NotfooledbyW
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 24,075
- 4,719
- 245
Because you imply you hold the higher moral ground while still defending a policy that killed more people than the situation normally would have.
I did not defend the policy. I posted some facts about it. You have not challenged the facts. All you could do is diss the fact gatherer because you reject what the facts reveal.
What source are you relying on?
You state that Cuomo’s policy killed more people than the situation normally would have. How many more and how did you determine the number of deaths caused by Cuomo’s policy vs the number of deaths that were caused by staff and visitors and inadequate disinfection.
It was done to free up hospital beds for those that needed them more.
I’m not sure what your policy would have been in NYC had Cuomo and the other two governors in the Tri-State area not shut the businesses and shows down.
The hospitals and the nursing homes would have had bodies pilling up in the parking lots. People dying in their homes with no way to treat them. But what the hell eh? They would be mostly poor and close to dying anyway.
I believe you oppose Cuomo’s shut down policy that saved thousands of lives early on in the pandemic. Something like this:
Cuomo should not have shut down one if the most important economic states in the country. Damn him, leave it up to the libertarians to decide for themselves because they are the smartest people on earth.
Those close to death 26906429
Most of the deaths have involved people that were close to death already. The longer term problems have to do with people out of work and in poverty. I care more about those people than those close to death already. The fate of the healthy has longer term economic implications.
“Does the owner of the restaurant own his restaurant? Or does the government own his restaurant?” Rand Paul.
Last edited: