Tom Homan spills the beans.

This liberal whinefest is hilarious. The only thing that would appease these loons would be the lawlessness of ignoring our immigration laws.
Does it surprise me to see you being in favor of trump admin lawlessness and corruption in pursuit of a policy goal? No.
 
This liberal whinefest is hilarious. The only thing that would appease these loons would be the lawlessness of ignoring our immigration laws. As they did for four years of Biden all the while robbing the people blind by redirecting tax dollars to pay for their illegal alien pets.

Best to ignore them while they wallow in their impotent rage.

Get back to us when you have some FAQs. Both Biden and Obama deported thousands more than Trump did in his first term.

Trump simply locked everyone up in prison camps at $700 a day per prisoner to help out his buddies in the for profit prison industry.

Biden closed all of the for-profit prisons and passed a law making them illegal because of the abuses involved. You could put people up in luxury of a four-star hotel for less than $700 a day.

ICE has already run out of money and prison space which is why they now want to use Guantánamo Bay. So despite all of their promises that there would be no “catch and release”, border patrol is now doing catch and release.

The people ICE are now arresting, are being given ankle monitors, and released.

And last, but not least, Trump has deported fewer people than Biden, dead by the same time in his administration.
 
If there was actual injustice involved in Adams' prosecution trump could have pardoned him. But the goal was to wield a cudgel against Eric knowing if he didn't step and fetch it to Don's satisfaction Adams would be facing charges again. The entire episode not only being illegal but insidious.
If the alleged corruption existed, how does some or all of it not coincide with NY state laws? Yet NY state and NYPD mysterious missed everything right under their noses. Instead of a criminal investigation by the state they are seeking to possibly remove a duly elected mayor through shady undemocratic means. You loons are hilarious.
 
Is that a joke? "Cooperative criminals" may help the prosecution enforce the law in return for leniency. In this case Adams is providing a rationale for not enforcing the law in return for policy sycophancy.
Its the same thing

Dirtbag A agrees to testify against the Mafia, and in return he doesnt go to jail
 
Does it surprise me to see you being in favor of trump admin lawlessness and corruption in pursuit of a policy goal? No.
So take away Trump's leverage. Certainly the alleged crimes Adams is accused of violate NY laws. Why then do you loons chase shady undemocratic means to remove him from office? Whining like little bitches while alternative lawful methods exists is utterly pathetic.
 
If the alleged corruption existed, how does some or all of it not coincide with NY state laws? Yet NY state and NYPD mysterious missed everything right under their noses. Instead of a criminal investigation by the state they are seeking to possibly remove a duly elected mayor through shady undemocratic means. You loons are hilarious.

I've wondered the same thing. OK federal laws were dropped. I can't imagine there aren't state laws to go after.

That's what NY did with Trump.
 
Not a comment that addresses the issue of the DoJ entering in to an illegal quid pro quo agreement with Adams, objected to by numerous members of the DoJ, exposing Bove and Bondi as overtly corrupting influences on the DoJ.............all to please the boss.
After democrat's hit job on Adams for making Biden and the dems look bad on immigration? Cry me a river. Bottom line, the more sanctuary places that go the better. They are breaking federal laws.
 
If the alleged corruption existed, how does some or all of it not coincide with NY state laws? Yet NY state and NYPD mysterious missed everything right under their noses. Instead of a criminal investigation by the state they are seeking to possibly remove a duly elected mayor through shady undemocratic means. You loons are hilarious.
If by "they" you are referring to NY state officials, they were relying on Adams' prosecution going ahead as scheduled. Were they supposed to anticipate this level of corruption from trump's DoJ? Actually, they probably should have.
 
Why is there so much support for the invasion?
There is no invasion. Why is there such a lack of concern about the illegal dealings the trump DoJ is engaged in? Then again you must be accustomed to illegality from trump by now.
 
If by "they" you are referring to NY state officials, they were relying on Adams' prosecution going ahead as scheduled. Were they supposed to anticipate this level of corruption from trump's DoJ? Actually, they probably should have.
So NY was ignoring Adams alleged criminality in the hopes someone else would take care of it? Wow. Talk about lawlessness.
 
trump has been down this road before.

The issue arose in 2020 during Mr. Trump’s first term, in the prosecution of Michael T. Flynn, his national security adviser. That year, Mr. Flynn, who had pleaded guilty to lying to the F.B.I., sought to withdraw his plea, and federal prosecutors in Washington moved to dismiss the indictment against him. When the judge overseeing the case, Emmet G. Sullivan, did not immediately grant the dismissal, Mr. Flynn took his argument to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

In a June 2020 decision, a three-judge panel of that court noted that “decisions to dismiss pending criminal charges” were squarely within a prosecutor’s purview and that circumstances in which a judge could intervene were limited. Their ruling was overturned, but the precedent that informed it stands.

In a more recent case, federal prosecutors in Washington last month moved to dismiss an indictment against two men associated with the Proud Boys. They received clemency from Mr. Trump after pleading guilty in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

The judge, Beryl A. Howell, wrote a scathing opinion criticizing the government’s rationale for asking to drop the charges — that Mr. Trump’s pardons and commutations for Jan. 6 offenses had ended “a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people.”


Well, everything about trump is a grave national injustice including never having to defend himself in court over his two federal criminal indictments.
 
There is no invasion. Why is there such a lack of concern about the illegal dealings the trump DoJ is engaged in? Then again you must be accustomed to illegality from trump by now.
You must welcome the rapes, murders and crimes by those here illegally. Do you think this is some sort of attack on white supremacy. You do support the democrats paying Tren de Aragua to take over apartment building, right? Sorry, but saying Trump is not a magic word that makes an invading force of criminals disappear.
 
Its the same thing

Dirtbag A agrees to testify against the Mafia, and in return he doesnt go to jail
It's nothing like the same thing. Quid pro quo arrangements are illegal.
 
Last edited:
Is this the first time that a defendant has been offered leniency in exchange for cooperating with law enforcement?
 
You must welcome the rapes, murders and crimes by those here illegally. Do you think this is some sort of attack on white supremacy. You do support the democrats paying Tren de Aragua to take over apartment building, right? Sorry, but saying Trump is not a magic word that makes an invading force of criminals disappear.
I had to look up Tren de Aragua as I am not as familiar with right wing media mythology as you are.

 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom