post where Trump denied Carroll's claim as a hoax.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-loses-appeal-e-jean-carroll-5-million-defamation-verdict-2024-12-30/

There's no doubt trump's court, if given the chance, will rule in his favor on appeal.

She has a second and larger judgement to collect on too.

 

[ThisIsMe]

She produced enough to nail his ass. Btw, the judge agreed with the verdict.

She didn't produce ANY evidence lol. She got a NY jury to buy her story based on no evidence. She convinced the jury that it's possible trump could have done it...not that he DID do it.

And what the judge says is irrelevant since he's not a part of the verdict. The fact that he came back with that bs statement that " what he did was considered, normally, was rape", should get him a nice lawsuit against him. His job is not to go behind the verdict of the jury and create public opinion.

He should be censured for that stunt.

 

[rightwinger]

She has a second and larger judgement to collect on too.

$83 million

 

[rightwinger]

She didn't produce ANY evidence lol. She got a NY jury to buy her story based on no evidence. She convinced the jury that it's possible trump could have done it...not that he DID do it.

And what the judge says is irrelevant since he's not a part of the verdict. The fact that he came back with that bs statement that " what he did was considered, normally, was rape", should get him a nice lawsuit against him. His job is not to go behind the verdict of the jury and create public opinion.

He should be censured for that stunt.

There was ample evidence of defamation

 

[wamose]

30 year old rape accusations? WTF?

 

[rightwinger]

30 year old rape accusations? WTF?

The defamation was recent

Trump doesn’t know how to STFU

 

[Mashmont]

There was ample evidence of defamation

So thank you for admitting there was zero evidence of any sexual assault.

 

[rightwinger]

So thank you for admitting there was zero evidence of any sexual assault.

The suit was about Trump defaming her

One defense of defamation is to prove what you said about her was true. In this case, it meant showing a sexual assault never happened.

Carroll described what happened in that dressing room.
She presented video of Trump claiming he likes to grab women by the pussy
She presented multiple women claiming under oath that Trump had done the same to them

Trump claimed “I never met her”
“She is not my type”
Both disproved in court.

The jury unanimously supported Carroll

 

[Mashmont]

The suit was about Trump defaming her

One defense of defamation is to prove what you said about her was true. In this case, it meant showing a sexual assault never happened.

Carroll described what happened in that dressing room.
She presented video of Trump claiming he likes to grab women by the pussy
She presented multiple women claiming under oath that Trump had done the same to them

Trump claimed “I never met her”
“She is not my type”
Both disproved in court.

The jury unanimously supported Carroll

Trump never claimed he liked to grab women. That's a lie.
Neither of Trump's claims were ever debunked.
Paid women will lie under oath at the drop of a hat. There is no way to disprove their claims of 30 years ago.

 

[rightwinger]

Trump never claimed he liked to grab women. That's a lie.
Neither of Trump's claims were ever debunked.
Paid women will lie under oath at the drop of a hat. There is no way to disprove their claims of 30 years ago.

Doesn’t matter what you think
The jury was convinced he is a pussy grabber

Trump claimed he never met her……A lie
Trump claimed she is not his type…..A lie

 

[Mashmont]

Doesn’t matter what you think
The jury was convinced he is a pussy grabber

The jury ruled based on a lie. Thanks for admitting it.

 

[0311]

The suit was about Trump defaming her

One defense of defamation is to prove what you said about her was true. In this case, it meant showing a sexual assault never happened.

Carroll described what happened in that dressing room.
She presented video of Trump claiming he likes to grab women by the pussy
She presented multiple women claiming under oath that Trump had done the same to them

Trump claimed “I never met her”
“She is not my type”
Both disproved in court.

The jury unanimously supported Carroll

It is difficult if damn near impossible to believe that each of over 20+ who Felon47 sexually inappropriate behavior is lying. It is a statistical improbability.

 

[rightwinger]

It is difficult if damn near impossible to believe that each of over 20+ who Felon47 sexually inappropriate behavior is lying. It is a statistical improbability.

Their stories were strikingly similar and demonstrated a pattern of abuse

 

[rightwinger]

The jury ruled based on a lie. Thanks for admitting it.

They did just that

It was proven that Trump had lied and ruined his credibility with the jury

 

[Mashmont]

They did just that

It was proven that Trump had lied and ruined his credibility with the jury

It was never demonstrated that Trump lied at any point. As I have already repeated. I realize you play this game to up your response count.

 

[rightwinger]

It was never demonstrated that Trump lied at any point. As I have already repeated. I realize you play this game to up your response count.

This picture destroyed Trumps credibility

When shown the picture and asked to identify who was in it, he pointed to E Jean Carroll and said “That is my wife Marla Maples”
So much for claiming “she is not my type”

It also showed Trump had met her

 

[Mashmont]

This picture destroyed Trumps credibility

View attachment 1061019

When shown the picture and asked to identify who was in it, he pointed to E Jean Carroll and said “That is my wife Marla Maples”
So much for claiming “she is not my type”

It also showed Trump had met her

This is a photo. No evidence she was with Trump, and no evidence he even knew who she was. If anything his referring to Marla Maples suggests he didn't know Carroll.

 

[ThisIsMe]

There was ample evidence of defamation

Not even a smidgen...sorry, but when someone accused you and has no proof, you dint lose your right to defend yourself.

 

[rightwinger]

Not even a smidgen...sorry, but when someone accused you and has no proof, you dint lose your right to defend yourself.

Trump could have denied the claim and it would not have been defamation
But he engaged in personal attacks which led to defamation