E. Jean Carroll is $5M richer

[Mashmont]

Two juries heard the same two stories

E Jean Carroll said Trump molested her in a dressing room
Trump denied he knew her

Guess who they believed ?

Leftwing activist juries. No Republicans. It was a sham trial that never should have been brought. A real jury would have laughed that silly woman out of court. There was ZERO evidence of the accusation. Nobody can name any.

Real justice was achieved at the ballot box. The American voters were the jury and acquitted the great man from these spurious charges. I'm just very pleased she won't see a dime.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Trump was sued not because he sexually assaulted Carroll. He was sued for defamation. Trump denying that he did it is not defamation. His personal attacks on Carroll were. $5 million Donnie

Trump was warned by the Judge to STFU. He was warned by his attorneys to STFU
But Trump continued with the personal attacks. Carroll was harassed and threatened by Trump supporters. She sued again and was awarded $83 million

Once again it is Trumps inability to control himself that cost him Bigly

This "Ms. Bergdorf Goodman" case is a complete con job ... I don't know this woman, have no idea who she is, other than it seems she got a picture of me many years ago, with her husband, shaking my hand on a reception line at a celebrity charity event. She completely made up a story that I met her at the doors of this crowded New York City Department Store and, within minutes, "swooned" her. It is a Hoax and a lie, just like all the other Hoaxes that have been played on me for the past seven years. ... She has no idea what day, what week, what month, what year, or what decade this so-called "event" supposedly took place. The reason she doesn't know is because it never happened, and she doesn't want to get caught up with details or facts that can be proven wrong. If you watch Anderson Cooper's interview with her, where she was promoting a really crummy book, you will see that it is a complete Scam. She changed her story from beginning to end, after the commercial break, to suit the purposes of CNN and Andy Cooper. ... For the record, E. Jean Carroll is not telling the truth, is a woman who I had nothing to do with, didn't know, and would have no interest in knowing her if I ever had the chance.[56]

Where is the defamation in there? He just denied ever having contact with her...she never proved it.


Also, please explain the 83M...where does she arrive her reputation being damaged to 40 times her net worth. Her net worth is only about 2M as it is... that violates the 8th ammendment.

 

[ThisIsMe]

A criminal charge requires beyond a reasonable doubt. Civil lawsuit requires a preponderance of evidence.
For defamation, Trumps defense claimed Trump never met her and she was not his type.

Evidence the jury considered

Trump bragging he likes to grab women by the pussy
Other women testifying Trump had done the same to them
Carroll testifying what happened and friends testifying she had told them after it happened

The Jury believed Carroll and there was ample evidence of defamation by Trump

There was no proof he grabbed any of them women by the pussy, other than their unsubstantiated testimony.


Him saying he likes to grab women is not evidence that he actually DID grab anyone.

"Her friends" testified she told them...so if someone of trumps friends testify he didn't do it, that negates their testimony, right?

The Twitter post that carrols defense used for the defamation case actually admits the picture that he was in with Carol and her husband.

Maybe once biden is no longer in office, trump can invite Tara reade back to the US under protective order, and she too can sue biden, and win 5M...

Would you support that? Would you support her winning that case?

 

[Clipper]

Nah, he has to shell out 5M because a woman put on a good story (from TV no less) that a jury believed. No evidence of sexual assault was ever shown.

Hopefully he will run this up the chain, get it dismissed, and then, he should have an investigation started into the whole thing, and see how far up the ladder this goes. Sue her personally for 20 million and...10 years in prison. See how that works. Unless, of course, she can produce some evidence.

Let Trump sue. And when it goes to Discovery he'll shut his fat mouth & drop it.

 

[0311]

Let Trump sue. And when it goes to Discovery he'll shut his fat mouth & drop it.

That is fly in ointment. The person being has the right to see the documents the other side has.

 

[nobody_important]

Wishful thinking on your part

Your problem is that Trump actually did all those things and there are mountains of evidence against him.
Biggest shortfall is Trump does not know how to keep his mouth shut and his own statements are used against him.

He has not done well in a jury trial in many years.

