Trey Gowdy is "troubled" over the latest revelation in the saga of the "Russia" investigation

lk070917dAPR.jpg


Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), speaking Martha MacCallum on Fox News Tuesday, said that he was disturbed by the details in the emails disclosed by Donald Trump Jr., and not so much about what actually happened at the meeting.




MacCallum asked Gowdy, "So in terms of this Donald Trump Jr. story that’s out there today, are you troubled by any of it?"

Gowdy replied:

Yeah, I’m troubled on three levels. Number one, the legal level, but I think that’s Bob Mueller’s lane. [On] the political level, Martha, here we are beginning another week, this one in July with a new revelation about Russia. And the third, which is more of a medical issue is the amnesia of the people that are in the Trump orbit. Someone close to the president needs to get everyone connected with that campaign in a room and say from the time you saw "Doctor Zhivago" until the moment you drank vodka with a guy named "Boris," you list every single one of those and we’re gonna turn them over to the special counsel.
“Are you concerned that there was an effort to influence this campaign with regard to changing that,” MacCallum then asked, “or to find a sympathetic ear on that?”

Gowdy replied:
I’m not nearly as concerned with that. I’m much more concerned with the purported reason of the meeting as opposed to the real reason. The purported reason was for an agent of a foreign power to try to influence our election. That concerns me more than someone trying to sit down with a member of perhaps an incoming administration to lobby for a policy change.

I’m much more concerned with the words of the actual email than the real reason she wanted to meet,” he said.​

“Which words in the email disturb you?” MacCallum asked.

Gowdy replied
Russian governments’ efforts to help the Trump campaign, official documents.​

Well, butter my butt and call me a biscuit! Gowdy may well be Trump's "Cronkite." I can't think of any elected official who's been more of a lickspittle to Trump than Trey Gowdy. Gowdy has long been one of the few sharp witted and acerbic defenders of all things Trump. Well, that too has now come to pass.

The fact of the matter is that the disclosures Gowdy admonishes Trump's team to make should long ago have been made.

Screen-Shot-2017-07-12-at-11.05.21-AM-804x519-fdf818b.png

The June 2016 sit-down with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya was first brought to government officials’ attention when it was listed among the foreign contacts on Kushner’s amended application for a top-level security clearance, according to the New York Times. Kushner had initially omitted all of his meetings with foreign nationals from his SF-86, the questionnaire all applicants for national security clearances must fill out.

How many foreign contacts must one omit from their SF-86 forms to lose their security clearance immediately? Why hasn't Kushner's clearance been terminated? Why haven't all the individuals who, by dint of their convenient omissions of explicitly requesting information, pose a security risk been removed from the WH, at least temporarily sequestered from it and all it does even if not permanently?

Kushner managed to "forget" more foreign contacts than he listed, since he listed exactly zero. I mean, really. Who'd have known that Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, the head of a U.S.-sanctioned Russian state-run bank or a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer are "individuals associated with a foreign business or other foreign organization" that also did not employ Kushner? Is it that one or more of those individuals or the organizations for which they worked did employ Kushner; he listed them in a different section of the form? The answer: NOBODY!

Be that as it may, what's certain is that no asset of a foreign government would on an SF-86 list congresses with known or suspected operatives of that government. And how many times did Kushner submitted his SF-86? Three times!
  • First, the inaccurate form, which left blank the foreign contacts section.
  • Next (and the next day), the form was amended to say that he had multiple contacts and would disclose those. The process of gathering information progressed throughout the winter and spring.

    Really? It took the winter and spring to gather the scant bits of information the form requests? Does Kushner truly not have a calendar and an email program? I don't put every meeting I attend in my calendar, but the ones I and my boss will together attend surely does make it onto my calendar, if only to facilitate my ensuring I carve out adequate time for preparing for and traveling to and from the meeting. I'm sorry, but no senior principal is going to buy that it legitimately takes that long to gather such basic information.
  • Then the form was amended yet again to include the Trump Jr. meeting as soon as it was discovered, a source with knowledge of the process told CNN.
Of course Gowdy isn't terribly concerned about the fact that Russians attempted to influence the campaign or the election's outcome. Anyone with the barest awareness of how the Russians do things is well aware the Russians will at least try to do something of that nature. He rightly is concerned that highly placed Trump campaign, now Trump Administration, players:
  • Didn't comprehend the nature of how the Russians do things and in their zeal went ahead with the meetings and whatever disclosures may have resulted from them.

    This may be possible re: Trump, Jr., particularly if he's literally as stupid as his father, but not Manafort, who also was in attendance. That said, just how oblivious or unpatriotic must one be not to know that discussing anything with Russians officials and their known cut-outs is a "no-no?"
  • Did comprehend the nature of what they were potentially getting into and, in their zeal to win, didn't give a damn and forged onward.

    This is definitely something that could very well have been the case with Manafort, whom I would not be surprised to find that he's a witting or unwitting Russian asset, so deep are his ties to Russian officials.
From Gowdy's remarks, which are the point of this post/thread, it seems that even he has reached the point of realizing the nation will be better off without Trump, his court, its jesters, and his cronies at the helm. He's clearly no longer seeing the lipstick and denying that our porcine president, Trump, is not a pig.

morin_t810.gif


Yeah.. Right On !!! The part I'm troubled about is that Don Jr is NOT SUBJECT to WH access clearances. Probably has much lower clearances. Because Don Jr is not PART of the Admin. Can't be. Runs Trump Enterprises. So the one re-filing the Form 86 (and others you'll never see) is Kushner. Who had to disclose this contact because he had access to the details of this set-up meeting during the campaign.

And the part that disturbs ME is that all this info goes to the FBI. WHERE IT WAS LEAKED to NY Times. If my applications were ever subject to leaks -- I'd have a Holy Cow.

