Traffic stop turns into never-ending ordeal because screaming banshee simply shouts down officer non-stop and won't let officers do their job.

[progressive hunter]

How do you reason with a screeching lunatic like the woman in this video? She simply shouts the officer down over and over again so the woman can not do her job. The kid ran a stop sign, refused to pull over until he got to his house, pulled over on the wrong side of the road. The police officer asked him if he is on parole or probation and the kid's mother answered for him before he could and simply kept demanding the cop give the ticket and leave. The police officer kept trying to explain that the young man has to answer the questions himself. Finally, the officer called for backup. The woman should have been arrested.

Officer's bodycam



Police car dashcam



The whole video is ridiculous. I have been stopped by a police officer for walking on the side of the highway by myself. The cop asked me a few questions and patted me down on the side of the road after I consented. All he did was ask for my ID, asked where I was headed and what I was up to, asked if I was on probation or parole, where I worked, how long I had been at the address on my license, how long I planned on living in the town, if I had ever been in trouble with the law, and how things were going in life. When the other patrol car arrived, that officer took over the interrogation. The original officer then ran my information and when everything came back OK, they let me go with a warning to stay out of trouble. All of that took took not much more than 5 minutes. Things go much smoother and much more quickly if you simply cooperate rather than get defiant and act like a screaming lunatic.

Women about to be dragged back into the kitchen

Now abortionists will be charged with murder

Now the election will be declared a fraud and John Roberts cannot now stop trump from stopping the deep state

Now a 4 to 4 tie cannot stop trump from totally destroying the crooked democrats and deep state

wrong thread jr,,,

 

[RandomPoster]

You do HAVE to answer questions relating to the offense you committed or you can be arrested He was required to answer and his mon should have been arrested.

NO!
You most certainly do NOT ever have to answer ANY question related to a possible offense, without your lawyer being pressent.
You do have to show your license, registration, and proof of insurance, and that is all.

And the mom is SUPPOSED to prevent any further questioning.

He is required to either answer the question or refuse to answer at all. His mom was trying to create a situation where he had to do neither.

 

[justinacolmena]

All those cops to support the ego of one revenue collector. All the revenue collector had to do is write the ticket.

The cops are stuck between a rock and a hard place here. When they coerce so many teenage girls into prostitution, they need a convenient foolproof way to get the teenage boys off the streets. A felony sentence of several years in prison for a minor traffic violation is a very common and effective way to do it. No wonder the cops are pissing off the Wall of Moms and other groups.

 

[progressive hunter]

All those cops to support the ego of one revenue collector. All the revenue collector had to do is write the ticket.

The cops are stuck between a rock and a hard place here. When they coerce so many teenage girls into prostitution, they need a convenient foolproof way to get the teenage boys off the streets. A felony sentence of several years in prison for a minor traffic violation is a very common and effective way to do it. No wonder the cops are pissing off the Wall of Moms and other groups.

ya got a little bit of crazy going on there,,,,

 

[justinacolmena]

ya got a little bit of crazy going on there,,,

Not really. We've got medieval doctors running mental health slaughterhouses and imposing civil commitment and other conditions to coerce their unethical and bizarre treatments by involuntary administration of controlled substances.

 

[AZrailwhale]

How do you reason with a screeching lunatic like the woman in this video? She simply shouts the officer down over and over again so the woman can not do her job. The kid ran a stop sign, refused to pull over until he got to his house, pulled over on the wrong side of the road. The police officer asked him if he is on parole or probation and the kid's mother answered for him before he could and simply kept demanding the cop give the ticket and leave. The police officer kept trying to explain that the young man has to answer the questions himself. Finally, the officer called for backup. The woman should have been arrested.

Officer's bodycam



Police car dashcam



The whole video is ridiculous. I have been stopped by a police officer for walking on the side of the highway by myself. The cop asked me a few questions and patted me down on the side of the road after I consented. All he did was ask for my ID, asked where I was headed and what I was up to, asked if I was on probation or parole, where I worked, how long I had been at the address on my license, how long I planned on living in the town, if I had ever been in trouble with the law, and how things were going in life. When the other patrol car arrived, that officer took over the interrogation. The original officer then ran my information and when everything came back OK, they let me go with a warning to stay out of trouble. All of that took took not much more than 5 minutes. Things go much smoother and much more quickly if you simply cooperate rather than get defiant and act like a screaming lunatic.

That's nice.
You do realize you are under no legal obligation to answer any questions, right?


(BTW, video links don't work)

You do have a legal obligation to identify yourself.

