Top Three "Fact Check" Sites in the Tank for Clinton

[Carl in Michigan]

That made absolutely no sense, Vigilessentials. What is happening is that silly assertions are simply exposed as silly assertions.

Like the claim by some idiot on this board that Christians and Jews are burning alive anyone who won't convert -- just like ISIS

 

[bripat9643]

Trump: the sky is red
Fact-checker: actually, if you look up you'll see that the sky is blue
Alt-right: saying the sky is blue is liberal bias, and makes you a Muslim

Please post an example of such an obvious falsehood Trump committed.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Trump: the sky is red
Fact-checker: actually, if you look up you'll see that the sky is blue
Alt-right: saying the sky is blue is liberal bias, and makes you a Muslim

Please post an example of such an obvious falsehood Trump committed.

Birtherism

Need more?

 

[bripat9643]

Trump: the sky is red
Fact-checker: actually, if you look up you'll see that the sky is blue
Alt-right: saying the sky is blue is liberal bias, and makes you a Muslim

Please post an example of such an obvious falsehood Trump committed.

Birtherism

Need more?

Bad example. There was no hard proof until Obama produced his birth certificate.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Now you know why leftwing douche bags are so big on fact check sites. Just on TV. The top three online "fact check" sites, including Snopes and Politifact, are working for the Clinton campaign. Each has donated as much as one million dollars to Clinton and each fact check function is run by Clinton suck-ups. All the sites have spent most of their time attacking Trump's assertions while avoiding any work to show Clinton's lies. Anyone who's surprised please raise your hand.

​

Why don't you prove that their factchecks are inaccurate.

 

[bripat9643]

Now you know why leftwing douche bags are so big on fact check sites. Just on TV. The top three online "fact check" sites, including Snopes and Politifact, are working for the Clinton campaign. Each has donated as much as one million dollars to Clinton and each fact check function is run by Clinton suck-ups. All the sites have spent most of their time attacking Trump's assertions while avoiding any work to show Clinton's lies. Anyone who's surprised please raise your hand.

​

Why don't you prove that their factchecks are inaccurate.

Been there. Done that.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Trump: the sky is red
Fact-checker: actually, if you look up you'll see that the sky is blue
Alt-right: saying the sky is blue is liberal bias, and makes you a Muslim

Please post an example of such an obvious falsehood Trump committed.

All Mostly False statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact

All False statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact

All Pants on Fire! statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact

Take your pick.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump: the sky is red
Fact-checker: actually, if you look up you'll see that the sky is blue
Alt-right: saying the sky is blue is liberal bias, and makes you a Muslim

Please post an example of such an obvious falsehood Trump committed.

All Mostly False statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact

All False statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact

All Pants on Fire! statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact

Take your pick.

I've already done it, moron.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Trump: the sky is red
Fact-checker: actually, if you look up you'll see that the sky is blue
Alt-right: saying the sky is blue is liberal bias, and makes you a Muslim

Please post an example of such an obvious falsehood Trump committed.

Birtherism

Need more?

Bad example. There was no hard proof until Obama produced his birth certificate.

Plus Hillary's campaign started that... plus Obama himself said he was from Kenya, so he either is or he's lying.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Now you know why leftwing douche bags are so big on fact check sites. Just on TV. The top three online "fact check" sites, including Snopes and Politifact, are working for the Clinton campaign. Each has donated as much as one million dollars to Clinton and each fact check function is run by Clinton suck-ups. All the sites have spent most of their time attacking Trump's assertions while avoiding any work to show Clinton's lies. Anyone who's surprised please raise your hand.

​

Why don't you prove that their factchecks are inaccurate.

Been there. Done that.

You lie.

Here:

go ahead and prove every one of these wrong.

All Pants on Fire! statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact

 

[Vigilante]

Now the alt right is saying that their assertions that the factual checking by the fact-check sites are unfactual.

What you are saying is that "the rest of America is as stupid as us," and you are, fact check, in for a big surprise.

JakeAss's new avatar.... fit perfectly!

 

[AntonToo]

Been there. Done that.

Like the time you proved Snopes was wrong and Machado actually did porn....by digging up a pic of not-Machado porn star?

Is that the kind of DOING we are talking about?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Anyone who dismisses the fact that politifact is biased beyond belief is a complete tool.

Prove the bias.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I don't remember too many RW'ers calling Politifact bogus when they gave Obama lie of the year.

 

[AntonToo]

I don't remember too many RW'ers calling Politifact bogus when they gave Obama lie of the year.

Reality has insidious liberal bias and that's always been a tough pill to swallow for the right, but in this election especially their coping mechanism of choice has been denial.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Trump: the sky is red
Fact-checker: actually, if you look up you'll see that the sky is blue
Alt-right: saying the sky is blue is liberal bias, and makes you a Muslim

Please post an example of such an obvious falsehood Trump committed.

Birtherism

Need more?

Bad example. There was no hard proof until Obama produced his birth certificate.

Nah it's a pretty good example. Trump kept lying his fat ass off well after Obama produced his birth certificate.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The alt right struggle in their web of lies.

The links posted above show scientific no-junk facts and that the OP is a lie.

 

[candycorn]

When you check something on Snopes, it always claims unproven or false. When they claim something is false, it's never backed up. Unproven means there is no video. Witnesses are dismissed if they say something bad about Clinton while her supporters are taken at their word. Asking someone in the Clinton camp about something is all they need to declare the rumor false.

I posted something in this forum a while back. I was checking a story about Hillary on Snopes and they claimed it was false. At the bottom of the page, there was a disclaimer by Snopes which stated that the person doing the fact checking was hired by Snopes by order of Obama. That was Snopes actually putting that on the page.

Yesterday you posted a thread that said they found a warehouse that had ballots marked for Clinton.

“Tens of thousands” of fraudulent Clinton votes found in Ohio warehouse

One of the pictures in it was supposedly the guy who found them and the boxes….

Prince, shown here, poses with his find, as election officials investigate.


Remember that?


The trouble is that the picture and the guy who supposedly found them (pictured above), as Snopes pointed out, wasn’t in Ohio. he wasn’t even in this nation.

He works for the election authorities in jolly old England:

You can see the full breadth of your lie at this link:

Election 2015 polling day: Birmingham takes to the polling stations

Snipes blew your extra jumbo, incredibly lonely ass out of the water as they aways do. Either stop lying or learn to do it better.

Now, quickly bitch….say something about HRC to try to justify your lies.

 

[candycorn]

Another unfactual bold assertion without evidence.

An argument is not mutually exclusive with provisions of evidence. Neither is conjecture mutually exclusive with a lack of evidence.

Anaylze the explanations for their truth-o-meter. Lies associated with Trump are way more likely to include character attacks than lies associated with Hillary Clinton. That is not conjecture, but rather a verifiable fact that you can observe yourself on their site.

You expanded a singular observation into a general conclusion.

No he did not... but this is something the leftist regressives love to do. One white man did something bad => everyone must pay reparations.

A few muslims have committed heinous crimes (relative to the number on earth and in this nation); your messiah wants to ban them all because of the actions of the few.

 

[candycorn]

Trump: the sky is red
Fact-checker: actually, if you look up you'll see that the sky is blue
Alt-right: saying the sky is blue is liberal bias, and makes you a Muslim

Please post an example of such an obvious falsehood Trump committed.

I know more about ISIS than the Generals.