Trump claims presidents can declassify documents ‘even by thinking about it

[Stann]

Again no one is patting Putin on the back but they are not the USSR anymore nor are they a totalitarian people. The Russian people want to live in a Democratic Republic the same as us.....
I think the US is playing both sides here or at least the globalists who are now in charge of our country since the stolen election.

Putin will be eliminated soon, hopefully another dictator will not take over the country.

 

[Stann]

Norma reports.org protein shuts down Russia's Free press for reporting accurately on Ukraine March 9th., 2022. They only had one free press in the whole country, there were others at one time. They were systematically eliminated by the government.

I really need to proofread these things, I have crippling arthritis in my fingers so I use a voice machine doesn't always print out the correct words but you get the gist of it hopefully if you're not able to do that you probably shouldn't be on this site. The link was, niemanreports.org I want to make sure that's right at least. I can't correct everything at this stupid machine does.

 

[Stann]

Again no one is patting Putin on the back but they are not the USSR anymore nor are they a totalitarian people. The Russian people want to live in a Democratic Republic the same as us.....
I think the US is playing both sides here or at least the globalists who are now in charge of our country since the stolen election.

" Stolen election ", that says it all. There's no talking common sense with you. Try to have a good day. LOL.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

So now it is not hyperbole any longer and he really can declassify via telepathy?

That's not what I said. There you go lying, again.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

" Stolen election ", that says it all. There's no talking common sense with you. Try to have a good day. LOL.

Was Trump the legitimately elected 45th president?

 

[evenflow1969]

According to this, it isnt so black and white.

Yes, the president can declassify documents, but there isn’t a set protocol they have to follow

Former President Trump claimed documents found at Mar-a-Lago were “all declassified.” We explain why sitting presidents can declassify documents and how it works.

www.verifythis.com

He can basically do whatever he wants with declassification. There are informal protocols, but nothing set in stone. EXCEPT nuclear documents. Those are protected under the Atomic Energy Act.
Apparently, just because they are declassified, doesnt mean they can just take those documents with them when they leave the WH either.

Lol, so Trump just thinking that a document is declassified makes it declassified makes sense to you? Is this correct?

 

[otto105]

Have you guys not said this everyday for a decade?

Yeah, and it will change in 45 days.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That's not what I said. There you go lying, again.

Well make up your damn mind, you are all over the place.

 

[healthmyths]

How did Trump declassify documents from TOP SECRET to declassified and not tell anyone?

And where is your PROOF Trump "declassified documents"? Geez you make these claims but don't have any substantiation or PROOF!
How about this right-winger...... "It is been said by unidentified sources that "rightwinger" has leaked top secrets only to be read in a SCIF! "
Reliable sources say "rightwinger" is a well known white supremacist who has a male lover! Again just a claim by an unidentified BUT reliable source!

 

[Stann]

Of course you haven't, because there's no law that says what, or how the president can declassify.

archives.gov. Basic Laws and aAuthorities March 25th., 2003. This is a monthly read at least 25 pages, not for the light hearted. I skipped over a lot of it. Way too much information. However there is a definite process to declassify information. Presidents can do classified information and as long as the originator of the document agrees with his reasoning for declassifying it it's okay. However if there is a dispute it goes to a committee to be decided. Obviously trump never bothered to read it, or he couldn't comprehend what it was saying it.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

archives.gov. Basic Laws and aAuthorities March 25th., 2003. This is a monthly read at least 25 pages, not for the light hearted. I skipped over a lot of it. Way too much information. However there is a definite process to declassify information. Presidents can do classified information and as long as the originator of the document agrees with his reasoning for declassifying it it's okay. However if there is a dispute it goes to a committee to be decided. Obviously trump never bothered to read it, or he couldn't comprehend what it was saying it.

There's no one in the Executive Branch that can tell the president what he can, and can't classify, or declassify. Everyone in the Executive Branch answers to the president, not the other way around.

 

[Stann]

There's no one in the Executive Branch that can tell the president what he can, and can't classify, or declassify. Everyone in the Executive Branch answers to the president, not the other way around.

The president is just a man, he's not a god. He's only human and capable of mistakes and corruption. We have three equal branches of government the judicial the executive and the legislative each have checks to keep the other in check. Sorry but you aren't being reasonable you're some kind of fanatic. There's no sense in talking to you. You probably didn't even read the regulations regarding the classification process. I'm tired of listening to you talk out of your ass. It just plain stinks.

 

[the other mike]

God is declassifying the Democrats brains.

 

[Stann]

God is declassifying the Democrats brains.

Actually most Democrats do believe in God. It seems like most Republicans on the other hand just believe in the devil and do his bidding.

 

[the other mike]

Actually most Democrats do believe in God. It seems like most Republicans on the other hand just believe in the devil and do his bidding.

I'm not a Republican or a Democrat but as an objective Observer it looks to me like Republicans are by and large honest businessmen and Democrats are dishonest politicians

 

[Stann]

I'm not a Republican or a Democrat but as an objective Observer it looks to me like Republicans are by and large honest businessmen and Democrats are dishonest politicians

LOL, you picked a real doozy and in trump then. I guess you never heard the old saying, " One bad Apple destroys the whole bushel. " His corruption is so widespread and rampant in the Republican party now it is unrecognizable by the party that had integrity and goals at one time. I am not a Democrat, I am an independent I see problems with both parties but the Republican party is the greatest danger to our nation. Our system is semi-socialistic already a little more in the healthcare and advanced education arena and America will be a decent Nation for everyone to live in and attain the American dream.

 

[the other mike]

LOL, you picked a real doozy and in trump then. I guess you never heard the old saying, " One bad Apple destroys the whole bushel. " His corruption is so widespread and rampant in the Republican party now it is unrecognizable by the party that had integrity and goals at one time. I am not a Democrat, I am an independent I see problems with both parties but the Republican party is the greatest danger to our nation. Our system is semi-socialistic already a little more in the healthcare and advanced education arena and America will be a decent Nation for everyone to live in and attain the American dream.

I knew that Hillary Clinton was a war criminal and that Donald Trump was a seemingly unpredictable choice for president so I voted for Jill Stein in 2016 and then after the FBI scandal started emerging in 2017 and 2018 I did become a Trump supporter.

Not that I really feel obligated to explain it to you but there you go what do you have to say to that

 

[the other mike]

Lol

 

[Seymour Flops]

It’s common sense. Perhaps a friend or family member could lend you some?

We are a nation of laws. “Common sense” is not admissible in a criminal case.

 

[Stann]

I knew that Hillary Clinton was a war criminal and that Donald Trump was a seemingly unpredictable choice for president so I voted for Jill Stein in 2016 and then after the FBI scandal started emerging in 2017 and 2018 I did become a Trump supporter.

Not that I really feel obligated to explain it to you but there you go what do you have to say to that

Like I said I'm not a Democrat, political parties seem to always play games with one another. trump, already being a good con artist, has taken the game to new dangerous heights. Many would call it treason, and of course he knows how to play the victim so well his gullible followers will eat it all up. And that's exactly what he expects.