E. Jean Carroll is suing him in Manhattan federal court for battery over the alleged rape and for defamation over social media comments.
www.politico.com
This is a list of all the witnesses called by the defense. It goes from people who can corroborate some of the details of her account. How the store looked and why it is plausible that he was able to do what he did in what is in essence a public place. To a psychiatrist testifying to what he perceives as trauma stemming from sexual assault. To witnesses that are prepared to testify under oath that Carroll told them at the time. To other women who claim similar attacks by Trump, again under oath. To 3 days of Carroll testifying and being cross-examined
The evidence also included the tape were Trump says he does what he is accused of here. And a deposition in wich he doesn't just defends those statements but actually can't tell you if sexual assault by famous people is wrong.
In his defense Trump presented nothing. In fact he didn't even show up.
It took the jury 3 hours to reach a conclusion. A jury that included a juror that the lawyers for Carroll wanted to get rid of. Trump's lawyer said in court he was not biased and who the judge, who you guys claim was against Trump allowed to be on the jury. Not only that the judge even gave the opportunity for Trump to testify even AFTER both sides rested their cases. Something that is extremely unusual.
So when you guys say there was no evidence I scratch my head.