Here's the problem with this deal that NO ONE in the media is gonna analyze for you. The BAD JUDGEMENT and lack of discretion on the part of Don Jr is certainly visible here. Even discussing the set-up of the meeting should have been a Red Flag (literally).. But I UNDERSTAND. Because at the time, ALL of the people involved were private citizens who NEVER HAD clearances and were never BRIEFED into the ways of foreign espionage and what to look for. They had NO sensitivity to how much fuss and paperwork is involved with "foreign meetings".. So they were NAIVE and "security virgins".

NO PERSON who has been cleared and read into secure programs would EVER take that bait without protecting themselves by disclosing it BEFOREHAND to their "security officer"...

This is simply what happens in campaigns where MOST people are civilians and outsiders and don't REALIZE the implications of such an "offered bait"... NO campaign should be run without adequate # of people who hold or HAVE held security clearances. And they should be the go-to for advice before ANY foreign contacts are made..


Naive is a defense for someone who goes in a c store with his buddy to get a beer and the buddy decided to rob and murder the clerk. Naive won't get it here, he did it to get dirt.


I think that in terms of "being ready for prime time" in the political and governance game, Don Jr. is but a deer in the headlights. Now Kushner and Manfort are not; both are formally trained lawyers, and Manafort has scads of experience running political campaigns. (What he might not have is tons of experience dealing with shady sons of bitches like Donald Trump.) At a minimum, both are well aware of the laws that were potentially about to be broken by having the meeting with Ms. V. (the Russian lawyer).

As campaign chairman, what the hell was Manafort's job but to, among other things, protect campaign staffers from their own naivete? That's part of any senior leader's and manager's job. Managers, principals, doesn't let their people make stupid mistakes because they don't know any better. Competent managers think about the risks and make the call about whether they will permit their people to undertake a given course of action.



And yet......john podesta, another political operative actually does have ties to actual Russians.....while he was campaign chairman to hilary.....and the democrats actually did collude with Ukraine against the Trump campaign.....was he not aware of the problems with doing that?


Yes.......it is becoming clear that the democrats were the real colluders with Russia...not to mention they tried to set up Donald Jr. all this b.s. is simply an effort by the democrats and their misguided followers to keep Trump from implementing the changes that America needs to recover from the stupid actions of the obama administration....the democrats are thus comitting treason by working against the best interests of America with their so called 'resistance' movement a thingly disguised effort to engage in treason and insurrection.
 
Well, just as icing on the cake, Xelor, the President stated last night from Paris that "Most people would have taken that meeting."
So much for claiming total innocence on his part. He better be careful what he says--his foot is slipping....

When I saw our President make that remark to the world, I felt ashamed.
Just ashamed. Nothing else to say.

Keep waiting oldlady....you are going to see a lot more people who took that meeting with this same lawyer......this story is just starting and it is going to bite the democrats on the ass...again...


Exactly and when it is finally over and the people see all the time and money wasted....The Donald's popularity will zoom....we are seeing the making of a Great President....he has a chance to become the Greatest President in modern history.
 
How many democrats were ever troubled by Bill Clinton or Barry Hussein even during the worst times of their administrations? Democrats wouldn't dare to criticize a democrat president or exhibit the slightest concern of the most outrageous conduct by a democrat because they would be fired.

Fired or worse....a long list of bodies connected to the Clintons and these cases were never even investigated...they were ruled 'suicides' time and again...with no evidence to support that conclusion....and it is well known that the modus operandi of the Dixie mafia was to make it appear that it was suicide instead of a homicide....and just recently another body was added to that list...the republican who attempted to get Clintons e mails.
GOP operative who sought Clinton's emails committed suicide


The Clinton Crime Family - The Bill Clinton Murders (The Making Of A President)

The Bubble: Russian lawyer who met with Trump Jr. tied to Dems, Hannity says
 
Last edited:
What is more disturbing that in an attempt to help a Russian Money Launderer, Barry and Loretta bypassed Obama's US Immigration Department's Visa Denial - refusal to allow this Russian lawyer, iving her instead a speial entry into the US. Add in the fact that Hillary's lawyer acted as this Russian lawyer's chaperone, and you have a troubling matter.

This Russian lawyer also turns out to be a lobbyist for Russian-US adoptions who also met with Cingressmen and the media.

But why was Barry and Loretta ignoring Immigration's ban into the US for this lawyer in order to help a Russian Money Launderer?

If Barry had not bypassed his own Dept of Inmigration's refusal to let this lawyer into the country, if Barry and Loretta would not have been helping a Russian money launderer win a case against Loretta's DOJ, there would have been no meetig between Jr and the lawyer.
 
lk070917dAPR.jpg


Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), speaking Martha MacCallum on Fox News Tuesday, said that he was disturbed by the details in the emails disclosed by Donald Trump Jr., and not so much about what actually happened at the meeting.




MacCallum asked Gowdy, "So in terms of this Donald Trump Jr. story that’s out there today, are you troubled by any of it?"

Gowdy replied:

Yeah, I’m troubled on three levels. Number one, the legal level, but I think that’s Bob Mueller’s lane. [On] the political level, Martha, here we are beginning another week, this one in July with a new revelation about Russia. And the third, which is more of a medical issue is the amnesia of the people that are in the Trump orbit. Someone close to the president needs to get everyone connected with that campaign in a room and say from the time you saw "Doctor Zhivago" until the moment you drank vodka with a guy named "Boris," you list every single one of those and we’re gonna turn them over to the special counsel.
“Are you concerned that there was an effort to influence this campaign with regard to changing that,” MacCallum then asked, “or to find a sympathetic ear on that?”

Gowdy replied:
I’m not nearly as concerned with that. I’m much more concerned with the purported reason of the meeting as opposed to the real reason. The purported reason was for an agent of a foreign power to try to influence our election. That concerns me more than someone trying to sit down with a member of perhaps an incoming administration to lobby for a policy change.

I’m much more concerned with the words of the actual email than the real reason she wanted to meet,” he said.​

“Which words in the email disturb you?” MacCallum asked.

