To all those Saying it's ok for the feds to mandate a vaccine

[buckeye45_73]

Hahaha, as if you can catch that from the breath of the guy next to you.

he could get a paper cut and put the whole office in danger....safety first!

 

[buckeye45_73]

No they can't, unless you're banning them from prostitution. People with AIDS can't spread the disease at work, unless they're sharing bodily fluids with co-workers or customers.

yeah, they could cut themselves......I mean what about pro sports? Should they be allowed to play football?

 

[TNHarley]

Where have the courts limited OSHA's workplace safety requirements?

OSH Act of 1970 | Occupational Safety and Health Administration

www.osha.gov

That isnt the right question. The right question would be, "where does the constitution give the fed gov the authority to do that?"

 

[bendog]

Well, I'm not in favor of osha mandating either vaccinations or employee self funding testing, or requiring employers to pay for testing.

But it's simply untrue to say there's any national mandate.

Rather, I think it should be more up to public opinion and employees and employers being responsible.

 

[bendog]

That isnt the right question. The right question would be, "where does the constitution give the fed gov the authority to do that?"

oh please, at least try to stay on topic rather than going down a selective re-reading of osha's constitutionality. It's been done.

 

[TNHarley]

oh please, at least try to stay on topic rather than going down a selective re-reading of osha's constitutionality. It's been done.

The fed govs authority over vaccine mandates in a thread about the fed govs authority over vaccine mandates is off topic?

 

[TNHarley]

The fed govs authority over vaccine mandates in a thread about the fed govs authority over vaccine mandates is off topic?

I wasnt even speaking of osha. Thats why i said that wasnt the right the question and brought up what the constitution says. But bite my head off and not boos. Its the cultists way

 

[BlindBoo]

That isnt the right question. The right question would be, "where does the constitution give the fed gov the authority to do that?"

Shut up and put that seat belt on!

</sarcasm>

 

[bendog]

The fed govs authority over vaccine mandates in a thread about the fed govs authority over vaccine mandates is off topic?

No you're rabbit hole of osha constitutionality is OT. But imo there's a question of whether mandating testing, or placing a burden on employees to get tested, is consistent with what OSHA. Could the govt make requirements on how much sleep employees have, or how much booze they drink the night before? I don't think so.

 

[BlindBoo]

he could get a paper cut and put the whole office in danger....safety first!

Mandate band aids.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Mandate band aids.

What if it requires stiches?
Or what if the Boss is banging an intern......I know this has never happened....but it could

 

[BlindBoo]

What if it requires stiches?
Or what if the Boss is banging an intern......I know this has never happened....but it could

I can barely see you way out there in right field......

 

[TNHarley]

Shut up and put that seat belt on!

</sarcasm>

Seatbelt laws are state laws, dumbass. And them requiring seatbelts to be built is not found in the constitution either.
But keep throwing out faulty comparisons because them abusing power means nothing to you. I dont give 2 shits

 

[TNHarley]

No you're rabbit hole of osha constitutionality is OT. But imo there's a question of whether mandating testing, or placing a burden on employees to get tested, is consistent with what OSHA. Could the govt make requirements on how much sleep employees have, or how much booze they drink the night before? I don't think so.

So, him bringing up federal power over osha isnt? But me asking him to look up federal powers in the constitution is. Even though federal powers is WHAT THIS THREAD IS ABOUT.
And the kicker is you thanked a post about him derailing the thread with a faulty comparison about seatbelts.
You make no sense, you drunk dumbfuck.

 

[TNHarley]

What if it requires stiches?
Or what if the Boss is banging an intern......I know this has never happened....but it could

Federal supremacists are not consistent. They cant be. If they were, they wouldnt be federal supremacists.

 

[HenryBHough]

Fella in Germany has an inventory of over 100,000,000 bright yellow cloth stars he's been sitting on for over 50 years. Now he's seeing a light at the end of the tunnel as mandates become increasingly popular.

 

[BlindBoo]

Seatbelt laws are state laws, dumbass. And them requiring seatbelts to be built is not found in the constitution either.
But keep throwing out faulty comparisons because them abusing power means nothing to you. I dont give 2 shits

Same shit, but different.

When David Hollister introduced a seat belt bill in Michigan in the early 1980s that levied a fine for not buckling up, the state representative received hate mail comparing him to Hitler. At the time, only 14 percent of Americans regularly wore seat belts, even though the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) required lap and shoulder belts in all new cars starting in 1968.

Resistance to the life-saving devices at the time was the norm.

Drivers and passengers complained that seat belts were uncomfortable and restrictive, but the uproar over mandatory seat belt laws was mostly ideological. One of Hollister’s colleagues in the Michigan House called the seat belt bill “a pretty good lesson in mass hysteria created by a corporate-controlled media” and warned that the government would outlaw smoking next. Another said that anyone who voted for the bill should be recalled

When New Seat Belt Laws Drew Fire as a Violation of Personal Freedom | HISTORY

The 1980s battle over safety belt laws reflected widespread ambivalence over the role and value of government regulation.

www.history.com

 

[TNHarley]

Same shit, but different.

When David Hollister introduced a seat belt bill in Michigan in the early 1980s that levied a fine for not buckling up, the state representative received hate mail comparing him to Hitler. At the time, only 14 percent of Americans regularly wore seat belts, even though the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) required lap and shoulder belts in all new cars starting in 1968.

Resistance to the life-saving devices at the time was the norm.

Drivers and passengers complained that seat belts were uncomfortable and restrictive, but the uproar over mandatory seat belt laws was mostly ideological. One of Hollister’s colleagues in the Michigan House called the seat belt bill “a pretty good lesson in mass hysteria created by a corporate-controlled media” and warned that the government would outlaw smoking next. Another said that anyone who voted for the bill should be recalled

When New Seat Belt Laws Drew Fire as a Violation of Personal Freedom | HISTORY

The 1980s battle over safety belt laws reflected widespread ambivalence over the role and value of government regulation.

www.history.com

Honestly, I dont give 2 shits. Seat belt laws are STATE laws.
If you want to converse, fine. But at least say something relevant.

 

[JimH52]

You want kids to die?

State-by-State: Vaccinations Required for Public School Kindergarten - ProCon.org

Find out which vaccines are mandated for public school kindergarten entry as of August 2021, along with links for each state's requirements.

vaccines.procon.org

 

[JimH52]

MSN

www.msn.com

Red states are suffering needless deaths because of misinformation and ignorance.