Top Three "Fact Check" Sites in the Tank for Clinton

[bripat9643]

Now you know why leftwing douche bags are so big on fact check sites. Just on TV. The top three online "fact check" sites, including Snopes and Politifact, are working for the Clinton campaign. Each has donated as much as one million dollars to Clinton and each fact check function is run by Clinton suck-ups. All the sites have spent most of their time attacking Trump's assertions while avoiding any work to show Clinton's lies. Anyone who's surprised please raise your hand.

​

 

[Clementine]

When you check something on Snopes, it always claims unproven or false. When they claim something is false, it's never backed up. Unproven means there is no video. Witnesses are dismissed if they say something bad about Clinton while her supporters are taken at their word. Asking someone in the Clinton camp about something is all they need to declare the rumor false.

I posted something in this forum a while back. I was checking a story about Hillary on Snopes and they claimed it was false. At the bottom of the page, there was a disclaimer by Snopes which stated that the person doing the fact checking was hired by Snopes by order of Obama. That was Snopes actually putting that on the page.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Now the alt right is saying that their assertions that the factual checking by the fact-check sites are unfactual.

What you are saying is that "the rest of America is as stupid as us," and you are, fact check, in for a big surprise.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Now you know why leftwing douche bags are so big on fact check sites. Just on TV. The top three online "fact check" sites, including Snopes and Politifact, are working for the Clinton campaign. Each has donated as much as one million dollars to Clinton and each fact check function is run by Clinton suck-ups. All the sites have spent most of their time attacking Trump's assertions while avoiding any work to show Clinton's lies. Anyone who's surprised please raise your hand.

​

Both Snopes and Politifact are a joke. When the left sources them just snicker

 

[Norman]

Anyone who dismisses the fact that politifact is biased beyond belief is a complete tool.

 

[JakeStarkey]

sassy and norman are lost in the world of belief that that is alt right.

 

[Onyx]

Anyone who dismisses the fact that politifact is biased beyond belief is a complete tool.

It is difficult to pick up on what is biased and what is not. Frankly people just like to cry bias whenever they are not being advantaged.

Anyways, politifact is biased. They give obvious hints of bias in the explanations for their truth-o-meter.

 

[rdean]

Facts have had a liberal bias for decades. It's why they are called "facts".

Here are some Republican "facts":

Obama was born in Kenya

The earth is a few thousand years old

God put bones in the ground so we can see what animals on other worlds look like

Hillary kills people

Trump has good policies, but they are secret

Mexico will pay for the wall

Trump U made thousands rich

Trump foundation helps millions of people

Trump never thinks about banging his daughter

These are the "facts" that make Republicans want to vote Trump.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Anyone who dismisses the fact that politifact is biased beyond belief is a complete tool.

It is difficult to pick up on what is biased and what is not. Frankly people just like to cry bias whenever they are not being advantaged.

Anyways, politifact is biased. They give obvious hints of bias in the explanations for their truth-o-meter.

Another unfactual bold assertion without evidence.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Facts have had a liberal bias for decades. It's why they are called "facts".

Here are some Republican "facts":

Obama was born in Kenya

The earth is a few thousand years old

God put bones in the ground so we can see what animals on other worlds look like

Hillary kills people

Trump has good policies, but they are secret

Mexico will pay for the wall

Trump U made thousands rich

Trump foundation helps millions of people

Trump never thinks about banging his daughter

Gawd you're an idiot

 

[Norman]

Facts have had a liberal bias for decades. It's why they are called "facts".

Here are some Republican "facts":

Obama was born in Kenya

The earth is a few thousand years old

God put bones in the ground so we can see what animals on other worlds look like

Hillary kills people

Trump has good policies, but they are secret

Mexico will pay for the wall

Trump U made thousands rich

Trump foundation helps millions of people

Trump never thinks about banging his daughter

These are the "facts" that make Republicans want to vote Trump.

Facts have liberal bias... which is why they are trying to ban them referring to them as "hate facts".

 

[ogibillm]

When you check something on Snopes, it always claims unproven or false. When they claim something is false, it's never backed up. Unproven means there is no video. Witnesses are dismissed if they say something bad about Clinton while her supporters are taken at their word. Asking someone in the Clinton camp about something is all they need to declare the rumor false.