Gowdy replied
Russian governments’ efforts to help the Trump campaign, official documents.​

Well, butter my butt and call me a biscuit! Gowdy may well be Trump's "Cronkite." I can't think of any elected official who's been more of a lickspittle to Trump than Trey Gowdy. Gowdy has long been one of the few sharp witted and acerbic defenders of all things Trump. Well, that too has now come to pass.

The fact of the matter is that the disclosures Gowdy admonishes Trump's team to make should long ago have been made.

Screen-Shot-2017-07-12-at-11.05.21-AM-804x519-fdf818b.png

The June 2016 sit-down with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya was first brought to government officials’ attention when it was listed among the foreign contacts on Kushner’s amended application for a top-level security clearance, according to the New York Times. Kushner had initially omitted all of his meetings with foreign nationals from his SF-86, the questionnaire all applicants for national security clearances must fill out.

How many foreign contacts must one omit from their SF-86 forms to lose their security clearance immediately? Why hasn't Kushner's clearance been terminated? Why haven't all the individuals who, by dint of their convenient omissions of explicitly requesting information, pose a security risk been removed from the WH, at least temporarily sequestered from it and all it does even if not permanently?

Kushner managed to "forget" more foreign contacts than he listed, since he listed exactly zero. I mean, really. Who'd have known that Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, the head of a U.S.-sanctioned Russian state-run bank or a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer are "individuals associated with a foreign business or other foreign organization" that also did not employ Kushner? Is it that one or more of those individuals or the organizations for which they worked did employ Kushner; he listed them in a different section of the form? The answer: NOBODY!

Be that as it may, what's certain is that no asset of a foreign government would on an SF-86 list congresses with known or suspected operatives of that government. And how many times did Kushner submitted his SF-86? Three times!
  • First, the inaccurate form, which left blank the foreign contacts section.
  • Next (and the next day), the form was amended to say that he had multiple contacts and would disclose those. The process of gathering information progressed throughout the winter and spring.

    Really? It took the winter and spring to gather the scant bits of information the form requests? Does Kushner truly not have a calendar and an email program? I don't put every meeting I attend in my calendar, but the ones I and my boss will together attend surely does make it onto my calendar, if only to facilitate my ensuring I carve out adequate time for preparing for and traveling to and from the meeting. I'm sorry, but no senior principal is going to buy that it legitimately takes that long to gather such basic information.
  • Then the form was amended yet again to include the Trump Jr. meeting as soon as it was discovered, a source with knowledge of the process told CNN.
Of course Gowdy isn't terribly concerned about the fact that Russians attempted to influence the campaign or the election's outcome. Anyone with the barest awareness of how the Russians do things is well aware the Russians will at least try to do something of that nature. He rightly is concerned that highly placed Trump campaign, now Trump Administration, players:
  • Didn't comprehend the nature of how the Russians do things and in their zeal went ahead with the meetings and whatever disclosures may have resulted from them.

    This may be possible re: Trump, Jr., particularly if he's literally as stupid as his father, but not Manafort, who also was in attendance. That said, just how oblivious or unpatriotic must one be not to know that discussing anything with Russians officials and their known cut-outs is a "no-no?"
  • Did comprehend the nature of what they were potentially getting into and, in their zeal to win, didn't give a damn and forged onward.

    This is definitely something that could very well have been the case with Manafort, whom I would not be surprised to find that he's a witting or unwitting Russian asset, so deep are his ties to Russian officials.
From Gowdy's remarks, which are the point of this post/thread, it seems that even he has reached the point of realizing the nation will be better off without Trump, his court, its jesters, and his cronies at the helm. He's clearly no longer seeing the lipstick and denying that our porcine president, Trump, is not a pig.

morin_t810.gif


Yeah.. Right On !!! The part I'm troubled about is that Don Jr is NOT SUBJECT to WH access clearances. Probably has much lower clearances. Because Don Jr is not PART of the Admin. Can't be. Runs Trump Enterprises. So the one re-filing the Form 86 (and others you'll never see) is Kushner. Who had to disclose this contact because he had access to the details of this set-up meeting during the campaign.

And the part that disturbs ME is that all this info goes to the FBI. WHERE IT WAS LEAKED to NY Times. If my applications were ever subject to leaks -- I'd have a Holy Cow.

Here's the problem with this deal that NO ONE in the media is gonna analyze for you. The BAD JUDGEMENT and lack of discretion on the part of Don Jr is certainly visible here. Even discussing the set-up of the meeting should have been a Red Flag (literally).. But I UNDERSTAND. Because at the time, ALL of the people involved were private citizens who NEVER HAD clearances and were never BRIEFED into the ways of foreign espionage and what to look for. They had NO sensitivity to how much fuss and paperwork is involved with "foreign meetings".. So they were NAIVE and "security virgins".

NO PERSON who has been cleared and read into secure programs would EVER take that bait without protecting themselves by disclosing it BEFOREHAND to their "security officer"...

This is simply what happens in campaigns where MOST people are civilians and outsiders and don't REALIZE the implications of such an "offered bait"... NO campaign should be run without adequate # of people who hold or HAVE held security clearances. And they should be the go-to for advice before ANY foreign contacts are made..


Naive is a defense for someone who goes in a c store with his buddy to get a beer and the buddy decided to rob and murder the clerk. Naive won't get it here, he did it to get dirt.


I think that in terms of "being ready for prime time" in the political and governance game, Don Jr. is but a deer in the headlights. Now Kushner and Manfort are not; both are formally trained lawyers, and Manafort has scads of experience running political campaigns. (What he might not have is tons of experience dealing with shady sons of bitches like Donald Trump.) At a minimum, both are well aware of the laws that were potentially about to be broken by having the meeting with Ms. V. (the Russian lawyer).

As campaign chairman, what the hell was Manafort's job but to, among other things, protect campaign staffers from their own naivete? That's part of any senior leader's and manager's job. Managers, principals, doesn't let their people make stupid mistakes because they don't know any better. Competent managers think about the risks and make the call about whether they will permit their people to undertake a given course of action.



