Those of you against destruction of the drug-hauling boats... question...

[berg80]

That's only your biased opinion.

Sorry if you folks can't meme worth shit.

For the most part memes are childish over simplifications. No wonder you employ them.

 

[mudwhistle]

The point is obvious to most intelligent people. And obviously you aren't one as you don't seem to
see there is no distinction. A missile containing nuclear bombs is no different than a missile carrying poisonous toxins that can kill people. So why are democrats against the destruction of boat/missiles carrying drugs that can kill Americans? They both kill Americans... but those of you against destruction of the boats or missiles obviously hate Americans! So why are you living here?

Well......according to these dipshit.....only boats heading toward the US can be sunk.
Boats heading elsewhere should be allowed to go deliver their horrific cargo without being molested.
Somebody needs to tell me how we can tell where those boats are going to Europe from those videos?

 

[mudwhistle]

Having a bad reputation in trumpworld most often means the reporting is spot on. The more accurate the report the louder Dotard screams "fake news."

Yeah....and you dipshits told everyone that Russian Collusion was real, Biden was sharp as a tack, and that Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian misinformation. Also you claim that men can be women and have babies.

The irony is palatable.

After the constant string of leftist hoaxes issued from the media, I don't think you can claim that we're the fakes. And you cannot get away with questioning our skepticism in anything you try to push in political debates.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Nope,.....only the drug boats coming from Venezuela. You're trying to insert fake scenarios into the discussion to pose some illegitimate "What If" that doesn't exist.

They do for Venezuela.
Why is that?

You leftist idiots would argue till your face turns blue for anything your masters want.

We've spelled out in detail the fact that Obama, Biden, and Clinton all used their authority (granted by congress years ago) to do exactly what you libs claim Trump is doing illegally.

You're FOS.
WHERE is Trump's authorization, for attacks on countries that haven't attacked..........ANYTHING?

Only now is this an issue simply because Democrats and their corrupt media made it into an issue.

Just like the constitution, that pesky Geneva convention gets in the way of Trump and his regimes, crimes.

 

[mudwhistle]

They do for Venezuela.
Why is that?

You're FOS.
WHERE is Trump's authorization, for attacks on countries that haven't attacked..........ANYTHING?

Just like the constitution, that pesky Geneva convention gets in the way of Trump and his regimes, crimes.

The Geneva Convention counts only during wartime.

It doesn't apply to acts of terrorism in one form or another.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[Mac1958]

So, when do we start bombing the boats coming out of the ports of The Bahamas, Belize, Bolivia, Burma, the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Panama and Peru?

For the most part memes are childish over simplifications. No wonder you employ them.

It appears the rubes actually think this mess is about drug running. From Venezuela.

I hope we can be a serious country again one day. This is so damn embarrassing.

 

[berg80]

So why are democrats against the destruction of boat/missiles carrying drugs that can kill Americans?

The law doesn't permit the extra judicial killing of human beings in boats allegedly transporting drugs to the US. It's not complicated for most intelligent people.

 

[Hafar1014]

There was a second larger boat in the area. That was the boat for the transfer of drugs. After the first hit all of the drugs were not destroyed. The larger boat was not on the identified hit list so couldnt be fired on. To prevent them from getting the drugs still intact the order to fire again was given. Makes sense to me.

All this democrat talk about innocent survivors shows how morally corrupt they are. They have empathy for killers but none for American victims

 

[berg80]

Yeah....and you dipshits told everyone that Russian Collusion was real

And you folks believed the Mueller Report exonerated trump.

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter

www.lawfaremedia.org

Report of the Select Committee on Intelligence United States Senate on Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election | Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

www.intelligence.senate.gov

New Reports on Russian Interference Don’t Show What Trump Says They Do​

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/25/us/trump-obama-russia.html?campaign_id=2&emc=edit_th_20250726&instance_id=159281&nl=today%27s-headlines&regi_id=65145149&segment_id=202641&user_id=fecdfdffdaaa11107b72f0f4f6e429cc

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

The Geneva Convention counts only during wartime.

HOLY ****.
No, it doesn't, you claimed to be in the military?
I guess they need ditch diggers too.

It doesn't apply to acts of terrorism in one form or another.

Just like Kegseth, another ditch digger.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

It appears the rubes actually think this mess is about drug running. From Venezuela.

And ONLY Venezuela's boats are getting bombed.
How convenient they have large oil reserves.

I hope we can be a serious country again one day. This is so damn embarrassing.

Embarrassing is MTG, the nut case is now a voice of reason?

 

[mudwhistle]

HOLY ****.
No, it doesn't, you claimed to be in the military?
I guess they need ditch diggers too.

Just like Kegseth, another ditch digger.

Guess you need to read up on it then.

The Geneva Convention was an agreement between nations to insure proper treatment of enemy combatants.
Acts of terrorism aren't covered.
However, you seem to have no problem with rape, torture and murder of Israeli prisoners by Hamas.

 

[Nostra]

At least the wrap their fish up nice and neat in 2.2 lb bundles.

 

[berg80]

Acts of terrorism aren't covered.

Where in US law is the prez given unilateral authority to designate individuals or groups of individuals as terrorists for the purpose of justifying their assassination by the US military?

 

[Nostra]

The Geneva Convention counts only during wartime.

It doesn't apply to acts of terrorism in one form or another.

Fancy Nutball has no connection to reality.

