There's a price to be paid for retribution.

You made no such clear example. Take your lame, unproven allegations and shove them.

...​



You have a choice. To engage in discussion of events and issues or to shit talk.

If you shit talk, you are maginalizing yourself.

YOU are making the call that all you have to offer, is shit.


That is your call, about what you have to give. YOURS.


Try to hate yourself less.
 
Thanks for sharing that Lawfare piece—it’s a solid read. And yeah, if anything, it confirms how bad the “FISA mess” really was. Seventeen documented screw-ups? That’s a breakdown.

What stood out to me was how Lawfare described the problem: not partisan sabotage, but an FBI culture where “no one checked the wiring before flipping the switch.” A system failure, not a conspiracy.

That distinction matters. If we frame it as corruption, we chase scapegoats. If we frame it as rot, we fix the system.

Either way, the trust damage is real—and we’re still paying for it.
I contend any loss of faith from the FISA warrant incident is largely due to the purposeful circulation of misinformation by trump and RWM who tried to frame it as political bias against trump. Moreover, systemic problems are not the same thing as trump ordering the purge of officials involved in his criminal investigations. The latter being a much more serious problem.
 
You have a choice. To engage in discussion of events and issues or to shit talk.

If you shit talk, you are maginalizing yourself.

YOU are making the call that all you have to offer, is shit.


That is your call, about what you have to give. YOURS.


Try to hate yourself less.
Now that you have that tantrum out of your system you are free to try to give me a clear, fact based, example of weaponization. Not rhetorical garbage without substantiation from credible sources.
 
I contend any loss of faith from the FISA warrant incident is largely due to the purposeful circulation of misinformation by trump and RWM who tried to frame it as political bias against trump. Moreover, systemic problems are not the same thing as trump ordering the purge of officials involved in his criminal investigations. The latter being a much more serious problem.
This moron doesn’t see the bias in DOJ leadership knowingly presenting lies to the court to get fake warrants to go after Biden’s #1 political opponent. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Now that you have that tantrum out of your system you are free to try to give me a clear, fact based, example of weaponization. Not rhetorical garbage without substantiation from credible sources.
The RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA hoax, stupid.
 
I contend any loss of faith from the FISA warrant incident is largely due to the purposeful circulation of misinformation by trump and RWM who tried to frame it as political bias against trump. Moreover, systemic problems are not the same thing as trump ordering the purge of officials involved in his criminal investigations. The latter being a much more serious problem.
🥨🥨🥨
:fu:
 
Indeed there is a price to be paid....I doubt the traitorous scumbuckets will pay it, though....

1751727116673.webp
 
I contend any loss of faith from the FISA warrant incident is largely due to the purposeful circulation of misinformation by trump and RWM who tried to frame it as political bias against trump. Moreover, systemic problems are not the same thing as trump ordering the purge of officials involved in his criminal investigations. The latter being a much more serious problem.
ConBias.webp
 
I contend any loss of faith from the FISA warrant incident is largely due to the purposeful circulation of misinformation by trump and RWM who tried to frame it as political bias against trump.
Jesus, I can't believe that you are this dense...The whole story is out about that...And, Obama was unsuccessful in turning our intel agencies against their opponent...The "misinformation" comes from clowns like you.
Moreover, systemic problems are not the same thing as trump ordering the purge of officials involved in his criminal investigations. The latter being a much more serious problem.
:laughing0301: Yes, yes, we know the tired playbook from mindless drones like you....It's never the Ds fault, they are victims of the system....Give me a break!
 
Jesus, I can't believe that you are this dense...The whole story is out about that...And, Obama was unsuccessful in turning our intel agencies against their opponent...The "misinformation" comes from clowns like you.

:laughing0301: Yes, yes, we know the tired playbook from mindless drones like you....It's never the Ds fault, they are victims of the system....Give me a break!
Rather than taking the time to methodically dismantle your horseshit post, inspired by the misinformation I mentioned previously, I'll refer you to this article which does the job for me.

