Trump: “For those people who say they want peace, you can’t have peace if Iran has a nuclear weapon."

[Dragonlady]

That's rich, considering everything you seem to believe is a lie.

View attachment 1124963

You're projecting again.

Hamas can't do shit without money from Iran.....and Biden gave Iran billions.

$6 billion within a very short period right before the Oct 7th attack as a matter of fact.

Trump had Iran struggling for cash....and Biden bailed them out.

Every missile that rains down on Israel was paid for with our tax dollars.

Iran wouldn't be enriching uranium at all and they'd be at no risk of obtaining an NW if Trump hadn't torn up the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Iran signed. That deal wouldn't have expired until this year, so Trump gave Iran an 7 year window they would not otherwise have to had, to build a bomb

Biden did NOT "give Iran Billions", moron. Obama returned the government of Iran's money to the goverenment of Iran. That was THEIR money, that the USA froze in US bank accounts when Reagan was in office.

US courts ORDERED the Administration to return that money.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/inside-the-37-year-standoff-over-irans-frozen-u-s-dollars-1482956855

Posts Misrepresent Unfreezing of $16 Billion in Iranian Funds - FactCheck.org

A recent deal involving a prisoner swap and the extension of a Trump-era waiver have freed $16 billion in previously frozen Iranian funds. Social media posts distort the sources of the money to falsely claim "Joe Biden gave 16 billion to Iran." The Iranian money has been unfrozen with...

www.factcheck.org

 

[Mac-7]

Arguing with a liberal is like this:

Thats exactly what its like to argue with most liberals

 

[M14 Shooter]

Granada

Grenada. 1983.
It was an 8 day operation, not a war.
All you do is lie.

Has there every been a military build up in the world that hasn't lead to a war??

Reagan, 1981-1988.

 

[22lcidw]

you made up this claim and keep repeating it.

you have no evidence whatsoever, and you know it.

Her is a legitimate question or statement. If both sides get the same information on Iran, how do we end up with two different approaches? 45 years of this with Iran. It seems like a game that keeps us at war. No more troops on the ground. Either end this or get out.

 

[sealybobo]

All the clowns that want war with Russia are crying for the Iranian Mullahs.

Why do you want to take out the Mullahs? Who will replace them? Do you have a similar plan to the one you had invading Iraq? Tell me how you are going to do regime change?

 

[Nobody911]

Refreshing clarity from our Prez .


Trump: Regardless of Israel, Iran can’t have nukes.
“For those people who say they want peace, you can’t have peace if Iran has a nuclear weapon," said the U.S. president.
June 15, 2025.
U.S. President Donald Trump dismissed allegations that his support for Israel in its war against Iran was at odds with his “America First” commitment, stating that preventing Tehran from obtaining nuclear arms was a top U.S. priority.

“Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, very simple. Regardless—Israel or not Israel—Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb,” Trump told The Atlantic for an interview published on Saturday

Trump: Regardless of Israel, Iran can't have nukes

“For those people who say they want peace, you can’t have peace if Iran has a nuclear weapon," said the U.S. president.

www.jns.org

War is a racket. Iran could end up just like Iraq. Have the CIA and Mossad found WMDs in Iraq yet? Is there still no proof? Is it just propaganda? Why should I believe Trump or Netanyahu? Do they always tell the truth?

Israel and the United States have not provided conclusive public evidence that Iran currently possesses or is actively constructing a nuclear weapon, though they have presented intelligence and assessments indicating Iran is very close to weapons-grade uranium enrichment and has a history of nuclear weapons-related activities.

Key points from recent reports:

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran has amassed uranium enriched up to 60% purity, which is a technical step short of the 90% enrichment needed for weapons-grade material. Iran’s stockpile at this level could potentially be enough for about nine nuclear bombs if further enriched 15.

Israel claims its recent strikes targeted Iran’s "weaponization program" and nuclear facilities at Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow, aiming to delay or dismantle Iran’s nuclear weapons capability. Israeli officials say they have "concrete intelligence" that Iran was advancing toward developing a bomb, particularly at Isfahan 237.

U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed that while Iran has enriched uranium to unprecedented levels and expanded its nuclear program, it is not currently constructing a nuclear weapon and that Iran’s Supreme Leader has not authorized a nuclear weapons program since suspending it in 2003 18.

The IAEA has uncovered evidence from past investigations (up to 2009) of Iran’s nuclear activities relevant to weapons development, including a clandestine program called Project Amad, but has not confirmed current weaponization activities. The agency also noted Iran’s lack of cooperation in clarifying uranium particles found at undeclared sites, raising concerns about the peaceful nature of the program 16.

Satellite imagery and expert analysis suggest Israel’s recent strikes caused damage at some nuclear sites, especially Natanz, but the deeply buried Fordow facility remains largely intact. The full impact on Iran’s nuclear capabilities is still being assessed 24.

In summary, Israel and the U.S. point to Iran’s advanced uranium enrichment, past weaponization efforts, and intelligence on nuclear research to justify concerns and military actions, but no publicly released definitive proof of an active nuclear weapons program or completed bomb has been provided. The situation remains one of high tension and uncertainty, with the IAEA continuing to monitor Iran’s nuclear activities closely 1238.

sources :

1. Was Iran months away from producing a nuclear bomb?
2. https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/14/middleeast/iran-israel-nuclear-facilities-damage-impact-intl
3. Iran’s lies about its nuclear plans finally at an end
4. https://www.reuters.com/world/middl...o-far-appears-limited-experts-say-2025-06-13/
5. What To Know About Iran’s Nuclear Program After Israel’s Strikes
6. https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/13/middleeast/iran-nuclear-program-explainer-intl-dg
7. https://www.idf.il/en/mini-sites/id...r/information-on-the-iranian-nuclear-project/
8. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12106
9. https://www.dw.com/en/iran-israel-conflict-nuclear-weapons-donald-trump-iaea/a-72918689

 

[sealybobo]

All the clowns that want war with Russia are crying for the Iranian Mullahs.

We don't want to get involved with a war with Russia other than backing our ally who Russia is attacking. Send Ukraine lots of drones and weapons so they can defend themselves from Putin. Do you like Putin?

Is Iran invading someone? Threatening someone? You guys love to talk about WMD's and Iran's nuclear program. Why can't they have a nuke? India has one. Israel has one. Pakistan has them. Who else has one?

You want us to believe Iran wants to nuke Israel even though they know they'd get nuked right back.

And I'm sorry but you guys cry that Iran backs arabs when it comes to the west. Can you blame them? Have we been good to them? Biden tried tact but I guess you and Trump say we got to take out Iran. I don't really believe it's necessary but you're in power.

If I were a Senator and a Democrat I would not vote for it.

 

[M14 Shooter]

In summary, Israel and the U.S. point to Iran’s advanced uranium enrichment, past weaponization efforts, and intelligence on nuclear research to justify concerns and military actions, but no publicly released definitive proof of an active nuclear weapons program or completed bomb has been provided.

Why do you believe Israel needs to prove anything to you?

 

[sealybobo]

No, I mean the Peace President, TRUMP!.

Where did I side with Russia? Start there. And don't try to play that stupid, "Well, somebody else did and I just lumped you in with them because reasons" game.

So you agree we should support Ukraine and help them win this? You agree it would be a bad idea to let Putin win this war? You understand the fall out if that happens? You understand China is watching to see how the world is reacting. Because one day they're going to invade Taiwan?

How is Trump a peace president? He over reacts and sends in troops to an American protest. But said Jan 6 was a day of love.

You sir, are just an idiot. Side with Russia or not. Who gives a **** about YOU? I do lump you in with the other idiots. I know when I see HADIT I'm talking to a retard.

 

[mudwhistle]

Why do you want to take out the Mullahs? Who will replace them? Do you have a similar plan to the one you had invading Iraq? Tell me how you are going to do regime change?

We aren't doing anything.

Israel is.

They say that Iran was planning on turning over nukes to terrorists so they could set them off in Israel.

Instead of waiting for it to happen like your typical Democrat, they launched attacks on Iran to destroy their nuke capabilities.

They did the same thing to Iraq on a smaller scale decades ago.

 

[TimFitz]

No it doesent. Obama giving cash to Iran is a fact

it was their money, as your own link points out.

 

[Mac-7]

it was their money, as your own link points out.

Yeah, so?

This is nuclear proliferation by the world’s number one sponsor of terrorism not bean bag

From our point of view Iran spent the money in all the wrong places

 

[TimFitz]

We aren't doing anything.

Israel is.

They say that Iran was planning on turning over nukes to terrorists so they could set them off in Israel.

Instead of waiting for it to happen like your typical Democrat, they launched attacks on Iran to destroy their nuke capabilities.

They did the same thing to Iraq on a smaller scale decades ago.

Who are the imaginary “they” that “say” Iran is planning on turning over nukes it doesn’t have to terrorist groups?

Right wing podcasters? Clowns on X that you never heard of but believe anyway?

Trump started out the talks with his trademark bullying.

Iran responded by suggesting a return to the JCPOA that Trump unilaterally tore up in 2017.

(rafter Trump’s duplicity then, it’s surprising that Tehran hasn’t already acquired the bomb.

But Isreal doesn’t want any agreement at all.

So they took the ball out of Trump’s hands and started shooting.

