Hi Daniel:
Okay guys I'm not here to start any fights and will not comment about the person saying that to say it was is either stupid or whatever.
These USMB members will fight no matter if you comment or not. ;0)
Daniel obviously did NOT read the Opening Post. Try again once you have actually read the topic. The Pentagon 'was' struck by a refitted A-3 Skywarrior at 9:36:27 AM that was painted up to look like an American Airlines Jetliner. That is the jetliner evidence that you saw.
That statement is clearly false and disproved by the photographic evidence:
This is a picture taken from standing in A/E Drive looking through the C-ring hole into the D and E ring areas that are all under a single roof.
This is another picture taken from A/E Drive facing north showing the C-ring wall on your left and the B-ring wall to your right that has NO DAMAGE. If your landing gear went through to the B and A rings, then there would be a hole in this B-ring wall.
These are state-of-the-art high-speed Pentagon Security Cameras and not your your phone cam. There is NO WAY any 100-ton Jetliner crashed into the Pentagon, or we would have seen that evidence in the A/E Drive photos above. You be real!
This is the little E-ring hole where you say a 100-ton Jetliner crashed going 500 miles per hour. And yet, the windows above the 18-feet 3-inch second-story hole are not broken from a Jetliner that is five-stories tall! You say a real 100-ton Jetliner flew over those cable spools and did not break third-story windows, when that is impossible.
Bullony! Your testimony is already proven false and you have no evidence to support a single word of anything and you know it.
The refitted A-3 Skywarrior 'did' have landing gear, but that has nothing to do with any AA-77 Jetliner. Daniel is obviously unaware of the fact that American Airlines has never issued the N644AA registry number to any 757 jetliner in history (
my topic). Daniel is unaware of the fact that
AA11 and AA77 were canceled on 9/11 (link #1 from
Pentagon Timeline). Daniel is unaware of the fact that the
Govt Documentation proves 9/11 was an inside job (
topic), because he was DUPED by Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld's "Black Operation" on 9/11.
Also if you have questions about my credentials just put my name in a search engine and you should come up with at least 3 articles including a book that I've been in. If not then you should find at least ONE.
Daniel Nimrod
9/11 Pentagon Rescuer/Survivor
We have testimony from hundreds of Pentagon witnesses that completely disagree with you, because Dan was DUPED and made up his mind to swallow the Official Cover Story LIE hook, line and sinker on day one ...
GL,
Terral
Yes Daniel is another loyal dupe of both the Bush and Obama administrations that has been brainwashed by the propaganda of the media and government and the agents that have penetrated this site because like Terral said,we have hundreds of pentagon testimonys that completey disagree with him but we have loyal OCTA'S here who have bought into the 9/11 coverup commission hook,line, and sinker.
They know nothing about science because they dont even question how its possible that an airliner made of aluminum can go through a wall much smaller than the hole we see in the wall and yet two STEEL engines somehow cant.
the OCTA'S cant give an answer to where is the luggage on the airliner either.they also cant get around that the pentagon is the most sophisticated air defense system in the world and they have protocols to follow to shoot down an aircraft if it does not reply which did not happen.
and that cameras were illegally confiscated by the FBI at a nearby gas station and a hotel across the street or that with hundreds of cameras in the pentagon all they can produce is 5 flimsy pics of the ALLEGED airliner crashing into the wall of the pentagon which is HARDLY evidence of an airliner. they know good and well that we should have seen an airliner coming into the pentagon with all their cameras they have there yet they cant produce that.lol.
Daniel here has been taken in by agents such as candycorn and
rat in the hat who could only fling shit in defeat like his handlers pay them to when called out on that over on that thread he made addressed to me. these OCTA'S here are also so much in denial that they ignore a newsman who waas on the lawn there saying there is NO EVIDENCE of an airliner crashing.
they can only sling shit in defeat.They will post something back to try and get around it of some other newsman saying there was eveidence of it like Toto has in the past but Toto is so stupid he doesnt know that THAT newsman is a CIA plant in the media ,they got them everywhere.congress discovered that in the 70's when they came across documents from a freedom of information act.
loyal Octa's like Toto and Daniel though dont want to know about that though and want to keep their head buried in the sand like the loyal OCTA's they are.
But more than anything,the agents here and the OCTA'S like Daniel cant get around the FACT that it would be impossible for an airliner to do all those manueverabilitys the 9/11 commission said they did with an airliner when experts pilots themselves have said THEY could never do that.
also the OCTA'S like Daniel here cant get around that pic you show Terral of the front lawn of the pentagon.If an airliner HAD crashed there,the ground would not be all green like that pic shows,it would be burned and chared to pieces and black everywhere you loyal Bush dupe fools.
obviously you OCTA"s have NEVER seen an airliner crash before.you want to keep your head buried in the sand and ignore what expert pilots say and rather listen to what the corporate controlled media and corrupt government agencys tell you? go ahead.make yourselves look like morons and stupid idiot fools.
i love it,their logic is priceless on WHO they choose to listen to.I cant get over it.
