Going against the current scientific consensus is a risky move. You had better have extraordinary proof to back up extraordinary claims.
Consensous be damned. The left’s consensus was that Nick Sandmann harassed an old Native American man and look how that turned out.
The government and the people pushing the vaccine did not have extraordinary proof or evidence that the vaccine was safe and effective when they foisted it on us in the first place. Otherwise they wouldn’t have given the pharmaceutical companies immunity from lawsuits.
If it’s true that the vaccine is relatively safe and effective -and I’m not saying it is - it was only through sheer luck, not because they knew it was.
In addition, in the beginning, it was touted as a true vaccine that would prevent infection. It did not. So the narrative had to change and was then touted as slowing the spread. It did not. Then they came out with boosters and the narrative was basically the same except, vaccinated and boostered people still got it and still transmitted it.
Out of necessity, the narrative finally had to settle for: The vaccine eases symptoms and survival is more likely.
Even if this is true,
keep in mind that this was not how the vaccine was touted in the beginning. Why? Because they simply didn’t know.
They played catchup with this virus and the vaccine from the start because they didn’t know shit about it, in spite of the fact that
Fauci funded the Chinese to study the fucking thing.
Vaccines, medical procedures and medications go through years of tests and trials before being approved and even then, some turn out to do more harm than good and have to be taken off the shelves.
This crap was developed and ramrodded through in a matter of months. No fucking way was I letting that shit anywhere near me.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