And yet......john podesta, another political operative actually does have ties to actual Russians.....while he was campaign chairman to hilary.....and the democrats actually did collude with Ukraine against the Trump campaign.....was he not aware of the problems with doing that?

You're about the zillionth poster who has said the Democrats colluded with Ukraine against the Trump campaign. Can you give me a link on that? I have no idea what you're referring to.
 
lk070917dAPR.jpg


Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), speaking Martha MacCallum on Fox News Tuesday, said that he was disturbed by the details in the emails disclosed by Donald Trump Jr., and not so much about what actually happened at the meeting.




MacCallum asked Gowdy, "So in terms of this Donald Trump Jr. story that’s out there today, are you troubled by any of it?"

Gowdy replied:

Yeah, I’m troubled on three levels. Number one, the legal level, but I think that’s Bob Mueller’s lane. [On] the political level, Martha, here we are beginning another week, this one in July with a new revelation about Russia. And the third, which is more of a medical issue is the amnesia of the people that are in the Trump orbit. Someone close to the president needs to get everyone connected with that campaign in a room and say from the time you saw "Doctor Zhivago" until the moment you drank vodka with a guy named "Boris," you list every single one of those and we’re gonna turn them over to the special counsel.
“Are you concerned that there was an effort to influence this campaign with regard to changing that,” MacCallum then asked, “or to find a sympathetic ear on that?”

Gowdy replied:
I’m not nearly as concerned with that. I’m much more concerned with the purported reason of the meeting as opposed to the real reason. The purported reason was for an agent of a foreign power to try to influence our election. That concerns me more than someone trying to sit down with a member of perhaps an incoming administration to lobby for a policy change.

I’m much more concerned with the words of the actual email than the real reason she wanted to meet,” he said.​

“Which words in the email disturb you?” MacCallum asked.

Gowdy replied
Russian governments’ efforts to help the Trump campaign, official documents.​

Well, butter my butt and call me a biscuit! Gowdy may well be Trump's "Cronkite." I can't think of any elected official who's been more of a lickspittle to Trump than Trey Gowdy. Gowdy has long been one of the few sharp witted and acerbic defenders of all things Trump. Well, that too has now come to pass.

The fact of the matter is that the disclosures Gowdy admonishes Trump's team to make should long ago have been made.

Screen-Shot-2017-07-12-at-11.05.21-AM-804x519-fdf818b.png

The June 2016 sit-down with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya was first brought to government officials’ attention when it was listed among the foreign contacts on Kushner’s amended application for a top-level security clearance, according to the New York Times. Kushner had initially omitted all of his meetings with foreign nationals from his SF-86, the questionnaire all applicants for national security clearances must fill out.

How many foreign contacts must one omit from their SF-86 forms to lose their security clearance immediately? Why hasn't Kushner's clearance been terminated? Why haven't all the individuals who, by dint of their convenient omissions of explicitly requesting information, pose a security risk been removed from the WH, at least temporarily sequestered from it and all it does even if not permanently?

Kushner managed to "forget" more foreign contacts than he listed, since he listed exactly zero. I mean, really. Who'd have known that Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, the head of a U.S.-sanctioned Russian state-run bank or a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer are "individuals associated with a foreign business or other foreign organization" that also did not employ Kushner? Is it that one or more of those individuals or the organizations for which they worked did employ Kushner; he listed them in a different section of the form? The answer: NOBODY!

Be that as it may, what's certain is that no asset of a foreign government would on an SF-86 list congresses with known or suspected operatives of that government. And how many times did Kushner submitted his SF-86? Three times!
  • First, the inaccurate form, which left blank the foreign contacts section.
  • Next (and the next day), the form was amended to say that he had multiple contacts and would disclose those. The process of gathering information progressed throughout the winter and spring.

    Really? It took the winter and spring to gather the scant bits of information the form requests? Does Kushner truly not have a calendar and an email program? I don't put every meeting I attend in my calendar, but the ones I and my boss will together attend surely does make it onto my calendar, if only to facilitate my ensuring I carve out adequate time for preparing for and traveling to and from the meeting. I'm sorry, but no senior principal is going to buy that it legitimately takes that long to gather such basic information.
  • Then the form was amended yet again to include the Trump Jr. meeting as soon as it was discovered, a source with knowledge of the process told CNN.
Of course Gowdy isn't terribly concerned about the fact that Russians attempted to influence the campaign or the election's outcome. Anyone with the barest awareness of how the Russians do things is well aware the Russians will at least try to do something of that nature. He rightly is concerned that highly placed Trump campaign, now Trump Administration, players:
  • Didn't comprehend the nature of how the Russians do things and in their zeal went ahead with the meetings and whatever disclosures may have resulted from them.

    This may be possible re: Trump, Jr., particularly if he's literally as stupid as his father, but not Manafort, who also was in attendance. That said, just how oblivious or unpatriotic must one be not to know that discussing anything with Russians officials and their known cut-outs is a "no-no?"
  • Did comprehend the nature of what they were potentially getting into and, in their zeal to win, didn't give a damn and forged onward.

    This is definitely something that could very well have been the case with Manafort, whom I would not be surprised to find that he's a witting or unwitting Russian asset, so deep are his ties to Russian officials.
From Gowdy's remarks, which are the point of this post/thread, it seems that even he has reached the point of realizing the nation will be better off without Trump, his court, its jesters, and his cronies at the helm. He's clearly no longer seeing the lipstick and denying that our porcine president, Trump, is not a pig.

morin_t810.gif


Yeah.. Right On !!! The part I'm troubled about is that Don Jr is NOT SUBJECT to WH access clearances. Probably has much lower clearances. Because Don Jr is not PART of the Admin. Can't be. Runs Trump Enterprises. So the one re-filing the Form 86 (and others you'll never see) is Kushner. Who had to disclose this contact because he had access to the details of this set-up meeting during the campaign.

And the part that disturbs ME is that all this info goes to the FBI. WHERE IT WAS LEAKED to NY Times. If my applications were ever subject to leaks -- I'd have a Holy Cow.

Here's the problem with this deal that NO ONE in the media is gonna analyze for you. The BAD JUDGEMENT and lack of discretion on the part of Don Jr is certainly visible here. Even discussing the set-up of the meeting should have been a Red Flag (literally).. But I UNDERSTAND. Because at the time, ALL of the people involved were private citizens who NEVER HAD clearances and were never BRIEFED into the ways of foreign espionage and what to look for. They had NO sensitivity to how much fuss and paperwork is involved with "foreign meetings".. So they were NAIVE and "security virgins".

NO PERSON who has been cleared and read into secure programs would EVER take that bait without protecting themselves by disclosing it BEFOREHAND to their "security officer"...

This is simply what happens in campaigns where MOST people are civilians and outsiders and don't REALIZE the implications of such an "offered bait"... NO campaign should be run without adequate # of people who hold or HAVE held security clearances. And they should be the go-to for advice before ANY foreign contacts are made..


Once again you people fail to read! Look at the form. What does it say? It says "advice or support"!
It doesn't say, "had lunch with", "shared an elevator", "had sexual relations with" or anything of the sort.

That meeting would not qualify as required to be reported, and as someone who once held a TS SCI and has endured many background investigations, that does not need to be reported.

If it was required, no businessman could ever work for the government because the current administration would be out of office before he ever finished the freakin' questionnaire!


Jr was not acting in his capacity as a businessman. He was operating as part of a political campaign as Trump campaign officials accompanied him. She made it very clear what she wanted and Jr made it very clear that he was interested. He should have reported it to the FBI so they could wire him and find out what her connections are to Russia.

because this is exactly what the democrats do, right?

we've got all their honest hard earned surveillance tapes as proof, right?

god the bullshit is overflowing.
 
Well, just as icing on the cake, Xelor, the President stated last night from Paris that "Most people would have taken that meeting."
So much for claiming total innocence on his part. He better be careful what he says--his foot is slipping....

When I saw our President make that remark to the world, I felt ashamed.
Just ashamed. Nothing else to say.

bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa toooooooo funnnni hehheh
You have a strange sense of humor.
 
lk070917dAPR.jpg


Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), speaking Martha MacCallum on Fox News Tuesday, said that he was disturbed by the details in the emails disclosed by Donald Trump Jr., and not so much about what actually happened at the meeting.




MacCallum asked Gowdy, "So in terms of this Donald Trump Jr. story that’s out there today, are you troubled by any of it?"

Gowdy replied:

Yeah, I’m troubled on three levels. Number one, the legal level, but I think that’s Bob Mueller’s lane. [On] the political level, Martha, here we are beginning another week, this one in July with a new revelation about Russia. And the third, which is more of a medical issue is the amnesia of the people that are in the Trump orbit. Someone close to the president needs to get everyone connected with that campaign in a room and say from the time you saw "Doctor Zhivago" until the moment you drank vodka with a guy named "Boris," you list every single one of those and we’re gonna turn them over to the special counsel.
“Are you concerned that there was an effort to influence this campaign with regard to changing that,” MacCallum then asked, “or to find a sympathetic ear on that?”

Gowdy replied:
I’m not nearly as concerned with that. I’m much more concerned with the purported reason of the meeting as opposed to the real reason. The purported reason was for an agent of a foreign power to try to influence our election. That concerns me more than someone trying to sit down with a member of perhaps an incoming administration to lobby for a policy change.

I’m much more concerned with the words of the actual email than the real reason she wanted to meet,” he said.​

“Which words in the email disturb you?” MacCallum asked.

Gowdy replied
Russian governments’ efforts to help the Trump campaign, official documents.​

Well, butter my butt and call me a biscuit! Gowdy may well be Trump's "Cronkite." I can't think of any elected official who's been more of a lickspittle to Trump than Trey Gowdy. Gowdy has long been one of the few sharp witted and acerbic defenders of all things Trump. Well, that too has now come to pass.

The fact of the matter is that the disclosures Gowdy admonishes Trump's team to make should long ago have been made.

Screen-Shot-2017-07-12-at-11.05.21-AM-804x519-fdf818b.png

The June 2016 sit-down with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya was first brought to government officials’ attention when it was listed among the foreign contacts on Kushner’s amended application for a top-level security clearance, according to the New York Times. Kushner had initially omitted all of his meetings with foreign nationals from his SF-86, the questionnaire all applicants for national security clearances must fill out.

How many foreign contacts must one omit from their SF-86 forms to lose their security clearance immediately? Why hasn't Kushner's clearance been terminated? Why haven't all the individuals who, by dint of their convenient omissions of explicitly requesting information, pose a security risk been removed from the WH, at least temporarily sequestered from it and all it does even if not permanently?

Kushner managed to "forget" more foreign contacts than he listed, since he listed exactly zero. I mean, really. Who'd have known that Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, the head of a U.S.-sanctioned Russian state-run bank or a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer are "individuals associated with a foreign business or other foreign organization" that also did not employ Kushner? Is it that one or more of those individuals or the organizations for which they worked did employ Kushner; he listed them in a different section of the form? The answer: NOBODY!

Be that as it may, what's certain is that no asset of a foreign government would on an SF-86 list congresses with known or suspected operatives of that government. And how many times did Kushner submitted his SF-86? Three times!
  • First, the inaccurate form, which left blank the foreign contacts section.
  • Next (and the next day), the form was amended to say that he had multiple contacts and would disclose those. The process of gathering information progressed throughout the winter and spring.