 

[justinacolmena]

You are required to identify yourself if you're suspected of committing an offense. You don't have to answer any other questions.

That's a little bit tall and heavy, too, isn't it? A felony mug shot for some lane change etiquette, a flat tire, or failure to signal a turn continuously for the required 300 feet.

 

[freyasman]

How do you reason with a screeching lunatic like the woman in this video? She simply shouts the officer down over and over again so the woman can not do her job. The kid ran a stop sign, refused to pull over until he got to his house, pulled over on the wrong side of the road. The police officer asked him if he is on parole or probation and the kid's mother answered for him before he could and simply kept demanding the cop give the ticket and leave. The police officer kept trying to explain that the young man has to answer the questions himself. Finally, the officer called for backup. The woman should have been arrested.

Officer's bodycam



Police car dashcam



The whole video is ridiculous. I have been stopped by a police officer for walking on the side of the highway by myself. The cop asked me a few questions and patted me down on the side of the road after I consented. All he did was ask for my ID, asked where I was headed and what I was up to, asked if I was on probation or parole, where I worked, how long I had been at the address on my license, how long I planned on living in the town, if I had ever been in trouble with the law, and how things were going in life. When the other patrol car arrived, that officer took over the interrogation. The original officer then ran my information and when everything came back OK, they let me go with a warning to stay out of trouble. All of that took took not much more than 5 minutes. Things go much smoother and much more quickly if you simply cooperate rather than get defiant and act like a screaming lunatic.

That's nice.
You do realize you are under no legal obligation to answer any questions, right?


(BTW, video links don't work)

You do have a legal obligation to identify yourself.

Only if there are specific articulable facts in evidence that would lead a reasonable person to believe a crime is being, has been, or is about to be committed.
If a cop simply walks up and asks for ID, you are under no legal obligation to provide it.

 

[progressive hunter]

How do you reason with a screeching lunatic like the woman in this video? She simply shouts the officer down over and over again so the woman can not do her job. The kid ran a stop sign, refused to pull over until he got to his house, pulled over on the wrong side of the road. The police officer asked him if he is on parole or probation and the kid's mother answered for him before he could and simply kept demanding the cop give the ticket and leave. The police officer kept trying to explain that the young man has to answer the questions himself. Finally, the officer called for backup. The woman should have been arrested.

Officer's bodycam



Police car dashcam



The whole video is ridiculous. I have been stopped by a police officer for walking on the side of the highway by myself. The cop asked me a few questions and patted me down on the side of the road after I consented. All he did was ask for my ID, asked where I was headed and what I was up to, asked if I was on probation or parole, where I worked, how long I had been at the address on my license, how long I planned on living in the town, if I had ever been in trouble with the law, and how things were going in life. When the other patrol car arrived, that officer took over the interrogation. The original officer then ran my information and when everything came back OK, they let me go with a warning to stay out of trouble. All of that took took not much more than 5 minutes. Things go much smoother and much more quickly if you simply cooperate rather than get defiant and act like a screaming lunatic.

That's nice.
You do realize you are under no legal obligation to answer any questions, right?


(BTW, video links don't work)

You do have a legal obligation to identify yourself.

Only if there are specific articulable facts in evidence that would lead a reasonable person to believe a crime is being, has been, or is about to be committed.
If a cop simply walks up and asks for ID, you are under no legal obligation to provide it.

in this case he was under arrest the minute she pulled him over,,,

 

[Rigby5]

You do HAVE to answer questions relating to the offense you committed or you can be arrested He was required to answer and his mon should have been arrested.

NO!
You most certainly do NOT ever have to answer ANY question related to a possible offense, without your lawyer being pressent.
You do have to show your license, registration, and proof of insurance, and that is all.

And the mom is SUPPOSED to prevent any further questioning.

if you are on probation or parole you are required to answer any and all questions or you go back to jail,,,

and the mother should have been arrested for interfering with a cop during an arrest,,,

It depends on if the person is on parole, and what kind of questions.
{...
The Rights of the Parolee
When a person progresses through an early release due to parole, he or she has fewer rights than before a conviction. The conditions of the release generally require certain aspects that are in direct conflict with the rights of a United States citizen. These may include searches and seizures of property without a warrant, questioning the person without the need for suspicion of illegal activity and many other issues. The rights are greatly diminished than before prison was a factor for the person. Knowing what rights still exist may depend on the state and the specific circumstances.
...}

However there is no indication this kid was on parole or probation. so then it was correct for the mother to prevent further interrogation.
If the cop tries to continue interrogation through coercion. that is illegal and the mother has the authority to arrest the cop.

