Rush isn't an entertainer. If he was, he would appeal more to the liberal loons, whose only defense (since they can't argue his points or keep up with him otherwise) is to label him as *just* an entertainer.
He's not an entertainer at all. He is what he says he is, an educator and interpretor, a person who has created his own niche and whose purpose is to expose liberal insanity and uphold traditional American values.
He comes from a strong, intelligent family and he is doing exactly what he means to do.
But the small minded, mean spirited left will continue to jeer because that's all they've got. And each time they do, they just make him look better in comparison.
He is of course a master propagandist.
Limbaugh likes to bill himself as an "entertainer," but he is more accurately understood as a propagandist. He shows no interest in actually furthering the public debate: opposing views are rarely if ever invited onto his show, and when they are they invariably receive the kind of ham-handed mistreatment that has become common on Limbaugh's television counterpart, Bill O'Reilly's Fox talk show.
And there can be little doubt as to the effectiveness of Limbaugh's propaganda: In the intervening years, it has become an object of faith, particularly in rural America where Limbaugh's broadcasts can often be heard multiple times throughout the day, that the government is in itself evil, a corrupt entity, something to be distrusted and feared, and certainly incapable of actually solving problems.
Now that the president he supported -- George W. Bush -- is running the show, however, Limbaugh's anti-government bent has faded quickly and quietly to the background. After all, being anti-government seems practically anti-Republican these days, considering the GOP owns all three branches of government and virtually controls the Fourth Estate as well.
Rush, Newspeak and Fascism: An exegesis: I: Projecting Fascism
He doesn't bill himself as an entertainer, and he's not a propagandist either, you nitwit. A propagandist is what YOU are...propaganda is spreading hatred via outrageous lies packaged as truth.
Rush doesn't lie, he exposes.
He uses the words of the politicians themselves and does the research that exposes their actions. That's not propaganda. Sorry.
Your article, however, is.


He does not! He uses his own words or even makes up quotes. And he has a pat rationalization for his out of context or made up quotes to create the context he wants, which he denies ever doing and condemns others for doing.
September 5, 2008
RUSH: He didn't use those words, but that's what he meant
October 21, 2008
RUSH: He didn't say it in those words, but that's exactly what he meant.
Caller Brands Rush a Liar, But Can't Cite One Lie
October 5, 2007
CALLER:
Have you ever taken anybody out of context before, any liberals?
RUSH:
Not on purpose, never, ever, do I do things like that. I'll tell you why, Bob. The reason why is because I'm trying to generate informed, educated people. I want them to be voting and spreading the word on the basis of truth and legitimacy, so there's a proper foundation for it to spread. I am not afraid of the opposition and what they think. I'm happy for everybody to know what the opposition thinks. I try to explain liberalism as best I can, as often as I can on this program. But
I don't purposely take people out of context, no, don't do any of that. Bob, a program like mine, ranking number one so many years could not survive on all the things that you people, bleeding your clichés, think happen. There's no hate on this program. There's no bigotry on this program; there's no racism; there's no sexism; there's no homophobia; none of that on this program. Those are myths that people like you have been led to believe by people who are trying to discredit me. None of that's true.
Here he is making up a quote from a LAUGH!!!!
October 4, 2007
RUSH: She laughs because she doesn't like the question. "
Mrs. Clinton's laugh is a signal to the guy asking her the question:
'Do you like your testicles attached, or do you want them in my lockbox?'"
And here he is condemning others for what he does while decrying a double standard. Priceless!
July 6, 2010
RUSH:
What bothers me and always has bothered me
is a double standard.
October 3, 2007
RUSH: We've reached a new day,
when interpreters are allowed to determine the meaning of words spoken by others. What happens with that is the loss of meaning.
November 12, 2009
RUSH:
Aren't you people fortunate you have me to interpret this stuff for you?
That was fun, how about another one.
July 6, 2010
RUSH:
What bothers me and always has bothered me
is a double standard.
October 4, 2007
RUSH:
They don't get to determine what I was thinking,... This is the loss of meaning.
June 22, 2011
RUSH:
He didn't say that but we know that's what he thinks.