    Really? It took the winter and spring to gather the scant bits of information the form requests? Does Kushner truly not have a calendar and an email program? I don't put every meeting I attend in my calendar, but the ones I and my boss will together attend surely does make it onto my calendar, if only to facilitate my ensuring I carve out adequate time for preparing for and traveling to and from the meeting. I'm sorry, but no senior principal is going to buy that it legitimately takes that long to gather such basic information.
  • Then the form was amended yet again to include the Trump Jr. meeting as soon as it was discovered, a source with knowledge of the process told CNN.
Of course Gowdy isn't terribly concerned about the fact that Russians attempted to influence the campaign or the election's outcome. Anyone with the barest awareness of how the Russians do things is well aware the Russians will at least try to do something of that nature. He rightly is concerned that highly placed Trump campaign, now Trump Administration, players:
  • Didn't comprehend the nature of how the Russians do things and in their zeal went ahead with the meetings and whatever disclosures may have resulted from them.

    This may be possible re: Trump, Jr., particularly if he's literally as stupid as his father, but not Manafort, who also was in attendance. That said, just how oblivious or unpatriotic must one be not to know that discussing anything with Russians officials and their known cut-outs is a "no-no?"
  • Did comprehend the nature of what they were potentially getting into and, in their zeal to win, didn't give a damn and forged onward.

    This is definitely something that could very well have been the case with Manafort, whom I would not be surprised to find that he's a witting or unwitting Russian asset, so deep are his ties to Russian officials.
From Gowdy's remarks, which are the point of this post/thread, it seems that even he has reached the point of realizing the nation will be better off without Trump, his court, its jesters, and his cronies at the helm. He's clearly no longer seeing the lipstick and denying that our porcine president, Trump, is not a pig.

morin_t810.gif


Yeah.. Right On !!! The part I'm troubled about is that Don Jr is NOT SUBJECT to WH access clearances. Probably has much lower clearances. Because Don Jr is not PART of the Admin. Can't be. Runs Trump Enterprises. So the one re-filing the Form 86 (and others you'll never see) is Kushner. Who had to disclose this contact because he had access to the details of this set-up meeting during the campaign.

And the part that disturbs ME is that all this info goes to the FBI. WHERE IT WAS LEAKED to NY Times. If my applications were ever subject to leaks -- I'd have a Holy Cow.

Here's the problem with this deal that NO ONE in the media is gonna analyze for you. The BAD JUDGEMENT and lack of discretion on the part of Don Jr is certainly visible here. Even discussing the set-up of the meeting should have been a Red Flag (literally).. But I UNDERSTAND. Because at the time, ALL of the people involved were private citizens who NEVER HAD clearances and were never BRIEFED into the ways of foreign espionage and what to look for. They had NO sensitivity to how much fuss and paperwork is involved with "foreign meetings".. So they were NAIVE and "security virgins".

NO PERSON who has been cleared and read into secure programs would EVER take that bait without protecting themselves by disclosing it BEFOREHAND to their "security officer"...

This is simply what happens in campaigns where MOST people are civilians and outsiders and don't REALIZE the implications of such an "offered bait"... NO campaign should be run without adequate # of people who hold or HAVE held security clearances. And they should be the go-to for advice before ANY foreign contacts are made..


Naive is a defense for someone who goes in a c store with his buddy to get a beer and the buddy decided to rob and murder the clerk. Naive won't get it here, he did it to get dirt.


I think that in terms of "being ready for prime time" in the political and governance game, Don Jr. is but a deer in the headlights. Now Kushner and Manfort are not; both are formally trained lawyers, and Manafort has scads of experience running political campaigns. (What he might not have is tons of experience dealing with shady sons of bitches like Donald Trump.) At a minimum, both are well aware of the laws that were potentially about to be broken by having the meeting with Ms. V. (the Russian lawyer).

As campaign chairman, what the hell was Manafort's job but to, among other things, protect campaign staffers from their own naivete? That's part of any senior leader's and manager's job. Managers, principals, doesn't let their people make stupid mistakes because they don't know any better. Competent managers think about the risks and make the call about whether they will permit their people to undertake a given course of action.



And yet......john podesta, another political operative actually does have ties to actual Russians.....while he was campaign chairman to hilary.....and the democrats actually did collude with Ukraine against the Trump campaign.....was he not aware of the problems with doing that?

You're about the zillionth poster who has said the Democrats colluded with Ukraine against the Trump campaign. Can you give me a link on that? I have no idea what you're referring to.

google isn't tough.

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
 
Well, just as icing on the cake, Xelor, the President stated last night from Paris that "Most people would have taken that meeting."
So much for claiming total innocence on his part. He better be careful what he says--his foot is slipping....

When I saw our President make that remark to the world, I felt ashamed.
Just ashamed. Nothing else to say.

Keep waiting oldlady....you are going to see a lot more people who took that meeting with this same lawyer......this story is just starting and it is going to bite the democrats on the ass...again...
The Clinton team met with her to get oppo research against themselves?
 
What is more disturbing that in an attempt to help a Russian Money Launderer, Barry and Loretta bypassed Obama's US Immigration Department's Visa Denial - refusal to allow this Russian lawyer, iving her instead a speial entry into the US. Add in the fact that Hillary's lawyer acted as this Russian lawyer's chaperone, and you have a troubling matter.

This Russian lawyer also turns out to be a lobbyist for Russian-US adoptions who also met with Cingressmen and the media.

But why was Barry and Loretta ignoring Immigration's ban into the US for this lawyer in order to help a Russian Money Launderer?

If Barry had not bypassed his own Dept of Inmigration's refusal to let this lawyer into the country, if Barry and Loretta would not have been helping a Russian money launderer win a case against Loretta's DOJ, there would have been no meetig between Jr and the lawyer.
Did you already see my post on why she was allowed an extension? If not, look back a bit.
 
Why did Obama's DOJ let this Russian lawyer in the country without a VISA?
Steve_McGarrett, she was in the process of defending a client based in NYC who was being prosecuted by the DOJ. The case had already started; you don't put the client in a situation where they need new counsel unless you want the case put on "hold" for many months while new counsel is found and brought up to speed. More sensible for all involved to let her stay so they could wrap up the case. It's not a lie--if you look at one of the later e-mails in Trump Jr.'s chain, it mentions she will be in court until 3 p.m. She was actively on that case.