This "Ms. Bergdorf Goodman" case is a complete con job ... I don't know this woman, have no idea who she is, other than it seems she got a picture of me many years ago, with her husband, shaking my hand on a reception line at a celebrity charity event. She completely made up a story that I met her at the doors of this crowded New York City Department Store and, within minutes, "swooned" her. It is a Hoax and a lie, just like all the other Hoaxes that have been played on me for the past seven years. ... She has no idea what day, what week, what month, what year, or what decade this so-called "event" supposedly took place. The reason she doesn't know is because it never happened, and she doesn't want to get caught up with details or facts that can be proven wrong. If you watch Anderson Cooper's interview with her, where she was promoting a really crummy book, you will see that it is a complete Scam. She changed her story from beginning to end, after the commercial break, to suit the purposes of CNN and Andy Cooper. ... For the record, E. Jean Carroll is not telling the truth, is a woman who I had nothing to do with, didn't know, and would have no interest in knowing her if I ever had the chance.[56]

Where is the defamation in there? He just denied ever having contact with her...she never proved it.


Also, please explain the 83M...where does she arrive her reputation being damaged to 40 times her net worth. Her net worth is only about 2M as it is... that violates the 8th ammendment.

she defamed him. i seem to see this "rightwinger" guy in every thread, as if his browser is pointed at this forum 24/7 while he shits in chamber pot. why does "rightwinger" keep posting even when hes always wrong? is "rightwinger" a bot?

 

[MarathonMike]

The case should act as a constant reminder of trump's moral degeneracy.

Like all the other law fare cases against Trump, this one is a reminder of the degradation of the American Department of Justice and it's lower courts.

 

[Dante]

This is a New York State Court

they are so dumb

 

[Dante]

No she isn't . The case is still being fought and appealed further. She hasn't collected the first 5 cents yet.

link to the appeal

 

[rightwinger]

And? Because he didn't remember meeting her, that means he raped her? Hell, even if he outright lied about meeting her..that still doesn't mean he raped her...

Jury believed Carroll and not Trump

 

[rightwinger]

Leftwing activist juries. No Republicans. It was a sham trial that never should have been brought. A real jury would have laughed that silly woman out of court. There was ZERO evidence of the accusation. Nobody can name any.

Real justice was achieved at the ballot box. The American voters were the jury and acquitted the great man from these spurious charges. I'm just very pleased she won't see a dime.

Blame Trump

Two juries heard Carrols story and Trumps denial
They didn’t believe Trump

But the case was about defamation not rape. Trump is allowed to deny it happened. But his personal attacks led to defamation.
Trump was warned by the judge and his own lawyers to STFU.
He kept spouting his mouth off and it cost him Bigly

 

[0311]

Jury believed Carroll and not Trump

It was a unanimous decision. The judge polled the jury and each of the jurors agreed Felon47 was liable for rape of E. Jean Carroll

 

[rightwinger]

It was a unanimous decision. The judge polled the jury and each of the jurors agreed Felon47 was liable for rape of E. Jean Carroll

No

Trump was liable for defamation……TWICE
He doesn’t know how to keep his mouth shut

 

[0311]

she defamed him.

NOT according to the jury. Right Winger very correct. The judge polled AFTER the verdicts were, and it clear because the jury was unanimous in their decision.

 

[0311]

No

Trump was liable for defamation……TWICE
He doesn’t know how to keep his mouth shut

Ain't that the truth.

 

[rightwinger]

Ain't that the truth.

$88 million in defamation
After $5 million, Trump did not get the message about attacking Carroll

How dare you tell Donald Trump what to do!
$83 million more Donnie, now will you STFU?

 

[Mashmont]

Blame Trump

Two juries heard Carrols story and Trumps denial
They didn’t believe Trump

But the case was about defamation not rape. Trump is allowed to deny it happened. But his personal attacks led to defamation.
Trump was warned by the judge and his own lawyers to STFU.
He kept spouting his mouth off and it cost him Bigly

Carroll hasn't seen a dime. Praise the Lord!

 

[rightwinger]

Carroll hasn't seen a dime. Praise the Lord!

Yea….Trump is like that
He will spend $10 million to appeal a $5 million judgement

But Trump will run out of appeals and then refuse to pay
Let Carroll go after his assets like they did with Rudy

 

[ThisIsMe]

Let Trump sue. And when it goes to Discovery he'll shut his fat mouth & drop it.

Or, she'll be forced to produce evidence....which she won't have..

 

[ThisIsMe]

Jury believed Carroll and not Trump

I understand that, and with any luck, true justice will prevail and all that will be overturned.