- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,660
- 52,016
- 3,600
They put cardboard up on windows and did not let observers close enough to see a thing.Because none of the plaintiffs can produce enough evidence to convince a judge to issue a subpoena for them.
All they have is a fishing expedition, and the law doesn't work that way, you need real evidence to get your hands on official election records.Transparency? They let both parties witness and observe the entire election process. They could have raised any objections as they occurred. They had them conduct hand recounts in Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin. With the recounts showing no significant error, and no tabulation errors by the machines.Transparency is reason enough, and you know it. They are guilty.