 

[Rigby5]

You do HAVE to answer questions relating to the offense you committed or you can be arrested He was required to answer and his mon should have been arrested.

NO!
You most certainly do NOT ever have to answer ANY question related to a possible offense, without your lawyer being pressent.
You do have to show your license, registration, and proof of insurance, and that is all.

And the mom is SUPPOSED to prevent any further questioning.

Again if the cop asks a question and you refuse to answer it CAN in fact be a reason to place that individual under arrest. And yes the mom obstructed by repeatedly drowning out the son and interfering with law enforcement.

ONLY if the person is on parole and signed a consent form to allow such questioning.
Normally such questioning is illegal without a lawyer present.
And it is perfectly LEGAL to interfere with a law enforcement officer who is violating the law by not allowing legal representation to be present.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You do HAVE to answer questions relating to the offense you committed or you can be arrested He was required to answer and his mon should have been arrested.

NO!
You most certainly do NOT ever have to answer ANY question related to a possible offense, without your lawyer being pressent.
You do have to show your license, registration, and proof of insurance, and that is all.

And the mom is SUPPOSED to prevent any further questioning.

Again if the cop asks a question and you refuse to answer it CAN in fact be a reason to place that individual under arrest. And yes the mom obstructed by repeatedly drowning out the son and interfering with law enforcement.

ONLY if the person is on parole and signed a consent form to allow such questioning.
Normally such questioning is illegal without a lawyer present.
And it is perfectly LEGAL to interfere with a law enforcement officer who is violating the law by not allowing legal representation to be present.

She was NOT stopping an illegal act you LOON. SHE was obstructing an officer from their appointed duties.

 

[progressive hunter]

You do HAVE to answer questions relating to the offense you committed or you can be arrested He was required to answer and his mon should have been arrested.

NO!
You most certainly do NOT ever have to answer ANY question related to a possible offense, without your lawyer being pressent.
You do have to show your license, registration, and proof of insurance, and that is all.

And the mom is SUPPOSED to prevent any further questioning.

if you are on probation or parole you are required to answer any and all questions or you go back to jail,,,

and the mother should have been arrested for interfering with a cop during an arrest,,,

It depends on if the person is on parole, and what kind of questions.
{...
The Rights of the Parolee
When a person progresses through an early release due to parole, he or she has fewer rights than before a conviction. The conditions of the release generally require certain aspects that are in direct conflict with the rights of a United States citizen. These may include searches and seizures of property without a warrant, questioning the person without the need for suspicion of illegal activity and many other issues. The rights are greatly diminished than before prison was a factor for the person. Knowing what rights still exist may depend on the state and the specific circumstances.
...}

However there is no indication this kid was on parole or probation. so then it was correct for the mother to prevent further interrogation.
If the cop tries to continue interrogation through coercion. that is illegal and the mother has the authority to arrest the cop.

they are required to tell the cop they are on probation or parole,,,then they are required to call their probation or parole officer and report the had contact with the police...

and the mother should have been arrested for interfering with the cops while they were dealing with an arrest,,,

 

[Rigby5]

How do you reason with a screeching lunatic like the woman in this video? She simply shouts the officer down over and over again so the woman can not do her job. The kid ran a stop sign, refused to pull over until he got to his house, pulled over on the wrong side of the road. The police officer asked him if he is on parole or probation and the kid's mother answered for him before he could and simply kept demanding the cop give the ticket and leave. The police officer kept trying to explain that the young man has to answer the questions himself. Finally, the officer called for backup. The woman should have been arrested.

Officer's bodycam



Police car dashcam



The whole video is ridiculous. I have been stopped by a police officer for walking on the side of the highway by myself. The cop asked me a few questions and patted me down on the side of the road after I consented. All he did was ask for my ID, asked where I was headed and what I was up to, asked if I was on probation or parole, where I worked, how long I had been at the address on my license, how long I planned on living in the town, if I had ever been in trouble with the law, and how things were going in life. When the other patrol car arrived, that officer took over the interrogation. The original officer then ran my information and when everything came back OK, they let me go with a warning to stay out of trouble. All of that took took not much more than 5 minutes. Things go much smoother and much more quickly if you simply cooperate rather than get defiant and act like a screaming lunatic.

That's nice.
You do realize you are under no legal obligation to answer any questions, right?


(BTW, video links don't work)

You do have a legal obligation to identify yourself.

