"Transgender" Fail; Next Up: Reverse Obergefell.. How Interracial Marriage Differs From Gay Marriage

Do you agree that Obergefell needs revisiting per New York vs Ferber?

  • Yes, gay marriage isn't like interracial marriage. Children deserve a mother and father in marriage

  • No, children's concerns don't matter in marriage. Behaviors are protected in the same way as race.


Results are only viewable after voting.

Silhouette

Gold Member
Jul 15, 2013
25,815
1,938
265
Inspired from here: Enough of this transgender nonsense. Post #1042
Rights granted go forwards, not backwards. Gay marriage is like legal interracial marriage....
Yes, the rights granted in New York vs Ferber go forward. Gay marriage is not anything like interracial marriage where New York vs Ferber's conclusion is concerned. Interracial marriage still provided a mother and father to children. Gay marriage is the first type of marriage EVER to divorce children of either a mother or father...for life...

So, the rights going forward in New York vs Ferber will square off with the "rights going forward" in Obergefell. Like the 17 million rape survivors in this shower/bathroom debate, untold millions of children will have their day in court on whether or not it is cruel and unusual to divorce them from even hope of having a mother or father for life.

This is how gay marriage is in no way, shape or form like interracial marriage. It bears a physical defect to the detriment of children that interracial marriage does not.

New York vs Ferber (USSC1982) Found that if a person's "rights" interfere with the physical or mental well being of children, those rights cannot be exercised in that way. The only question left to answer in the Obergefell challenge, after we clarify that "gay" and "transgender" are mere behavioral aberrations, is "is divorcing a child via contract of even the hope of a mother or father for life either mentally or physically harmful to them?"

When the dust has settled from the men-pretending-to-be women using women's showers lawsuit has been clarified and settled, revisiting Obergefell from a child's perspective is next..
 
NEW SAN FRANCISCO POLICE CHIEF INHERITS CITY DIVIDED BY RACE

article

So, how's this integration thing working out?
 
NEW SAN FRANCISCO POLICE CHIEF INHERITS CITY DIVIDED BY RACE

article

So, how's this integration thing working out?

Was in San Francisco not to long ago in a public building where whites and blacks were waiting to conduct business. The waiting area was like oil and water. Whites avoided blacks and blacks avoided whites. There were only a couple of seats left in the waiting area and they were next to a couple of black folks. So my friend and I just strolled up, sat down and smiled at them and began reading magazines. First they avoided our gaze altogether. The other blacks nearby looked over with a look I can only describe as "are you serious? you must not be from around here." Then the black folks next to us began to squirm and fidget. Then they physically turned their bodies away as far as they could in the other direction. The whites on the other side of the room looked over at us like we had just landed from Mars. You could cut the tension in the air with a knife.
 
But again, race and sexual or delusional behaviors have nothing to do with one another for the purposes of how just gay marriage by defect strips children of either a mother or father for life. That's not going to go quietly into the night folks.
 
But again, race and sexual or delusional behaviors have nothing to do with one another for the purposes of how just gay marriage by defect strips children of either a mother or father for life. That's not going to go quietly into the night folks.

Being divorced or a singe parent does the same exact thing. Funny how that standard doesn't apply to you, though. You're still in the denial stage when it comes to gay marriage. Get over it!
 
But again, race and sexual or delusional behaviors have nothing to do with one another for the purposes of how just gay marriage by defect strips children of either a mother or father for life. That's not going to go quietly into the night folks.

Being divorced or a singe parent does the same exact thing. Funny how that standard doesn't apply to you, though. You're still in the denial stage when it comes to gay marriage. Get over it!

Not by binding contract it doesn't... A child of a single parent isn't bound away as a matter of law from ever seeing the complimentary parent. Marriage perks exist in every state to entice that single parent to provide the compliment-parent to children involved. Neither is a child of divorce bound away. In fact, a child of divorce sees the court bending over backwards to be sure the child stays in contact with both his or her mother and father.

Marriage was brought into existence in fact to keep a child or children already around or to arrive in contact with both a mother and father. "Gay marriage" for the first time in human history, binds either mother or father AWAY from those children for life.
 
But again, race and sexual or delusional behaviors have nothing to do with one another for the purposes of how just gay marriage by defect strips children of either a mother or father for life. That's not going to go quietly into the night folks.

Being divorced or a singe parent does the same exact thing. Funny how that standard doesn't apply to you, though. You're still in the denial stage when it comes to gay marriage. Get over it!

Not by binding contract it doesn't... A child of a single parent isn't bound away as a matter of law from ever seeing the complimentary parent. Neither is a child of divorce. In fact, a child of divorce sees the court bending over backwards to be sure the child stays in contact with both his or her parents.

What lame word salad. The court can't force a parent to see their children, but they can force them to pay for their children. You're twisting in the wind...again. Either way, you can't do shit about gays marrying and raising their children. Fact!
 
What lame word salad. The court can't force a parent to see their children, but they can force them to pay for their children. You're twisting in the wind...again. Either way, you can't do shit about gays marrying and raising their children. Fact!

Accusing a "word salad" mdk uses a word salad. Nobody spoke of a court forcing a parent to see children. Accusing "twisting in the wind", mdk twists in the wind.

The only fact that is concrete here is that gay marriage by unavoidable physical defect, and for the first time in human history, divorces a child from either a mother or father for the duration of contract (for life).
 
Queer smokes shit streaked cock. Gives birth to democrat.

Clinton denies all.
 
What lame word salad. The court can't force a parent to see their children, but they can force them to pay for their children. You're twisting in the wind...again. Either way, you can't do shit about gays marrying and raising their children. Fact!

Accusing a "word salad" mdk uses a word salad. Nobody spoke of a court forcing a parent to see children. Accusing "twisting in the wind", mdk twists in the wind.

The only fact that is concrete here is that gay marriage by unavoidable physical defect, and for the first time in human history, divorces a child from either a mother or father for the duration of contract (for life).

But I thought children had a right to a mother and father? Funny how that only applies to gay marriage and their families, but not to your family. Children are not a party to a marriage contract, in any state. Gay marriage is here to stay. Make peace with it. Or don't. You do not have any impact either way. Ta.
 
The butt fuckers and the cock chokers and fish mongers do not care about children. They only care about what looks good.
 
Looks like a flame war! Quick! Shut the thread down!!!

That again, really?
 
Poetry in motion you are not, nor will you ever be, unless it is the fluid grace with which you gag choad.
 
Well, at least you two are bumping the thread. I'll keep an eye out for any signs of manufacturing...
 

Forum List

Back
Top