I posted something in this forum a while back. I was checking a story about Hillary on Snopes and they claimed it was false. At the bottom of the page, there was a disclaimer by Snopes which stated that the person doing the fact checking was hired by Snopes by order of Obama. That was Snopes actually putting that on the page.

welp... you're a liar

 

[JakeStarkey]

Facts have had a liberal bias for decades. It's why they are called "facts".

Here are some Republican "facts":

Obama was born in Kenya

The earth is a few thousand years old

God put bones in the ground so we can see what animals on other worlds look like

Hillary kills people

Trump has good policies, but they are secret

Mexico will pay for the wall

Trump U made thousands rich

Trump foundation helps millions of people

Trump never thinks about banging his daughter

These are the "facts" that make Republicans want to vote Trump.

Facts have liberal bias... which is why they are trying to ban them referring to them as "hate facts".

That made absolutely no sense, Vigilessentials. What is happening is that silly assertions are simply exposed as silly assertions.

 

[Onyx]

Another unfactual bold assertion without evidence.

An argument is not mutually exclusive with provisions of evidence. Neither is conjecture mutually exclusive with a lack of evidence.

Anaylze the explanations for their truth-o-meter. Lies associated with Trump are way more likely to include character attacks than lies associated with Hillary Clinton. That is not conjecture, but rather a verifiable fact that you can observe yourself on their site.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Another unfactual bold assertion without evidence.

An argument is not mutually exclusive with provisions of evidence. Neither is conjecture mutually exclusive with a lack of evidence.

Anaylze the explanations for their truth-o-meter. Lies associated with Trump are way more likely to include character attacks than lies associated with Hillary Clinton. That is not conjecture, but rather a verifiable fact that you can observe yourself on their site.

You expanded a singular observation into a general conclusion.

 

[Norman]

Another unfactual bold assertion without evidence.

An argument is not mutually exclusive with provisions of evidence. Neither is conjecture mutually exclusive with a lack of evidence.

Anaylze the explanations for their truth-o-meter. Lies associated with Trump are way more likely to include character attacks than lies associated with Hillary Clinton. That is not conjecture, but rather a verifiable fact that you can observe yourself on their site.

You expanded a singular observation into a general conclusion.

No he did not... but this is something the leftist regressives love to do. One white man did something bad => everyone must pay reparations.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Another unfactual bold assertion without evidence.

An argument is not mutually exclusive with provisions of evidence. Neither is conjecture mutually exclusive with a lack of evidence.

Anaylze the explanations for their truth-o-meter. Lies associated with Trump are way more likely to include character attacks than lies associated with Hillary Clinton. That is not conjecture, but rather a verifiable fact that you can observe yourself on their site.

You expanded a singular observation into a general conclusion.

No he did not... but this is something the leftist regressives love to do. One white man did something bad => everyone must pay reparations.

Yep, he did. You need to learn what is a hasty generalization fallacy. Go take a logic course. You desperately need it.

 

[Norman]

Another unfactual bold assertion without evidence.

An argument is not mutually exclusive with provisions of evidence. Neither is conjecture mutually exclusive with a lack of evidence.

Anaylze the explanations for their truth-o-meter. Lies associated with Trump are way more likely to include character attacks than lies associated with Hillary Clinton. That is not conjecture, but rather a verifiable fact that you can observe yourself on their site.

You expanded a singular observation into a general conclusion.

No he did not... but this is something the leftist regressives love to do. One white man did something bad => everyone must pay reparations.

Yep, he did. You need to learn what is a hasty generalization fallacy. Go take a logic course. You desperately need it.

I have taken more logic and statistics courses than can be counted with your math skills, you are full of shit.

 

[bripat9643]

Now the alt right is saying that their assertions that the factual checking by the fact-check sites are unfactual.

What you are saying is that "the rest of America is as stupid as us," and you are, fact check, in for a big surprise.

Everyone who isn't a complete moron has been saying that for years, dumbass.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Trump: the sky is red
Fact-checker: actually, if you look up you'll see that the sky is blue
Alt-right: saying the sky is blue is liberal bias, and makes you a Muslim