Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
As though he received a Nobel Prize for climate work, instead of work with light particles.
You don't challenge my statement. Clauser is by NO means a climate scientist and he's 82 years old. However, I DARE you to find a single shred of evidence that John Clauser believes CO2 does not support the greenhouse effect. that he agrees with YOU about ANYTHING. I fucking DARE you.LOL!!!
Only science INVALIDS fall for the Co2 FRAUD.
Just as only religious MORONS believe Israel is our ally...
=2Clauser is by NO means a climate scientist and he's 82 years old.
No response. What a fooking surprise.You don't challenge my statement. Clauser is by NO means a climate scientist and he's 82 years old. However, I DARE you to find a single shred of evidence that John Clauser believes CO2 does not support the greenhouse effect. that he agrees with YOU about ANYTHING. I fucking DARE you.
You don't challenge my statement. Clauser is by NO means a climate scientist and he's 82 years old. However, I DARE you to find a single shred of evidence that John Clauser believes CO2 does not support the greenhouse effect. that he agrees with YOU about ANYTHING. I fucking DARE you.
Don't spend 24/7 here. Have other things in life....
Things other than defending your claims.Don't spend 24/7 here. Have other things in life....
Clauser knows next to nothing about the climate. It isn't his field. He has not published a single article or been involved in any form of study involving the climate.There you go again with the term "climate scientist," which means
a left wing taxpayer funded person who fudges data and lies to bilk the taxpayer.
You are correct. Data shows that CO2 increases lags increases in temperature. At some times the CO2 levels have been higher and the temperature lower. At other times the CO2 levels have been lower and the temperature higher.Anyone who understands basic science and has an IQ over 10 understands the Co2 FRAUD is FRAUD....
Hey Clauser, come here to understand what does cause climate change since we both know Co2 does NOTHING....
*immediately posts media coverageAnyone who understands basic science and has an IQ over 10 understands the Co2 FRAUD is FRAUD....
Hey Clauser, come here to understand what does cause climate change since we both know Co2 does NOTHING....
These guys don't understand how science works. They think whoever acts the most childish or gets the most attention is right.Clauser knows next to nothing about the climate. It isn't his field. He has not published a single article or been involved in any form of study involving the climate.
That's a real seasoned analysis you've done there. A real analysis shows a correlation coefficient of 0.842. ( On the causal structure between CO2 and global temperature - Scientific Reports.)You are correct. Data shows that CO2 increases lags increases in temperature. At some times the CO2 levels have been higher and the temperature lower. At other times the CO2 levels have been lower and the temperature higher.
You are as dumb as a fucking rock.This silly ass idea that man made CO2 emission is causing climate change is nothing more than a scam.
That's idiot. CO2 correlates to emissions. Temperature does not correlate to CO2. Natural climate fluctuations aren't being accounted for in their correlation because their models aren't accurate enough to distinguish between the two.That's a real seasoned analysis you've done there. A real analysis shows a correlation coefficient of 0.842. ( On the causal structure between CO2 and global temperature - Scientific Reports.)
You are as dumb as a fucking rock.
The limited extent of 'greenhouse' effect is very small since the CO2 amount is also very small. CO2 at one part in 2,500 is not a factor in climate change cycles as seen over millennia to eons.You don't challenge my statement. Clauser is by NO means a climate scientist and he's 82 years old. However, I DARE you to find a single shred of evidence that John Clauser believes CO2 does not support the greenhouse effect. that he agrees with YOU about ANYTHING. I fucking DARE you.
The correlation between CO2 and temperature is calculated as 0.842.The limited extent of 'greenhouse' effect is very small since the CO2 amount is also very small. CO2 at one part in 2,500 is not a factor in climate change cycles as seen over millennia to eons.
www.nature.com
Clauser knows next to nothing about the climate. It isn't his field. He has not published a single article or been involved in any form of study involving the climate.
