Those of you against destruction of the drug-hauling boats... question...

[jknowgood]

Except they salvaged that balloon and determined it hadn't been transmitting for some time. Oh, yeah, and it was full of weather equipment, not spy equipment.

Biden lied to you again.

 

[j-mac]

Obama was acting in accordance with the broad powers granted to combat Al Qaeda.

These fishing boats aren't in Al Qaeda.

"Ooh, there was an American Citizen in that Terror Camp in Yemen. Let's cry some crocadile tears."

Nope, not crying at all…but don’t for one second think that the action didn’t set a precedent…

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Thank God, it not for a know nothing like you to decide...

WOW.


So, when do we start bombing the boats coming out of the ports of The Bahamas, Belize, Bolivia, Burma, the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Panama and Peru?

 

[dblack]

Let's say several missiles were launched against the USA that contained drugs that could kill millions of Americans.
Would you still be against shooting down the missiles?

That's a really stupid question. Are you trying to make a point?

Keep trying. I have no idea what you're getting at.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Nope, not crying at all…but don’t for one second think that the action didn’t set a precedent…

A precedent for what?

Twisting laws to try to make them applicable for the orange retard and his regime?

 

[berg80]

If they had all this information

Why not intercept and arrest ?

Same with the boats

They have them on camera

Why not follow them and have the coastguard apprehend them?

Generalissimo trump views the military as his personal army he gets to do with as he pleases. Something not uncommon among leaders of authoritarian governments.

Maybe he's thinking, "Putin gets to push people out windows, why can't I kill some brown people in boats?"

 

[mudwhistle]

You're a lying dumb ass.
That's your cult and your regime.

Pete Hegseth told US soldiers in Iraq to ignore legal advice ...​

View attachment 1191351
The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com › us-news › dec › hegseth...
5 days ago — Pete Hegseth told US soldiers in Iraq to ignore legal advice on rules of engagement ... Geneva conventions. Hegseth is currently under scrutinyfor a 2 September attack on a boat purportedly carrying drugs in the Caribbean, where survivors of a first strike on the vessel were reportedly killed in a second strike following a verbal order from Hegseth to “kill everybody”.


Pete Hegseth, the US defense secretary, told soldiers under his command in Iraq to ignore legal advice about when they were permitted to kill enemy combatants under their rules of engagement.

The anecdote is contained in a book Hegseth wrote last year in which he also repeatedly railed against the constraints placed on “American warfighters” by the laws of war and the Geneva conventions.

Hegseth has denied giving the order and retained the support of Donald Trump. The US president said Hegseth told him “he did not say that, and I believe him, 100%”.

The Guardian is no different than the Democrat Underground or The Daily Kos.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

FACT dummy! Use the Internet!!!
Question I asked.."can missiles carrying nuclear bombs carry poisonous drugs instead"
Answer dummy!
Yes, a missile that is designed to carry a nuclear warhead could physically carry a chemical warhead containing poisonous agents instead, as has been done historically.

Chemical Weapons Primer

Learn about chemical agents, key precursors, and the chemical weapon production and weaponization process. 1. Introduction Chemical weapons cause injury or death by means of their high toxicity, usually when inhaled or in contact with the skin. The first widespread use of such arms on th

www.wisconsinproject.org

Assume that these imaginary drug missiles have "Made in China" written on them, what then?

 

[mudwhistle]

Same goes for Cuba.
Did either country attack international shipping or foreign citizens?

So, we should bomb all boats in their territorial/international waters that have travel advisories?

Nope,.....only the drug boats coming from Venezuela. You're trying to insert fake scenarios into the discussion to pose some illegitimate "What If" that doesn't exist.

You leftist idiots would argue till your face turns blue for anything your masters want.

We've spelled out in detail the fact that Obama, Biden, and Clinton all used their authority (granted by congress years ago) to do exactly what you libs claim Trump is doing illegally.

Only now is this an issue simply because Democrats and their corrupt media made it into an issue.

 

[berg80]

Typical Marxist.

View attachment 1191372View attachment 1191373

Posting those memes only serves to display your inability to articulate a cogent argument in your own words.

 

[berg80]

The Guardian is no different than the Democrat Underground or The Daily Kos.

Why rely on disparaging the source and not refute the substance of the reporting. I suspect because the former is easier than the latter..........the latter being beyond your capacity.

 

[mudwhistle]

Posting those memes only serves to display your inability to articulate a cogent argument in your own words.

Yeah....posting a valid meme that applies to the subject at hand is a clear indication of retardation, right?

Not hardly.

A meme is usually used when you've talked to an idiot, who refuses to listen to reason, till you're blue in the face.

It's a form or RIDICULE.

 

[berg80]

Not knowing where you got this from, because you didn't post a link.

AI.

 

[berg80]

Yeah....posting a valid meme that applies to the subject at hand is a clear indication of retardation, right?

Retardation? No. Intellectual laziness? Yes.

 

[mudwhistle]

Why rely on disparaging the source and not refute the substance of the reporting. I suspect because the former is easier than the latter..........the latter being beyond your capacity.

Well, glad you asked.

The source's reputation has bearing on the validity of the information they produce.

How many times have you nimrods told us that you want reliable sources.....and then turn around and claim that only Leftist Approved Sources count?

If the source has a bad reputation and practices misinformation.....why must we believe your sources?

 

[berg80]

It's a form or RIDICULE.

It's a form of fatuousness on the part of the person who uses them.

 

[mudwhistle]

Retardation? No. Intellectual laziness? Yes.

That's only your biased opinion.

Sorry if you folks can't meme worth shit.

 

[healthmyths]

That's a really stupid question. Are you trying to make a point?

Keep trying. I have no idea what you're getting at.

The point is obvious to most intelligent people. And obviously you aren't one as you don't seem to
see there is no distinction. A missile containing nuclear bombs is no different than a missile carrying poisonous toxins that can kill people. So why are democrats against the destruction of boat/missiles carrying drugs that can kill Americans? They both kill Americans... but those of you against destruction of the boats or missiles obviously hate Americans! So why are you living here?

 

[dblack]

The point is obvious to most intelligent people.

Sorry. I've read your posts. I don't trust your assessment of "intelligent".

 

[berg80]

Well, glad you asked.

The source's reputation has bearing on the validity of the information they produce.

How many times have you nimrods told us that you want reliable sources.....and then turn around and claim that only Leftist Approved Sources count?

If the source has a bad reputation and practices misinformation.....why must we believe your sources?

Having a bad reputation in trumpworld most often means the reporting is spot on. The more accurate the report the louder Dotard screams "fake news."