 

[mudwhistle]

Where in US law is the prez given unilateral authority to designate individuals or groups of individuals as terrorists for the purpose of justifying their assassination by the US military?

Designating Cartels And Other Organizations As Foreign Terrorist Organizations And Specially Designated Global Terrorists

DESIGNATING CARTELS AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AS FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS AND SPECIALLY DESIGNATED GLOBAL TERRORISTS By the authority vested in me as

www.whitehouse.gov

DESIGNATING CARTELS AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AS FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS AND SPECIALLY DESIGNATED GLOBAL TERRORISTS


By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA),50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq. it is hereby ordered:


Section 1. Purpose. This order creates a process by which certain international cartels (the Cartels) and other organizations will be designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations, consistent with section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), or Specially Designated Global Terrorists, consistent with IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702) and Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001 (Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism), as amended.


(a) International cartels constitute a national-security threat beyond that posed by traditional organized crime, with activities encompassing:


(i) convergence between themselves and a range of extra-hemispheric actors, from designated foreign-terror organizations to antagonistic foreign governments;


(ii) complex adaptive systems, characteristic of entities engaged in insurgency and asymmetric warfare; and


(iii) infiltration into foreign governments across the Western Hemisphere.


The Cartels have engaged in a campaign of violence and terror throughout the Western Hemisphere that has not only destabilized countries with significant importance for our national interests but also flooded the United States with deadly drugs, violent criminals, and vicious gangs.


The Cartels functionally control, through a campaign of assassination, terror, rape, and brute force nearly all illegal traffic across the southern border of the United States. In certain portions of Mexico, they function as quasi-governmental entities, controlling nearly all aspects of society. The Cartels’ activities threaten the safety of the American people, the security of the United States, and the stability of the international order in the Western Hemisphere. Their activities, proximity to, and incursions into the physical territory of the United States pose an unacceptable national security risk to the United States.


(b) Other transnational organizations, such as Tren de Aragua (TdA) and La Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) pose similar threats to the United States. Their campaigns of violence and terror in the United States and internationally are extraordinarily violent, vicious, and similarly threaten the stability of the international order in the Western Hemisphere.


(c) The Cartels and other transnational organizations, such as TdA and MS-13, operate both within and outside the United States. They present an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. I hereby declare a national emergency, under IEEPA, to deal with those threats.


Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to ensure the total elimination of these organizations’ presence in the United States and their ability to threaten the territory, safety, and security of the United States through their extraterritorial command-and-control structures, thereby protecting the American people and the territorial integrity of the United States.


Sec. 3. Implementation. (a) Within 14 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of State shall take all appropriate action, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence, to make a recommendation regarding the designation of any cartel or other organization described in section 1 of this order as a Foreign Terrorist Organization consistent with 8 U.S.C. 1189 and/or a Specially Designated Global Terrorist consistent with 50 U.S.C. 1702 and Executive Order 13224.


(b) Within 14 days of the date of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall take all appropriate action, in consultation with the Secretary of State, to make operational preparations regarding the implementation of any decision I make to invoke the Alien Enemies Act, 50 U.S.C. 21 et seq., in relation to the existence of any qualifying invasion or predatory incursion against the territory of the United States by a qualifying actor, and to prepare such facilities as necessary to expedite the removal of those who may be designated under this order.

 

[Lesh]

Let's say several missiles were launched against the USA that contained drugs that could kill millions of Americans.
Would you still be against shooting down the missiles?

Who launched em?

 

[healthmyths]

The law doesn't permit the extra judicial killing of human beings in boats allegedly transporting drugs to the US. It's not complicated for most intelligent people.

What "LAW"????? What "extra judicial killing"????
"An extrajudicial killing (EJK) is the deliberate killing of a person by state actors or others without legal authority or judicial process, violating human rights, often targeting political opponents, activists, or minorities, and bypassing lawful trials, essentially a "hit" by government or vigilante groups, not a legitimate act of self-defense or war."
Unlike you I use the internet and asked this simple question, which you could do!

"Can an unmarked boat considered a danger to society be destroyed"?
NOW here is the LAW that the boats that have NO flags, no nationalization identification are liable FOR!

Yes, an unmarked vessel that is officially deemed a severe and imminent danger to navigation, human health, or the environment can be removed or even destroyed by authorized government entities under specific legal authorities.

Legal Authorities, and How the Program Works | Department of Natural Resources

dnr.wa.gov

SO DUMMY!!! what extra judicial killings occurred? FACTS not simple wild ass guesses by people who don't know how to use the Internet!!!

 

[Yarddog]

I'm sorry, but capture isn't a solution. You Democrats have filled our courts with activist judges who just let them out after capture to go back to drug trafficking.


Let me explain the two-tiered system of justice that currently exists in America:

• Democrats and Drug Cartel Members are above the law
• Republicans and victims of Drug Cartel Members are thrown in jail or murdered by drug overdose
• The Drug Cartels are still killing our people and making billions
• Democrats and some Republicans still get their "Campaign Donations" from drug and human-trafficking

End of story.

Status Quo has not been working, the proof has been in the results but here we have people clamouring for more status quo. It's what the cartels have counted on for years. I'm thinking its very likely those boats could also toss their cargo overboard if need be when encountered by coast guard.

Theres a great way though to stop the bombing of drug boats, Venezuela can just stop sending them!