This is what a rational reaction looks like.

Yea, they'll never find a way to off themselves without guns.
These morons like Berg love their non sequiturs. They don't take into account the sick individuals who take others out in their suicidal quest. A couple in this area had their lives permanently altered by a suicidal driver who crossed the center line and hit them head on, injuring him and nearly killing her. The guilty driver had a DNR sign taped to their chest. SMH. They lost their business and the lady is still recovering over two years later. Maybe we should ban cars.
 
  • Risk in the Home: Contrary to the belief that guns in the home provide security, multiple studies suggest that people living in homes with guns are at a significantly higher risk of dying by homicide or suicide than those in gun-free households.

In the same study it was found that in households without water folks are thirsty.
 
During the past 40 years crime has declined. In that same period millions more guns were sold. How could that happen?
Accidents from cars is far greater, bikes and swimming pools too.
Guns stop over 1 million crimes in any year.

It's almost like the more people there are the more the same $h!t happens.

Except for guns.

Decades ago I'm coming outta the grocery store with my kids, only three(3) of them then, it's raining, a new Mustang is doing donuts in the lot and crashed into a curb. Naturally I pointed and laughed while they were looking at the damage. They yell at me that they gonna kick my azz so when I get to the truck I go under the seat to get my nun chucks cause I can't wait to do this and one goes "he's got a gun" and flees.

Didn't even have a gun, does that count?
 
If people



map 1.5.webp


want restrictions on the 1st amendment, should we do that?

If there is enough of them and they abide by the rules to amend The Mighty US of A Constitution, yes.

And then I'm a criminal.
 
If anything people should be even more armed. If the shooter knew that EVERYONE around him was armed, he may not have done it. If everyone is armed and someone pulls a gun with intention to do a mass shooting, they'll be shot dead on the scene and rightfully so by someone around them. Without being well armed in public you are a sitting duck to criminals who are armed.

Exactly what the liberal wants. We shouldn't be able to defend ourselves, that's Mother governments job. Create dependency on the state. Foster criminal behavior to the point that for our own good all those pesky so-called right needs be obliterated.

The liberals are mostly all control freaks that can't have the likes of me saying what I say cause they are weak fu(ks with zero ability to debate me on mutha fu(kin anything so that's got to stop but they are willing to use THEIR guns to stop me from doing so.
 
You should apply to be the spokesman for the NRA. More guns = more shooting deaths.

AI Overview

Research consistently indicates a strong correlation between a higher prevalence of guns and an increased rate of shooting deaths from suicide, homicide, and unintentional injuries.
AI overview is for morons.

Think for yourself, or at least attempt to.
 
If libtards can't enforce the thousands of gun laws already on the books, they sure as hell aren't going to enforce new laws.

They just wish to disarm regular citizens and let their deranged criminal pets run free, so we all beg for protection from the Nanny State they wish to impose.
 
There'd be people getting shot over parking spots. Or because they didn't get pickles on their burger at the fast food joint.

Welcome to America. Sure, it's all a bit of a sticky wicket but same question to you...

You have left the little Ms. at home while outta town selling Sombreros, Maple Syrup and Rice. A n-word with a spear, a south-of-the-border type with a switch blade and a cracker with a 2x4 with a nail in the end kicks open her front door, announce they gonna skull fu(k her to death and steal all her $h!t. She pulls a 38 from under the throw pillow you got her for Valentines Day that says "hands up, don't shoot" and she blows them all away. Got a problem with that?

The liberal wants her to be skull fu(ked to death. The insult aren't for you.
 
As they should be. For crying out loud, these morons are getting $22/hr and they can't remember to put pickles on my burger? They deserve to burn in hell.

I doubt is about ones ability to remember things. But you support killing someone because they forgot something. I would've been dead at the age of 5. Who TF doesn't forget something?
 
15th post
Not to mention an increase in accidental shootings. Like kids getting a hold of the gun in the house and shooting someone by mistake.

Maybe your kids. I have children, do you?

It isn't a coincidence that what Australia did after the mass killing there years ago resulted in no mass killings since until a few days ago.

Now compare that to how many Aussies have had crime committed upon them because they aren't armed.

You don't want innocent folks to be able to protect themselves.

kenison 1.1.webp
 
This is not a rational reaction to the Bondi Beach massacre. All the left wing antisemites are yelling gun control! gun control, but if you point out the guns were used by fanatical Islamists to kill Jews, they yell, Islamophobia! Islamophobia!

The Australian government has allowed the seeds of antisemitic hatred to blossom on Australian soil and added to it with passionate anti Israel rants, all to avoid offending fanatically antisemitic Muslim countries, and has tried to defend this incitement to violence with whimpers about free speech, and now this same guilty government pretends to be surprised when all this anti Israel/antisemitic incitement manifests itself at Bondi Beach.

approved 1.2.webp
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom