Zone1 Is it the "New Covenant"? "Old Covenant"? Or,.... The "Renewed Covenant"?

[ding]

Like I said, it is not the words that are irrational it is the ignorant superstitious archaic lore completely divorced from reality, YOUR BELIEFS, that have absolutely no value at all except to the talking serpent that beguiled you. For cash.

The talking serpent represents the Pharaoh who wore a serpent on his head. It was written by Moses to teach Hebrew children about the dangers of losing your mind for life to a con artist, a cult leader, expert in the magical arts, sorcery, what is now well known as mind control. Here is the timeless wisdom of incalculable value. Even so it didn't stop you from being beguiled by a direct descendant of that ever elusive talking serpent of old because you have been diverted into hell by superstitious archaic lore and lost your soul, your sanity.

What you fail to understand is that the early accounts are from Sumerian times when polytheism was the dominant religion of the land. The beliefs expressed in Genesis about a creator God that is moralistic and providential but did not control the affairs of men were a radical departure from polytheistic beliefs.

Google is your friend.

Biblical accounts, particularly those in Genesis, share notable similarities with older myths from other ancient Near Eastern cultures, leading many scholars to conclude they were adapted, rather than "stolen," to express Israelite monotheistic beliefs. The biblical authors reworked common literary motifs to convey their unique theological message.

Key examples of these parallels include:

• The Flood Narrative: The story of Noah and the Ark shares significant plot details with the flood account in the much older Epic of Gilgamesh and the even earlier Atrahasis Epicfrom Mesopotamia.
  • Similarities: In both, a divine figure or council of gods decides to send a great flood to destroy humanity; a chosen man (Noah/Utnapishtim) is warned and instructed to build a large boat; animals are brought on board to preserve life; birds are sent out after the flood to check for dry land; the vessel lands on a mountain; and sacrifices are offered afterward.
  • Differences: The biblical account features one all-powerful God acting for moral reasons (human wickedness), while the Mesopotamian versions involve a pantheon of squabbling gods who are annoyed by human noise or simply choose to wipe them out, with one god breaking ranks to save his favorite human.
• Creation Accounts: The Genesis 1 creation story has parallels with the Babylonian creation myth, the Enuma Elish.
  • Similarities: Both describe a primeval watery chaos before creation, the separation of waters by a firmament (sky), the creation of light before the sun and moon, and a similar sequence of events leading to a period of divine rest. The Hebrew word for the "deep" (tehom) in Genesis is linguistically related to the name of the chaos goddess Tiamat in the Enuma Elish.
  • Differences: Genesis is strictly monotheistic and portrays a sovereign, peaceful creation by divine command ("God said, 'Let there be...'"), while the Enuma Elish is polytheistic and involves a violent cosmic battle between the gods. Humans in Genesis are created in God's image and given dominion, while in the Enuma Elish, humans are created from the blood of a slain god to serve as the gods' slaves.

In essence, the ancient Israelites were part of the wider ancient Near Eastern culture and "breathed the same air". Their scribes used existing cultural and literary forms to present a revolutionary new idea: the existence of a single, all-powerful, and just God who created the world and humanity with purpose. The shared motifs help place the biblical texts within their historical context, but the theological emphasis remains uniquely Israelite.

 

[hobelim]

No, it doesn't. Scholars widely believe the serpent in the Adam and Eve story (Genesis 3) draws from older Sumerian and Mesopotamian myths, particularly figures like the god Ea (sometimes called a serpent) and Ningishzida (Lord of the Good Tree), who were associated with wisdom, trees, and immortality, mirroring the serpent's role in tempting humans away from eternal life in the biblical narrative, much like the Epic of Gilgamesh features a serpent stealing the plant of youth.

So what if other cultures venerated the serpent, In Genesis 3:14 the TALKING serpent is relegated to the lowest place in society by my God as the lowest of all HUMAN lifeforms.

"Lower than cattle and all the wild beasts of the field."

If you didn't immediately understand when you were a child that the crafty talking serpent in the Genesis story, like the big bad wolf, represents a despicable human archetype, a con, a malignant narcissist then you do have my condolences. Being dead in hell must surely suck.

I bet the wild beasts of the field start drooling when they smell you coming from a mile away.

In Hebrew the word for serpent, Nachash, is both a noun and an adjective meaning snake, brazen, shiny one, or someone who practices the magical arts, sorcery, what is now known as hypnotism, brainwashing or mind control, the feared and revered STARS of the ancient world, like the pharaoh who could talk, practiced sorcery, and wore a serpent on his head.

Damn.

Maybe in another few thousand years AI or Google, your friend, lol, will figure it out for you.

 

[ding]

So what

It means you are wrong.

 

[hobelim]

It means you are wrong.

Okey dokey. lol

Anyway I would like to thank you from the bottom of my heart for helping me to reveal the timeless wisdom of my God in giving the command to refrain from the flesh of anything that crawls on its belly, a direct reference to the talking serpent, and for perfectly demonstrating the deeply disturbing and terrifying death, a curse, for setting that simple instruction aside.

Right now from every walk of life people are joining together to undo the work of the devil.

Praise God! Thank you Jesus! Amen! Hallelujah! God is great! Woo hoo! ooh ooh ahh ahh!

 

[ding]

Okey dokey. lol

Anyway I would like to thank you from the bottom of my heart for helping me to reveal the timeless wisdom of my God in giving the command to refrain from the flesh of anything that crawls on its belly, a direct reference to the talking serpent, and for so generously revealing the deeply disturbing and terrifying death, a curse, for setting that simple instruction aside.

You're welcome but you aren't telling me anything you haven't told me a thousand times. So I can only assume you are telling me that for your benefit and not mine.

 

[hobelim]

You're welcome but you aren't telling me anything you haven't told me a thousand times. So I can only assume you are telling me that for your benefit and not mine.

Yes, its not for your benefit and no, its not for mine. No one reveals hidden teaching to enlighten themselves. And as I told you a thousand times you are a corpse strapped to a gurney being dissected in an open arena to determine the cause of death for the benefit of dedicated medical students. WATCHING. Seeing how you respond to simple truths will convince even the most devoted Atheist that there is such a thing as what the authors of scripture called Divine condemnation, death, a curse, the loss of your very soul, life itself.

Using unique terminology to explain well known mental health issues, the causes and cure.

So let me explain your conundrum. You were force fed irrational and delusional beliefs. You were also told that Satan is an invisible disembodied entity that attacks your "faith" in the absurd and warned that any rational question or objection to that crap that arises within your own mind is a demonic attack from the devil himself. Scary. What this did was turn your mind against itself creating a state of cognitive dissonance effectively rendering your ability to be aware, honest and rational, dead. Dead as a corpse without "the breath of life".

¡Despertar! ¿Entiendes? Pinche payaso.

 

[ding]

Yes, its not for your benefit and no, its not for mine.

Don't be silly. Hate makes you feel good. That's why you do it.

 

[hobelim]

Don't be silly. Hate makes you feel good. That's why you do it.

Fascinating!

And some people don't believe in "the death", a curse, the loss of sanity for failing to heed the teaching in kashrut to stand guard over the sanctity of your own mind the seat of consciousness and lens through which your experience of life is seen as either good or evil.

Imagine that!

 

[ding]

Fascinating!

And some people don't believe in "the death", a curse, the loss of sanity for failing to heed the teaching in kosher law and failing to stand guard over the sanctity of your own mind.

Imagine that!

Hate can feel good because it triggers brain chemicals like dopamine, creates strong group bonds (tribalism), offers a sense of purpose/validation, and provides an outlet for negative feelings, making people feel energized and righteous, especially when directed at an "out-group". It simplifies the world, reinforces existing beliefs, and provides a simple "us vs. them" narrative that can be emotionally gratifying, though often destructive in the long run,.

Psychological & Social Reasons

• Tribal Connection: Hate strengthens bonds within a group (in-group) by uniting against a common enemy (out-group), tapping into evolutionary instincts for survival, as seen in heated rivalries.
• Sense of Purpose: Hating a group or institution can give people a clear focus, meaning, and a feeling of determination, making them feel energized and significant.
• Validation & Control: It can feel good to vent anger and hatred as it provides an outlet for personal frustrations and can give a sense of control or power, sayReddit users and Quora users.
• Simplicity: Hate offers simple explanations for complex problems, confirming a person's worldview and creating a "just world" feeling by assigning blame.

Biological & Neurological Reasons

• Neurochemical Release: Hate, like other strong emotions, can release neurotransmitters such as dopamine (pleasure), serotonin (mood), and oxytocin (bonding), creating a "happy hormone" rush, especially when shared.
• Behavioral Activation: It activates the brain's "behavioral activation system," leading to feelings of eagerness and enthusiasm, while suppressing the inhibition system (uncertainty).

Potential Pitfalls (The Other Side)

• While these feelings can be powerful and feel good in the moment, psychologists note that relying on hate for purpose is often unsustainable and can lead down harmful paths.
• The "happiness" derived from hate is often fleeting and rooted in adrenaline, not true contentment, which comes from positive emotions like joy and love.

 

[hobelim]

Hate can feel good

You might want to take some time out of your busy day playing with your friend Google and consider the remote possibility that I am just right. No hatred at all is involved or necessary.

You are like a drunk who gets angry at the person who wakes them up abruptly by saying "Get out!", and then goes back to sleep pissed off without noticing their house is on fire.

If you feel something like hatred from me because I told you in the nicest way possible that one God, my God, is not three or edible, it is because your own conscience convicts you.

The fires of hell are singeing your soul.

 

[ding]

You might want to take some time out of your busy day playing with your friend Google and consider the remote possibility that I am just right. No hatred at all is involved or necessary.

You are like a drunk who gets angry at the person who wakes them up abruptly by saying "Get out!", and then goes back to sleep pissed off without noticing their house is on fire.

If you feel something like hatred from me because I told you in the nicest way possible that one God, my God, is not three or edible, it is because your own conscience convicts you.

The fires of hell are singeing your soul.

I don't accept anything blindly. I question everything. The thing you need to realize is that I'm not shooting from the hip. My beliefs are based upon good reasons. So it is much more convenient to use AI to support what I already know. So I especially use AI when I am dealing with idiots who are unreasonable. I'm not going to waste a lot of my time on them. I prefer to skip the fighting and go straight to winning. A bee doesn't spend much time trying to convince a fly that honey tastes better than shit.

 

[hobelim]

I don't accept anything blindly.

Now thats really funny! Mr cut and paste friend of Google, mangod cracker eater. Blind believer that 3 coequal gods, one part human, is the same as 1 unequalled incorporeal God.


Thanks for the laughs!

 

[ding]

Now thats really funny! Mr cut and paste. Blind believer that three coequal gods is the same as one unequalled God

Thanks for the laughs!

I'll even copy and paste Karl Marx quotes from time to time, like "communism is naturalized humanism." So despite Karl being wrong about most things, he was right about that and that's the only criteria I use for pasting quotes or analysis from AI, it has to be correct.

Which is probably why you hate when I do it because it's used to prove you wrong.

 

[hobelim]

I'll even copy and paste Karl Marx quotes from time to time, like "communism is naturalized humanism." So despite Karl being wrong about most things, he was right about that and that's the only criteria I use for pasting quotes or analysis from AI, it has to be correct.

Which is probably why you hate when I do it because it's used to prove you wrong.

No, you have only proven that artificial intelligence is not very intelligent, as least not as intelligent as any child who understands that any talking serpent written about in any fairy tale is a metaphor for a human being, a fucked up lowlife one, but human nevertheless.

I guess when AI can run around the schoolyard and hear children calling each other snakes, pigs, dogs, rats, it might get it. You on the other hand might never get it. You have faith.

 

[ding]

No, you have only proven that artificial intelligence is not very intelligent, as least not as intelligent as any child who understands that any talking serpent written about in any fairy tale is a metaphor for a human being, a fucked up lowlife one, but human nevertheless.

I guess when AI can run around the schoolyard and hear children calling each other snakes, pigs, dogs, rats, it might get it. You on the other hand might never get it. You have faith.

That's odd because I haven't seen you even try to refute it. All I've seen you do is cry about it.

 

[ding]

No, you have only proven that artificial intelligence is not very intelligent, as least not as intelligent as any child who understands that any talking serpent written about in any fairy tale is a metaphor for a human being, a fucked up lowlife one, but human nevertheless.

I guess when AI can run around the schoolyard and hear children calling each other snakes, pigs, dogs, rats, it might get it. You on the other hand might never get it. You have faith.

When someone makes a complaint or "cries about" another person using AI, but does not offer specific evidence or counterarguments to the points made, their reaction could be interpreted in several ways:

• Emotional reaction: It may indicate that the person is feeling defensive or frustrated and is reacting emotionally rather than logically [1]. They might be upset about the concept of AI being used in the context of the conversation, rather than a specific issue with how it was used or the facts presented.
• Ad hominem attack: The complaint might be a form of ad hominem attack, where the person shifts focus away from the validity of the argument itself and instead attacks the tool used to present it [1]. This could be a tactic to distract from the substance of the issue, especially if they cannot effectively refute the argument itself.
• Implied concession: The lack of a factual rebuttal could suggest that the person implicitly accepts the validity of the AI-generated points [1]. By focusing solely on the use of the tool, they avoid directly engaging with the facts, potentially because they have no strong counter-arguments.
• General bias against AI: The person may hold a general bias or strong negative feelings about AI technology. Their comment might not be about the specific situation at all, but rather a reflection of their personal beliefs that AI use is inherently wrong or unacceptable in certain contexts, regardless of the content's accuracy [1].

Ultimately, without engaging with the facts, the person using AI may view the "crying" as an attempt to invalidate their contribution through an emotional appeal or a diversionary tactic rather than a substantive critique.

 

[ding]

Look ^^^^, AI proved what I thought was correct. So glad I used AI to rebut an ignoramus instead of wasting my time doing so.

The bee doesn't waste his time trying to convince the fly that honey tastes better than shit.

 

[ding]

one God, my God, is not three or edible

It's funny but your belief in one God (i.e no such thing as the Trinity) doesn't bother me at all. I've never taken exception with that belief. But my belief in the Trinity bothers you so much that pretty much every post you have ever addressed to me in this forum is about expressing that displeasure.

And don't for a minute think about arguing you are doing it for God. In all of your posts you have never praised God one single time. You couldn't be more transparent about your true nature and motivation.

 

[ding]

 

[ding]

GLASNOST ?