Anyway, her visa had expired and they gave her the special extension so she could finish the court case.
There is no documented proof of a special extension.
 
Why did Obama's DOJ let this Russian lawyer in the country without a VISA?
Steve_McGarrett, she was in the process of defending a client based in NYC who was being prosecuted by the DOJ. The case had already started; you don't put the client in a situation where they need new counsel unless you want the case put on "hold" for many months while new counsel is found and brought up to speed. More sensible for all involved to let her stay so they could wrap up the case. It's not a lie--if you look at one of the later e-mails in Trump Jr.'s chain, it mentions she will be in court until 3 p.m. She was actively on that case.

Anyway, her visa had expired and they gave her the special extension so she could finish the court case.
There is no documented proof of a special extension.
Okay, if you want to shut your eyes, I guess I don't blame you.
 
Well, just as icing on the cake, Xelor, the President stated last night from Paris that "Most people would have taken that meeting."
So much for claiming total innocence on his part. He better be careful what he says--his foot is slipping....

When I saw our President make that remark to the world, I felt ashamed.
Just ashamed. Nothing else to say.
I hear you.

I heard him jejunely say that and I thought "Tu quoque, you fatuously presumptive porcine SOS!"
 
What is more disturbing that in an attempt to help a Russian Money Launderer, Barry and Loretta bypassed Obama's US Immigration Department's Visa Denial - refusal to allow this Russian lawyer, iving her instead a speial entry into the US. Add in the fact that Hillary's lawyer acted as this Russian lawyer's chaperone, and you have a troubling matter.

This Russian lawyer also turns out to be a lobbyist for Russian-US adoptions who also met with Cingressmen and the media.

But why was Barry and Loretta ignoring Immigration's ban into the US for this lawyer in order to help a Russian Money Launderer?

If Barry had not bypassed his own Dept of Inmigration's refusal to let this lawyer into the country, if Barry and Loretta would not have been helping a Russian money launderer win a case against Loretta's DOJ, there would have been no meetig between Jr and the lawyer.
Russian Money Launderer?
Hillary's lawyer acted as this Russian lawyer's chaperone

Really? You got a link to that with actual facts?
 
lk070917dAPR.jpg


Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), speaking Martha MacCallum on Fox News Tuesday, said that he was disturbed by the details in the emails disclosed by Donald Trump Jr., and not so much about what actually happened at the meeting.




MacCallum asked Gowdy, "So in terms of this Donald Trump Jr. story that’s out there today, are you troubled by any of it?"

Gowdy replied:

Yeah, I’m troubled on three levels. Number one, the legal level, but I think that’s Bob Mueller’s lane. [On] the political level, Martha, here we are beginning another week, this one in July with a new revelation about Russia. And the third, which is more of a medical issue is the amnesia of the people that are in the Trump orbit. Someone close to the president needs to get everyone connected with that campaign in a room and say from the time you saw "Doctor Zhivago" until the moment you drank vodka with a guy named "Boris," you list every single one of those and we’re gonna turn them over to the special counsel.
“Are you concerned that there was an effort to influence this campaign with regard to changing that,” MacCallum then asked, “or to find a sympathetic ear on that?”

Gowdy replied:
I’m not nearly as concerned with that. I’m much more concerned with the purported reason of the meeting as opposed to the real reason. The purported reason was for an agent of a foreign power to try to influence our election. That concerns me more than someone trying to sit down with a member of perhaps an incoming administration to lobby for a policy change.

I’m much more concerned with the words of the actual email than the real reason she wanted to meet,” he said.​

“Which words in the email disturb you?” MacCallum asked.

Gowdy replied
Russian governments’ efforts to help the Trump campaign, official documents.​

Well, butter my butt and call me a biscuit! Gowdy may well be Trump's "Cronkite." I can't think of any elected official who's been more of a lickspittle to Trump than Trey Gowdy. Gowdy has long been one of the few sharp witted and acerbic defenders of all things Trump. Well, that too has now come to pass.

The fact of the matter is that the disclosures Gowdy admonishes Trump's team to make should long ago have been made.

Screen-Shot-2017-07-12-at-11.05.21-AM-804x519-fdf818b.png

The June 2016 sit-down with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya was first brought to government officials’ attention when it was listed among the foreign contacts on Kushner’s amended application for a top-level security clearance, according to the New York Times. Kushner had initially omitted all of his meetings with foreign nationals from his SF-86, the questionnaire all applicants for national security clearances must fill out.

How many foreign contacts must one omit from their SF-86 forms to lose their security clearance immediately? Why hasn't Kushner's clearance been terminated? Why haven't all the individuals who, by dint of their convenient omissions of explicitly requesting information, pose a security risk been removed from the WH, at least temporarily sequestered from it and all it does even if not permanently?

Kushner managed to "forget" more foreign contacts than he listed, since he listed exactly zero. I mean, really. Who'd have known that Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, the head of a U.S.-sanctioned Russian state-run bank or a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer are "individuals associated with a foreign business or other foreign organization" that also did not employ Kushner? Is it that one or more of those individuals or the organizations for which they worked did employ Kushner; he listed them in a different section of the form? The answer: NOBODY!

Be that as it may, what's certain is that no asset of a foreign government would on an SF-86 list congresses with known or suspected operatives of that government. And how many times did Kushner submitted his SF-86? Three times!
  • First, the inaccurate form, which left blank the foreign contacts section.
  • Next (and the next day), the form was amended to say that he had multiple contacts and would disclose those. The process of gathering information progressed throughout the winter and spring.

    Really? It took the winter and spring to gather the scant bits of information the form requests? Does Kushner truly not have a calendar and an email program? I don't put every meeting I attend in my calendar, but the ones I and my boss will together attend surely does make it onto my calendar, if only to facilitate my ensuring I carve out adequate time for preparing for and traveling to and from the meeting. I'm sorry, but no senior principal is going to buy that it legitimately takes that long to gather such basic information.
  • Then the form was amended yet again to include the Trump Jr. meeting as soon as it was discovered, a source with knowledge of the process told CNN.
Of course Gowdy isn't terribly concerned about the fact that Russians attempted to influence the campaign or the election's outcome. Anyone with the barest awareness of how the Russians do things is well aware the Russians will at least try to do something of that nature. He rightly is concerned that highly placed Trump campaign, now Trump Administration, players:
  • Didn't comprehend the nature of how the Russians do things and in their zeal went ahead with the meetings and whatever disclosures may have resulted from them.