Only if there are specific articulable facts in evidence that would lead a reasonable person to believe a crime is being, has been, or is about to be committed.
If a cop simply walks up and asks for ID, you are under no legal obligation to provide it.

in this case he was under arrest the minute she pulled him over,,,

Absolutely WRONG!
You are NOT under arrest for a minor traffic violation.
You can only be arrested for a serious and deliberate crime, like DUI, not having a license, hit and run, etc.

 

[Rigby5]

You do HAVE to answer questions relating to the offense you committed or you can be arrested He was required to answer and his mon should have been arrested.

NO!
You most certainly do NOT ever have to answer ANY question related to a possible offense, without your lawyer being pressent.
You do have to show your license, registration, and proof of insurance, and that is all.

And the mom is SUPPOSED to prevent any further questioning.

Again if the cop asks a question and you refuse to answer it CAN in fact be a reason to place that individual under arrest. And yes the mom obstructed by repeatedly drowning out the son and interfering with law enforcement.

ONLY if the person is on parole and signed a consent form to allow such questioning.
Normally such questioning is illegal without a lawyer present.
And it is perfectly LEGAL to interfere with a law enforcement officer who is violating the law by not allowing legal representation to be present.

She was NOT stopping an illegal act you LOON. SHE was obstructing an officer from their appointed duties.

Wrong.
Interrogating a kid without a lawyer is not legal.
A cop can ask questions if the person voluntarily wants to answer, but once told by the mother that the kid did not want to answer, then the cop is required to SHUT UP!
It is illegal to continue to ask questions after being told to stop.
The only except is if the kid is on parole, which is not possible with a juvenile living at home.

 

[progressive hunter]

You do HAVE to answer questions relating to the offense you committed or you can be arrested He was required to answer and his mon should have been arrested.

NO!
You most certainly do NOT ever have to answer ANY question related to a possible offense, without your lawyer being pressent.
You do have to show your license, registration, and proof of insurance, and that is all.

And the mom is SUPPOSED to prevent any further questioning.

Again if the cop asks a question and you refuse to answer it CAN in fact be a reason to place that individual under arrest. And yes the mom obstructed by repeatedly drowning out the son and interfering with law enforcement.

ONLY if the person is on parole and signed a consent form to allow such questioning.
Normally such questioning is illegal without a lawyer present.
And it is perfectly LEGAL to interfere with a law enforcement officer who is violating the law by not allowing legal representation to be present.

WTF???

are you nuts or something???

all she asked is if hes on probation or parole,,and if he is hes required to answer that according to his agreement,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

How do you reason with a screeching lunatic like the woman in this video? She simply shouts the officer down over and over again so the woman can not do her job. The kid ran a stop sign, refused to pull over until he got to his house, pulled over on the wrong side of the road. The police officer asked him if he is on parole or probation and the kid's mother answered for him before he could and simply kept demanding the cop give the ticket and leave. The police officer kept trying to explain that the young man has to answer the questions himself. Finally, the officer called for backup. The woman should have been arrested.

Officer's bodycam



Police car dashcam



The whole video is ridiculous. I have been stopped by a police officer for walking on the side of the highway by myself. The cop asked me a few questions and patted me down on the side of the road after I consented. All he did was ask for my ID, asked where I was headed and what I was up to, asked if I was on probation or parole, where I worked, how long I had been at the address on my license, how long I planned on living in the town, if I had ever been in trouble with the law, and how things were going in life. When the other patrol car arrived, that officer took over the interrogation. The original officer then ran my information and when everything came back OK, they let me go with a warning to stay out of trouble. All of that took took not much more than 5 minutes. Things go much smoother and much more quickly if you simply cooperate rather than get defiant and act like a screaming lunatic.

That's nice.
You do realize you are under no legal obligation to answer any questions, right?


(BTW, video links don't work)

You do have a legal obligation to identify yourself.

Only if there are specific articulable facts in evidence that would lead a reasonable person to believe a crime is being, has been, or is about to be committed.
If a cop simply walks up and asks for ID, you are under no legal obligation to provide it.

in this case he was under arrest the minute she pulled him over,,,

Absolutely WRONG!
You are NOT under arrest for a minor traffic violation.
You can only be arrested for a serious and deliberate crime, like DUI, not having a license, hit and run, etc.

of course youre under arrest,,,
when you receive your ticket it has the charges you are being accused of and the name of the arresting officer and you sign a signature bond,,,

that means you are under arrest,,,

 

[Rigby5]

You do HAVE to answer questions relating to the offense you committed or you can be arrested He was required to answer and his mon should have been arrested.

