Sure it does. It shows he and your are ******* hypocrites.
No, it doesn't. I want the policy. I don't want him or any small number of individuals showing me how much they have "warm feelings" for me, I want POLICY to force systemic changes to benefit AMERICAN WORKERS.
Yeah, he validates your racism. And you love him for it.
You made a policy claim, ie that Trump was NOT trying to raise US worker wages. I pointed out policies that he is implementing right now, that should have that effect.
That proved your point false.
You saying your magic word, ie "Racism" means nothing to me, nor does it challenge my point at all.
You lose. And really, not just you as an individual, but YOu plural as the left, because you argument only worked, when you controlled the media and could shout that and stop anyone from pointing out how stupid your claim was. Now, that doesn't work anymore and won't ever again.
And you have nothing else. So, BOO-YAH, in your face.
Look **** stain... a trade deficit in our case is a sign of a robust economy because not only are domestic industries supported...we are buying a shit ton of merchandise from other nations. They are suffering the ill effects of pollution, worker endagerment, slave wages, etc... Not us. Hence our standard of living, our disposable income, our GDP and near full employment ( that was before the blob oozed back into office).
I live in the rust belt. Your pov on this is... not right. THe jobs generate wealth. They make families and communities. These policies that you are fighting for, took that from us, adn gave them to china.
People are dying here, because of the harm these policies have done to us. I have seen it, in my peers.
Amoeba level intelligence folks like yourself see the word "deficit" and react to it without thinking...thinking causes your small brain to hurt. But try desperately to give it some thought. I know it's a pipe dream but who knows...a broken clock is right twice a day...which is twice more than you are .
**** off.
Nope. I saw the word "deficit" and didn't react. Then I saw the results in my community over time and saw the damage it did, and saw that the promised results of the policy never happened.
Then I realized that the policy had failed and should be changed.
That was back in the 90s. We should have changed the policies then. But your side used your control of the media to shout down our complaints and effectively disenfranchised us.
That was very, very shitty of you. and we did not appreciate it. The way that you talked shit about us in teh process, calling us names and saying that the damage done to us, by your policies, was our failure, to "learn to code" or some such shit,
really got old after a couple of decades.
Don't bother whining to us, about how harsh we are being. You choose this path. YOu set teh rules of engagement. You decided it to be a blood sport, instead of civil policy disputes.
