Mr. Friscus
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2020
- 5,908
- 6,242
- 1,938
Here’s how The Guardian summarized the results of a review of “more than 100 follow-up studies of post-operative transsexuals” by Birmingham University’s Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility:So in conclusion 200% decreases are a thing in context. Thanks for conceding.
[The Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility], which conducts reviews of health care treatments for the [National Health Service], concludes that none of the studies provides conclusive evidence that gender reassignment is beneficial for patients. It found that most research was poorly designed, which skewed the results in favor of physically changing sex. There was no evaluation of whether other treatments, such as long-term counseling, might help transsexuals, or whether their gender confusion might lessen over time.
Overall, the quality and strength of evidence were low due to mostly observational study designs with no comparison groups, subjective endpoints, potential confounding (a situation where the association between the intervention and outcome is influenced by another factor such as a co-intervention), small sample sizes, lack of validated assessment tools, and considerable lost to follow-up.
NCA - Gender Dysphoria and Gender Reassignment Surgery (CAG-00446N) - Decision Memo
Use this page to view details for the decision Memo for Gender Dysphoria and Gender Reassignment Surgery (CAG-00446N).
www.cms.gov
Basically, you're consistently relying on activist studies that are seeking an outcome and aren't objective, are using improper methods, etc.
No wonder you're so off.