NO!
You most certainly do NOT ever have to answer ANY question related to a possible offense, without your lawyer being pressent.
You do have to show your license, registration, and proof of insurance, and that is all.

And the mom is SUPPOSED to prevent any further questioning.

if you are on probation or parole you are required to answer any and all questions or you go back to jail,,,

and the mother should have been arrested for interfering with a cop during an arrest,,,

It depends on if the person is on parole, and what kind of questions.
{...
The Rights of the Parolee
When a person progresses through an early release due to parole, he or she has fewer rights than before a conviction. The conditions of the release generally require certain aspects that are in direct conflict with the rights of a United States citizen. These may include searches and seizures of property without a warrant, questioning the person without the need for suspicion of illegal activity and many other issues. The rights are greatly diminished than before prison was a factor for the person. Knowing what rights still exist may depend on the state and the specific circumstances.
...}

However there is no indication this kid was on parole or probation. so then it was correct for the mother to prevent further interrogation.
If the cop tries to continue interrogation through coercion. that is illegal and the mother has the authority to arrest the cop.

they are required to tell the cop they are on probation or parole,,,then they are required to call their probation or parole officer and report the had contact with the police...

and the mother should have been arrested for interfering with the cops while they were dealing with an arrest,,,

The kid was NOT on parole or probation, and the mother had the authority to block all interrogations, so the cop was breaking the law.

Elk Grove Police Department investigates viral video of traffic stop

The Elk Grove Police Department released a statement late Wednesday night saying the agency is investigating an incident between one of its officers and a citizen, captured in a now viral video.

www.kcra.com

 

[Rigby5]

You do HAVE to answer questions relating to the offense you committed or you can be arrested He was required to answer and his mon should have been arrested.

NO!
You most certainly do NOT ever have to answer ANY question related to a possible offense, without your lawyer being pressent.
You do have to show your license, registration, and proof of insurance, and that is all.

And the mom is SUPPOSED to prevent any further questioning.

Again if the cop asks a question and you refuse to answer it CAN in fact be a reason to place that individual under arrest. And yes the mom obstructed by repeatedly drowning out the son and interfering with law enforcement.

ONLY if the person is on parole and signed a consent form to allow such questioning.
Normally such questioning is illegal without a lawyer present.
And it is perfectly LEGAL to interfere with a law enforcement officer who is violating the law by not allowing legal representation to be present.

WTF???

are you nuts or something???

all she asked is if hes on probation or parole,,and if he is hes required to answer that according to his agreement,,,

But since the juvenile was NOT on probation or parole, there was no question that required being answered. In which case the cop was required by law to stop asking any more questions.
But the cop went on for 25 minutes, which is totally illegal.

 

[progressive hunter]

You do HAVE to answer questions relating to the offense you committed or you can be arrested He was required to answer and his mon should have been arrested.

NO!
You most certainly do NOT ever have to answer ANY question related to a possible offense, without your lawyer being pressent.
You do have to show your license, registration, and proof of insurance, and that is all.

And the mom is SUPPOSED to prevent any further questioning.

if you are on probation or parole you are required to answer any and all questions or you go back to jail,,,

and the mother should have been arrested for interfering with a cop during an arrest,,,

It depends on if the person is on parole, and what kind of questions.
{...
The Rights of the Parolee
When a person progresses through an early release due to parole, he or she has fewer rights than before a conviction. The conditions of the release generally require certain aspects that are in direct conflict with the rights of a United States citizen. These may include searches and seizures of property without a warrant, questioning the person without the need for suspicion of illegal activity and many other issues. The rights are greatly diminished than before prison was a factor for the person. Knowing what rights still exist may depend on the state and the specific circumstances.
...}

However there is no indication this kid was on parole or probation. so then it was correct for the mother to prevent further interrogation.
If the cop tries to continue interrogation through coercion. that is illegal and the mother has the authority to arrest the cop.

they are required to tell the cop they are on probation or parole,,,then they are required to call their probation or parole officer and report the had contact with the police...

and the mother should have been arrested for interfering with the cops while they were dealing with an arrest,,,

The kid was NOT on parole or probation, and the mother had the authority to block all interrogations, so the cop was breaking the law.

Elk Grove Police Department investigates viral video of traffic stop

The Elk Grove Police Department released a statement late Wednesday night saying the agency is investigating an incident between one of its officers and a citizen, captured in a now viral video.

www.kcra.com

the cop didnt know that and why she asked the question,,,

the mother could have and should have been arrested for interfering,,,

and I didnt see any interrogation,,,