sartre play
Gold Member
- May 4, 2015
- 13,344
- 4,471
- 210
War with other Americans? A preference over working together?
How did we get here? PARTY OVER COUNTRY.
How did we get here? PARTY OVER COUNTRY.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right course but adjust the federal income tax from citizens to reflect the change and let it go to the state.Great idea. Let the states set their priorities.
As it should be, per 10A.states fill the gap...if they want![]()
Charities that states support are not the responsibility of the federal government.Right course but adjust the federal income tax from citizens to reflect the change and let it go to the state.
Trump is playing 5D chess again…he wants your cherished brown cockroaches gone…every single one of them…this is just another tool to be used for eradication.I get it. But why stop here. Why not end subsidies for "everything" ?
I paid for a black woman's clothes and groceries today. I passed on the opportunity to do the same for a white person.Trump is playing 5D chess again…he wants your cherished brown cockroaches gone…every single one of them…this is just another tool to be used for eradication.
The red states not only will not, they cannot make up the difference. They simply do not have the budget even if they wanted to.
That’s racist.I paid for a black woman's clothes and groceries today. I passed on the opportunity to do the same for a white person.
Did you bother to read the post? The aid isn't being cut, it's being redirected to the states so they can design programs that meet their needs.If you are going to cut the safety line to those in need, maybe it is time to cut the subsidies to those making "billions" that really do not need it.
Not a bad idea, the states are more in tune with what their localities need then some guy in Washington DCstates fill the gap...if they want
I get it. But why stop here. Why not end subsidies for "everything" ?
President Trump has repeatedly promised to "make America affordable again." But for those Americans most in need, his administration's latest budget plan would dramatically shrink the federal rental aid that helps keep millions of people housed.
In its request for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the White House called the current system of federal rental assistance "dysfunctional" and proposed essentially ending Section 8 and other housing voucher programs. Its plan calls for cutting rental aid by about 40% and sending that money to states "to design their own rental assistance programs based on their unique needs and preferences."
tough shit, live with itThat’s racist.

perhaps YOU did not read it.Did you bother to read the post? The aid isn't being cut, it's being redirected to the states so they can design programs that meet their needs.
Just pointing out that Dems call other people racist, while they THEY are the bigots.tough shit, live with it![]()
All that means is that landlords will have to bring rates down to what they would be if taxpayers weren’t subsidizing them.perhaps YOU did not read it.
Its plan calls for cutting rental aid by about 40%
Trump budget would slash rental aid by 40% — and let states fill the gap if they want
It is high time to stop financing laziness.states fill the gap...if they want
I get it. But why stop here. Why not end subsidies for "everything" ?
President Trump has repeatedly promised to "make America affordable again." But for those Americans most in need, his administration's latest budget plan would dramatically shrink the federal rental aid that helps keep millions of people housed.
In its request for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the White House called the current system of federal rental assistance "dysfunctional" and proposed essentially ending Section 8 and other housing voucher programs. Its plan calls for cutting rental aid by about 40% and sending that money to states "to design their own rental assistance programs based on their unique needs and preferences."
Because they are the engines of our economy.If you are going to cut the safety line to those in need, maybe it is time to cut the subsidies to those making "billions" that really do not need it.
All that means is that landlords will have to bring rates down to what they would be if taxpayers weren’t subsidizing them.
Good move.
Trickle down, right?Because they are the engines of our economy.
sure
The proposal comes as nearly half of all renters are considered cost-burdened and as homelessness is at a record high. Advocates say that if millions of poor people barely making ends meet were to suddenly see their rental aid shrink — or even end altogether — it would tip many over the edge.
"We would see, I think, homelessness escalate in a way that has been really unprecedented, and unheard of," said Kim Johnson, policy manager with the National Low Income Housing Coalition.