Transgenderism: Psychology, Society, or Science?

TemplarKormac

Political Atheist
Mar 30, 2013
51,306
14,402
2,190
The Land of Sanctuary
Democrats insist on telling us that you are the gender you think you are. They ignore the idea that the science determined your sex, thus your gender, at birth. Gender is a social construct, sex is a scientific fact. Without the scientific fact, there is no societal construct.

If gender is a social construct, would transgenderism also be nothing more than a construct? Would any gender surgery be based on a societal definition as opposed to the science surrounding the determination of biological sex at birth?

If transgenderism is a social construct that runs contrary to the scientific definition of sex, does that not qualify as a psychological disorder instead of a reason to mutilate your body to meet the directions of a society that thinks you are the gender you think you are as opposed to the sex you were born as?
 
Last edited:
The solution is simple, but not profitable enough for the charlatans of the transgender industry to ever accept. All a transgender, or gender fluid, or gender-whatever person need do is accept what the left has been telling us: gender and sex are two different ideas.

You were born with a biological male body, but you feel like a woman? It's your life, live it how you please. Dress up, make up, pad up, practice in size eleven high heels. Present yourself as a woman.

Just don't mutilate yourself to do it. Find a heterosexual man who likes women with penises. Apparently the relatively smaller number of men who fall in that category make up for their smaller numbers with their enthusiasm for transwomen.


In other words, you will have no trouble finding a man to whom you can honestly sing, "you make me feel like a natural wo-oman." I would have to think that you would be much more successful finding such a man than if you tried to find a man who prefers women with mutilated penises converted into nasty-looking imitations of vaginas.

Obviously, this option is already available to anyone, and the same principle can apply to biological females who believe their gender to be man. So, what's my point?

We should be encouraging people who express that they are transgender to go this route instead of automatically referring them to psychiatrists whose bread and butter is prescribing hormone treatments and referring patients (with "appropriate" fee-splitting) to surgeons whose bread and butter is phalloplasty or vaginoplasty. Once in contact with such a practitioner, it is unlikely that the transgender person will ever hear any advice other than the medical equivalent of "DO IT! DO IT! DO IT!"
 
Do we ignore the science and proliferate the delusion, or do we treat the delusions and obey the science?
We have to be "tolerant" & "accept their choices" in the name of diversity.
Meanwhile, in real life, people with gender dysphoria commit suicide at rates that would make your head spin.
Leftist enabling is literally killing people
 
This is primarily a policy that destroys society. A convenient slave is a disabled person, handicapped sexually, mentally and physically, feminism, transgenderism and other plagues will allow European elites to come to power again and recreate the matriarchal society of the Neolithic
 
We have to be "tolerant" & "accept their choices" in the name of diversity.
But when the tolerance defies the science, how can one party claim they trust science when they trust the delusions of a transgender individual more than the science itself?

Essentially, it's political doublespeak.
 
Last edited:
This is primarily a policy that destroys society. A convenient slave is a disabled person, handicapped sexually, mentally and physically, feminism, transgenderism and other plagues will allow European elites to come to power again and recreate the matriarchal society of the Neolithic
That's some impressive babble there
 
We should be encouraging people who express that they are transgender to go this route instead of automatically referring them to psychiatrists whose bread and butter is prescribing hormone treatments and referring patients (with "appropriate" fee-splitting) to surgeons whose bread and butter is phalloplasty or vaginoplasty. Once in contact with such a practitioner, it is unlikely that the transgender person will ever hear any advice other than the medical equivalent of "DO IT! DO IT! DO IT!"

Not only would be furthering the delusion, but we would also be causing more mental degradation by making them live with something their delusion tells them isn't what they are, or what's between their legs.

Treat the delusion. Avoid the physical and mental pain.
 
Not only would be furthering the delusion, but we would also be causing more mental degradation by making them live with something their delusion tells them isn't what they are, or what's between their legs.

Treat the delusion. Avoid the physical and mental pain.
"Treat the delusion," by force?

You are aware that being gay was once also classified as a mental disorder, until the APA was pressured to change the definition of the term "mental disorder?"
 
"Treat the delusion," by force?

You are aware that being gay was once also classified as a mental disorder, until the APA was pressured to change the definition of the term "mental disorder?"
Force? No. Make it readily available. Make it okay for a transgender person to think "there's something wrong with me and I want to get it fixed."

Why is the only solution simply allowing them to proceed with the delusion when they can be given the option to live with it OR treat it?

Why propagate the stigma that if you doubt transgenderism or want it to be treated that you are betraying yourself or being bigoted toward transgenders?
 
Last edited:
"Treat the delusion," by force?

You are aware that being gay was once also classified as a mental disorder, until the APA was pressured to change the definition of the term "mental disorder?"
Being gay is not psychological, it's natural. There are plenty of examples of it in nature outside of our species.

APA is ignoring science.
 
Democrats insist on telling us that you are the gender you think you are. They ignore the idea that the science determined your sex, thus your gender, at birth. Gender is a social construct, sex is a scientific fact. Without the scientific fact, there is no societal construct.

If gender is a social construct, would transgenderism also be nothing more than a construct? Would any gender surgery be based on a societal definition as opposed to the science surrounding the determination of biological sex at birth?

If transgenderism is a social construct that runs contrary to the scientific definition of sex, does that not qualify as a psychological disorder instead of a reason to mutilate your body to meet the directions of a society that thinks you are the gender you think you are as opposed to the sex you were born as?
Democrats insist on telling us that you are the gender you think you are. They ignore the idea that the science determined your sex, thus your gender, at birth. Gender is a social construct, sex is a scientific fact. Without the scientific fact, there is no societal construct.

If gender is a social construct, would transgenderism also be nothing more than a construct? Would any gender surgery be based on a societal definition as opposed to the science surrounding the determination of biological sex at birth?

If transgenderism is a social construct that runs contrary to the scientific definition of sex, does that not qualify as a psychological disorder instead of a reason to mutilate your body to meet the directions of a society that thinks you are the gender you think you are as opposed to the sex you were born as?
I'd say transgenderism is more politically induced so it would best be classified under a political heading than the other three headings mentioned in your post.
 

Forum List

Back
Top