All that was required for "evidence" was for the jury to believe Carroll.

[MarathonMike]

This was the EXACT instructions the judge gave the jury in the Carroll case against Donald Trump. "Anything from a gentle but unwanted peck on the cheek to stabbing somebody with a knife could be battery for purposes of a civil case like this one," U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan told jurors at the start of the trial.

Yeah, so file this verdict under "C" for chicken shit like everything else the Democrats have cooked up over the last seven years. Hey, get out there and march with your pussy hats, you idiots!

 

[jillian]

This was the EXACT instructions the judge gave the jury in the Carroll case against Donald Trump. "Anything from a gentle but unwanted peck on the cheek to stabbing somebody with a knife could be battery for purposes of a civil case like this one," U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan told jurors at the start of the trial.

Yeah, so file this verdict under "C" for chicken shit like everything else the Democrats have cooked up over the last seven years. Hey, get out there and march with your pussy hats, you idiots!

That’s the way it works bubbalah BECAUSE there was no testimony disputing what she said.

Because Donald is an abusive pig

The man told you he grabs women by the genitals and that was what he admitted to.

When people tell you who they are believe them.

 

[playtime]

he confessed.

 

[toobfreak]

This was the EXACT instructions the judge gave the jury in the Carroll case against Donald Trump. "Anything from a gentle but unwanted peck on the cheek to stabbing somebody with a knife could be battery for purposes of a civil case like this one," U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan told jurors at the start of the trial.

Yeah, so file this verdict under "C" for chicken shit like everything else the Democrats have cooked up over the last seven years. Hey, get out there and march with your pussy hats, you idiots!

Just what I thought. No evidence. Another hostile NYC "get Trump" jury where Trump was guilty before the case even began.

The bitch will never see a dime from Trump.

 

[Blues Man]

Civil trials have different evidentiary rules.

All that is required is a preponderance of evidence for a jury to find for the plaintiff in a civil suit. And the verdict is not an indictment on criminal charges so there will be no crimes on record either.

 

[playtime]

Just what I thought.

you are incapable of thinking.

No evidence.

donny admitted to sexual assaulting women.

Another hostile NYC "get Trump" jury where Trump was guilty before the case even began.

^^^

The bitch will never see a dime from Trump.

he's gonna pay out bigley...

just like he did with his fraudulent 'university' case when he screwed his students.

& just like he had to pay out bigley when his fraudulent 'charity' was shuttered because he used it as his own personal pggy bank.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

All that was required for "evidence" was for the jury to believe Carroll.​

This is the reality that the collective Right has brought on itself.
The cost of doing nothing for decades. Time to pay up. This is just the beginning. You ain't seen NUTHIN yet.
Right now they're only going after Trump and a few top Republican dogs.
Soon they'll be at your door.

When a team of heavily armed govt storm troopers, MORE than happy to be enforcers come to your door you'll have two choices.....
1). Get on your knees and surrender
2). Die

Gosh. If only the Conservative Right hadn't been so weak and negligent all these decades.

 

[toobfreak]

you are incapable of thinking.

Right Petunia, that must be why I skipped four grades, taught astronomy and logic for extra credit and went to college on a state scholarship.

donny admitted to sexual assaulting women.

When? Where?

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Right Petunia, that must be why I skipped four grades, taught astronomy and logic for extra credit and went to college on a state scholarship.



When? Where?

With all those "smarts" surely you can see that Trump represents the Swamp ?

 

[AZrailwhale]

All that was required for "evidence" was for the jury to believe Carroll.​

This is the reality that the collective Right has brought on itself.
The cost of doing nothing for decades. Time to pay up. This is just the beginning. You ain't seen NUTHIN yet.
Right now they're only going after Trump and a few top Republican dogs.
Soon they'll be at your door.

When a team of heavily armed govt storm troopers, MORE than happy to be enforcers come to your door you'll have two choices.....
1). Get on your knees and surrender
2). Die

Gosh. If only the Conservative Right hadn't been so weak and negligent all these decades.

How about killing the storm troopers instead of dying. Of killing some of them while dying. There won't be many volunteers for stormtroopers when they know the citizens will shoot back.

 

[Oddball]

Civil trials have different evidentiary rules.

All that is required is a preponderance of evidence for a jury to find for the plaintiff in a civil suit. And the verdict is not an indictment on criminal charges so there will be no crimes on record either.

Except there was no fucking evedence, except the say-so of a woman who's cleary nuttier than a fruitcake.

 

[MarathonMike]

That’s the way it works bubbalah BECAUSE there was no testimony disputing what she said.

Because Donald is an abusive pig

The man told you he grabs women by the genitals and that was what he admitted to.

When people tell you who they are believe them.

Does your pussy hat still fit?

 

[Hellbilly]

You MAGA’s got your check books ready?
Uncle Donny needs your money.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

How about killing the storm troopers instead of dying. Of killing some of them while dying. There won't be many volunteers for stormtroopers when they know the citizens will shoot back.

Well now, that sounds bold and maybe brave over the internet but...
VERY FEW will have that courage when they actually arrive at the door, guns pointed.

"Everyone's got a plan till they get punched in the mouth"
Mike Tyson

I can assure you the vast majority will indeed drop to their knees.
We don't have courage and determination in this country like existed 50 years or more ago.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Except there was no fucking evedence, except the say-so of a woman who's cleary nuttier than a fruitcake.

Agreed.
But still the MFers are winning. She won and there are 30 more lined up ready to get another 5 million each
wtf?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Civil trials have different evidentiary rules.

All that is required is a preponderance of evidence for a jury to find for the plaintiff in a civil suit. And the verdict is not an indictment on criminal charges so there will be no crimes on record either.

True, but nevertheless if this was anyone other than Trump - it would have never seen a courtroom.
There was zero evidence of any kind. The woman couldn't even say what year it was, no witnesses and her description of what happened was vague and borderline bizarre.
It was a witchhunt, she will never get one cent, which everyone knows, but it was never about anything other than getting cameras on it.

 

[bodecea]

Just what I thought. No evidence. Another hostile NYC "get Trump" jury where Trump was guilty before the case even began.

The bitch will never see a dime from Trump.

MAGAts sure do love them some sex predators.

 

[dudmuck]

This was the EXACT instructions the judge gave the jury in the Carroll case against Donald Trump. "Anything from a gentle but unwanted peck on the cheek to stabbing somebody with a knife could be battery for purposes of a civil case like this one," U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan told jurors at the start of the trial.

Yeah, so file this verdict under "C" for chicken shit like everything else the Democrats have cooked up over the last seven years. Hey, get out there and march with your pussy hats, you idiots!

A jury listened to the testimony of three women who said Trump forced himself on them.
The access hollywood tapes were also evidence.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

True, but nevertheless if this was anyone other than Trump - it would have never seen a courtroom.
There was zero evidence of any kind. The woman couldn't even say what year it was, no witnesses and her description of what happened was vague and borderline bizarre.
It was a witchhunt, she will never get one cent, which everyone knows, but it was never about anything other than getting cameras on it.

Correct.

So doing nothing has indeed brought about REAL political persecution. It's here. In the USA.

And it's just the beginning. They are getting bolder and stronger and better entrenched.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Americans are in denial....but we as a nation are actually on track to become an authoritarian state.