 

[TimFitz]

Yeah, so?

This is nuclear proliferation by the world’s number one sponsor of terrorism not bean bag

From our point of view Iran spent the money in all the wrong places

You hav no idea what you’re talking about.

Are you dumb enough to believe that Iran is not a wealthy country with considerable resources.

 

[Mac-7]

Who are the imaginary “they” that “say” Iran is planning on turning over nukes it doesn’t have to terrorist groups?

Right wing podcasters? Clowns on X that you never heard of but believe anyway?

Trump started out the talks with his trademark bullying.

Iran responded by suggesting a return to the JCPOA that Trump unilaterally tore up in 2017.

(rafter Trump’s duplicity then, it’s surprising that Tehran hasn’t already acquired the bomb.

But Isreal doesn’t want any agreement at all.

So they took the ball out of Trump’s hands and started shooting.

I think the bearded mullahs would sign anything trump wants them to because Iran is getting its ass kicked

This is long overdue

 

[sealybobo]

We aren't doing anything.

Israel is.

They say that Iran was planning on turning over nukes to terrorists so they could set them off in Israel.

Instead of waiting for it to happen like your typical Democrat, they launched attacks on Iran to destroy their nuke capabilities.

They did the same thing to Iraq on a smaller scale decades ago.

They say? Who's they? You believe them? I don't.

You don't think this was coordinated between Israel and USA? Of course they planned this. Trump would meet with them and as he's meeting, Israel totally catches them off guard. Good cop bad cop. Ambush them like Trump did Zelensy. Must be a tactic used in the Art of the Deal.

And here we go again with your mushroom cloud threats.

• WMD: The Bush administration claimed that Iraq possessed WMD, including chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, and that Saddam Hussein intended to use them against the United States.
• Terrorism: They also asserted that Saddam Hussein's regime supported terrorism and had close ties to terrorist groups, including al-Qaeda. This link was used as a main reason for invading Iraq in 2003. The administration argued that Hussein was in league with al-Qaeda
• "My colleagues, every statement I make today is backed up by sources — solid sources," he said. "These are not assertions. What we're giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence."
• Our enemies would be no less willing -- in fact they would be eager -- to use a biological, or chemical, or a nuclear weapon.
  Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.

 

[sealybobo]

Why do you believe Israel needs to prove anything to you?

If they want to convince us to go to war with Iran, we need to see proof. Not Colon Powell getting up and lying to us.

 

[mudwhistle]

it was their money, as your own link points out.

Oh....so that excuses giving aid and comfort to our enemies.

Because it's THEIR money.

Only a retard buys that rubbish.

Only makes sense if you're a Jew-hating bastard.

 

[Godboy]

They say? Who's they? You believe them? I don't.

You don't think this was coordinated between Israel and USA? Of course they planned this. Trump would meet with them and as he's meeting, Israel totally catches them off guard. Good cop bad cop. Ambush them like Trump did Zelensy. Must be a tactic used in the Art of the Deal.

And here we go again with your mushroom cloud threats.

• WMD: The Bush administration claimed that Iraq possessed WMD, including chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, and that Saddam Hussein intended to use them against the United States.
• Terrorism: They also asserted that Saddam Hussein's regime supported terrorism and had close ties to terrorist groups, including al-Qaeda. This link was used as a main reason for invading Iraq in 2003. The administration argued that Hussein was in league with al-Qaeda
• "My colleagues, every statement I make today is backed up by sources — solid sources," he said. "These are not assertions. What we're giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence."
• Our enemies would be no less willing -- in fact they would be eager -- to use a biological, or chemical, or a nuclear weapon.
  Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.

You think Iran ISNT trying to get nukes? Dont point at Iraq and Bush, show me your proof of that absurd claim about Iran.

 

[hadit]

So you agree we should support Ukraine and help them win this? You agree it would be a bad idea to let Putin win this war? You understand the fall out if that happens? You understand China is watching to see how the world is reacting. Because one day they're going to invade Taiwan?

I asked where I supported Russia. Give with the quotes or admit you made it up and got caught in a weak argument. And remember I won't accept, "Well, somebody did".

How is Trump a peace president? He over reacts and sends in troops to an American protest. But said Jan 6 was a day of love.

He's the Peace President because he was the first in a long line of US presidents to initiate no new hostilities and brokered an historic peace agreement in the ME. He CERTAINLY deserved the Nobel far more than the last president to win one ever did.

You sir, are just an idiot. Side with Russia or not. Who gives a **** about YOU? I do lump you in with the other idiots. I know when I see HADIT I'm talking to a retard.

Ah, so you admit you just made it all up. Well, double down on the loss of credibility. You simply will get nowhere doing that except to be outed as a, shall we say, less than serious poster.