    This may be possible re: Trump, Jr., particularly if he's literally as stupid as his father, but not Manafort, who also was in attendance. That said, just how oblivious or unpatriotic must one be not to know that discussing anything with Russians officials and their known cut-outs is a "no-no?"
  • Did comprehend the nature of what they were potentially getting into and, in their zeal to win, didn't give a damn and forged onward.

    This is definitely something that could very well have been the case with Manafort, whom I would not be surprised to find that he's a witting or unwitting Russian asset, so deep are his ties to Russian officials.
From Gowdy's remarks, which are the point of this post/thread, it seems that even he has reached the point of realizing the nation will be better off without Trump, his court, its jesters, and his cronies at the helm. He's clearly no longer seeing the lipstick and denying that our porcine president, Trump, is not a pig.

morin_t810.gif


Yeah.. Right On !!! The part I'm troubled about is that Don Jr is NOT SUBJECT to WH access clearances. Probably has much lower clearances. Because Don Jr is not PART of the Admin. Can't be. Runs Trump Enterprises. So the one re-filing the Form 86 (and others you'll never see) is Kushner. Who had to disclose this contact because he had access to the details of this set-up meeting during the campaign.

And the part that disturbs ME is that all this info goes to the FBI. WHERE IT WAS LEAKED to NY Times. If my applications were ever subject to leaks -- I'd have a Holy Cow.

Here's the problem with this deal that NO ONE in the media is gonna analyze for you. The BAD JUDGEMENT and lack of discretion on the part of Don Jr is certainly visible here. Even discussing the set-up of the meeting should have been a Red Flag (literally).. But I UNDERSTAND. Because at the time, ALL of the people involved were private citizens who NEVER HAD clearances and were never BRIEFED into the ways of foreign espionage and what to look for. They had NO sensitivity to how much fuss and paperwork is involved with "foreign meetings".. So they were NAIVE and "security virgins".

NO PERSON who has been cleared and read into secure programs would EVER take that bait without protecting themselves by disclosing it BEFOREHAND to their "security officer"...

This is simply what happens in campaigns where MOST people are civilians and outsiders and don't REALIZE the implications of such an "offered bait"... NO campaign should be run without adequate # of people who hold or HAVE held security clearances. And they should be the go-to for advice before ANY foreign contacts are made..


Naive is a defense for someone who goes in a c store with his buddy to get a beer and the buddy decided to rob and murder the clerk. Naive won't get it here, he did it to get dirt.


I think that in terms of "being ready for prime time" in the political and governance game, Don Jr. is but a deer in the headlights. Now Kushner and Manfort are not; both are formally trained lawyers, and Manafort has scads of experience running political campaigns. (What he might not have is tons of experience dealing with shady sons of bitches like Donald Trump.) At a minimum, both are well aware of the laws that were potentially about to be broken by having the meeting with Ms. V. (the Russian lawyer).

As campaign chairman, what the hell was Manafort's job but to, among other things, protect campaign staffers from their own naivete? That's part of any senior leader's and manager's job. Managers, principals, doesn't let their people make stupid mistakes because they don't know any better. Competent managers think about the risks and make the call about whether they will permit their people to undertake a given course of action.



And yet......john podesta, another political operative actually does have ties to actual Russians.....while he was campaign chairman to hilary.....and the democrats actually did collude with Ukraine against the Trump campaign.....was he not aware of the problems with doing that?


Yes.......it is becoming clear that the democrats were the real colluders with Russia...not to mention they tried to set up Donald Jr. all this b.s. is simply an effort by the democrats and their misguided followers to keep Trump from implementing the changes that America needs to recover from the stupid actions of the obama administration....the democrats are thus comitting treason by working against the best interests of America with their so called 'resistance' movement a thingly disguised effort to engage in treason and insurrection.

You're missing the point by blaming the Democrats here, because it doesn't MATTER who set it up, if it was a sting*. What DOES matter is how the Trump team reacted. And is still reacting.

*I agree if the Dems can be caught with such dirty tactics, go for it. It is not as serious as what Don Jr. and team invited.
 
Well, just as icing on the cake, Xelor, the President stated last night from Paris that "Most people would have taken that meeting."
So much for claiming total innocence on his part. He better be careful what he says--his foot is slipping....

When I saw our President make that remark to the world, I felt ashamed.
Just ashamed. Nothing else to say.
I hear you.

I heard him jejunely say that and I thought "Tu quoque, you fatuously presumptive porcine SOS!"
:eusa_eh: You speaking a furrin' language again, Xelor?
LOL
 
What is more disturbing that in an attempt to help a Russian Money Launderer, Barry and Loretta bypassed Obama's US Immigration Department's Visa Denial - refusal to allow this Russian lawyer, iving her instead a speial entry into the US. Add in the fact that Hillary's lawyer acted as this Russian lawyer's chaperone, and you have a troubling matter.

This Russian lawyer also turns out to be a lobbyist for Russian-US adoptions who also met with Cingressmen and the media.

But why was Barry and Loretta ignoring Immigration's ban into the US for this lawyer in order to help a Russian Money Launderer?

If Barry had not bypassed his own Dept of Inmigration's refusal to let this lawyer into the country, if Barry and Loretta would not have been helping a Russian money launderer win a case against Loretta's DOJ, there would have been no meetig between Jr and the lawyer.
Russian Money Launderer?
Hillary's lawyer acted as this Russian lawyer's chaperone

Really? You got a link to that with actual facts?
YOU can LOOK BACK at the links I posted.
 

Forum List

Back
Top