 
I contend any loss of faith from the FISA warrant incident is largely due to the purposeful circulation of misinformation by trump and RWM who tried to frame it as political bias against trump. Moreover, systemic problems are not the same thing as trump ordering the purge of officials involved in his criminal investigations. The latter being a much more serious problem.
That’s an interesting angle—and if it’s true that some of these officials were involved in an investigation built on bad evidence, and then later got dismissed under Trump’s second term... isn’t that kind of poetic justice?

I mean, if you help wire up a leaky system and then get reassigned when the thing shorts out, it’s hard to act shocked <see what I did there :)>. Consequences might feel political, but that doesn’t always mean they’re unjust.

Not saying every firing was righteous—but it’s worth asking: if the roles were reversed, wouldn’t we call it accountability?
 
Rather than taking the time to methodically dismantle your horseshit post, inspired by the misinformation I mentioned previously, I'll refer you to this article which does the job for me.

Well, well, shocker, in your article here there seems to be lots of excuse making, and navel gazing to deflect that the FISA abuse in 2015 wasn't political...And Mr. Wittes explanation for that? Well, he says, mistakes are made all the time....Nothing to see here....Bullshit...

Got anything credible?
 
That’s an interesting angle—and if it’s true that some of these officials were involved in an investigation built on bad evidence, and then later got dismissed under Trump’s second term... isn’t that kind of poetic justice?
You took quite a leap there by implying the investigation was compromised because of largely clerical errors on the FISA warrant application forms. The key finding from Horowitz's report being the lack of evidence there was any political bias in the application or approval of the warrants. There was ample evidence available to justify looking in to trump's actions irrespective of the information inspiring the FISA warrant applications.

The criteria for the removal of FBI officials by trump was simply that they participated in or approved investigations in to members of his 1/6 mob or himself. Not only for his failed coup but for his theft of classified docs and subsequent refusal to comply with a subpoena for their return. No evidence has been made public that shows the firings were justified.
 
Well, well, shocker, in your article here there seems to be lots of excuse making, and navel gazing to deflect that the FISA abuse in 2015 wasn't political...And Mr. Wittes explanation for that? Well, he says, mistakes are made all the time....Nothing to see here....Bullshit...

Got anything credible?
Your desire to dismiss an article reducing your premise to a steaming pile of dung is hardly surprising. Better luck next time.
 
15th post
You took quite a leap there by implying the investigation was compromised because of largely clerical errors on the FISA warrant application forms. The key finding from Horowitz's report being the lack of evidence there was any political bias in the application or approval of the warrants. There was ample evidence available to justify looking in to trump's actions irrespective of the information inspiring the FISA warrant applications.

The criteria for the removal of FBI officials by trump was simply that they participated in or approved investigations in to members of his 1/6 mob or himself. Not only for his failed coup but for his theft of classified docs and subsequent refusal to comply with a subpoena for their return. No evidence has been made public that shows the firings were justified.
:spinner:weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
 
Your desire to dismiss an article reducing your premise to a steaming pile of dung is hardly surprising. Better luck next time.
You’re the one searching for only that which you agree with..Can’t you see that?
 
You took quite a leap there by implying the investigation was compromised because of largely clerical errors on the FISA warrant application forms. The key finding from Horowitz's report being the lack of evidence there was any political bias in the application or approval of the warrants. There was ample evidence available to justify looking in to trump's actions irrespective of the information inspiring the FISA warrant applications.

The criteria for the removal of FBI officials by trump was simply that they participated in or approved investigations in to members of his 1/6 mob or himself. Not only for his failed coup but for his theft of classified docs and subsequent refusal to comply with a subpoena for their return. No evidence has been made public that shows the firings were justified.
You just keep in mind how you would restrain a President when a D wins, if that ever happens again….
 
You’re the one searching for only that which you agree with..Can’t you see that?
You're so cute when you flail around waving your arms to make up for any credibility with your pathetic trolling. A tactic you've mastered. But in the end, you've got nothing.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom