Not an opinion. With all the desparate [sic] attempts to a biological basis for transgenderism, all they've come up with is inconculive [sic] studies that "suggest" similarities in the brains of people with gender dysphoria and biological individuals of the opposite sex.
It's kind of interesting, here.
These studies about supposed differences between
“male brains” and
“female brains”, at best, are very vague.
I don't think anyone denies that there are certain personality traits that are more likely found to be in men, and some that are more likely found to be in women, but until recently, nobody would have ever thought of suggesting that a man who possesses traits that are more in line with those associated with femininity might really be a woman.
A difference in taste between my wife and I, as far as our preferences in entertainment comes to mind.
My wife likes horror movies. I don't particularly care for them.
I like romantic comedies. My wife doesn't care much for them.
So here's an area in which my wife's personality tends to be more masculine than mine. You'd expect a man to be more into horror movies, and not so much into romantic comedies, deigning to watch them only because his wife wants to.
Yet nobody who knows either of us would ever question my masculinity nor her femininity.
There alleged differences between
“male brains” and
“female brains” can only be detected using very advanced technology, and at best, are vague and inconclusive.
Meanwhile, the morphological differences between men and women are very plain and obvious, and require no artificial technology at all to see.
For all the time that Mankind has existed, we've known the difference between men and women, based on obvious physical traits. To put that aside, and try to change the definitions of male and female based on these vague, claimed brain differences, makes no sense at all.
If I were single, and looking for a wife, I wouldn't ask to see the brain scans of any candidate, to determine whether she might be a suitable wife for me. If
“she” happened to have obviously male morphology, I would not be the least swayed into considering
“her” as a possible mate, if
“she” were to show me a scan that proved that
“she” had a
“female brain”.
A question to pose to anyone defending the madness of
“transgenderism” would be to ask, assuming he/she is single and looking for a mate, would he/she consider a
“transgender” person who presents as the sex that one desires as a mate, to be a realistic candidate? Would a man consider a
“trans woman” to be viable wife material? Would a woman consider a
“trans man” to be viable husband material?
I sure as Hell would not. I bet even the most ardent defenders of these freaks would, if pressed, have to admit to the same thing. When it comes to a spouse, they want the real thing, and would not settle for a poor imitation.