There is simply no denying it is time for "common sense" gun laws

[P@triot]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

Lets talk about being "so far up your own ass" and "brainless ideas" junior. Here one woman was able to prevent her own rape and/or murder by two men because she was armed. And you want to take that a way from her. Gee...I wonder why?

Fatal Wound: Armed Florida Homeowner Exchanges Gunshots With Robbery Suspects

I never said that. Correct it or you'll be reported.

Do it bitch! I never said Bill O'Reilly was a "douchebag" but you accused me of that. I bet USMB takes my side on this. Want to bet, bitch?

 

[westwall]

Conservative hero Bill O'Reilly:

“There is too much gun crime in the USA, and high-powered weaponry is too easy to get,” O’Reilly said.

O’Reilly and others seem to consider the AR-15 as a heavy weapon. “That’s the fact. So let’s deal with it. We all have the right to bear arms, but we don’t have the right to buy and maintain mortars. Even if you feel threatened by gangsters or a New World Order. No bazookas, no Sherman tanks, no hand grenades,” O’Reilly said.

Implying Congress does indeed have the power to act, O’Reilly said, “That’s because the Second Amendment clearly states the government has a right to regulate militias, made up of individuals. They have that right in the name of public safety. Therefore, Congress should debate what kind of weapons should be available for public sale.”

O'reilly is a jackass. Always has been, always will be. Funny how you progressives attack him constantly, then slobber all over him when he shows his true colors. Guess what nimrod, he's not conservative.

 

[TheOldSchool]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

Lets talk about being "so far up your own ass" and "brainless ideas" junior. Here one woman was able to prevent her own rape and/or murder by two men because she was armed. And you want to take that a way from her. Gee...I wonder why?

Fatal Wound: Armed Florida Homeowner Exchanges Gunshots With Robbery Suspects

I never said that. Correct it or you'll be reported.

Do it bitch! I never said Bill O'Reilly was a "douchebag" but you accused me of that. I bet USMB takes my side on this. Want to bet, bitch?

Sure let's see what happens.

 

[P@triot]

More of the liberal false narrative throughly debunked....

Men Comply with Armed Robber. He Shoots Them Anyway

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It’s impossible to tell if most on the right are dishonest about ‘gun control’ or simply ignorant.

For example, there are regulatory measures that can be enacted which have nothing to do with the regulation of firearms per se, that place no further ‘restrictions’ on the sale or possession of firearms, measures that comport with current Second Amendment jurisprudence, such as funding for states to allow them to make more timely, comprehensive updates to the NICS database, and providing Americans access to comprehensive mental health treatment.

 

[TheOldSchool]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

Lets talk about being "so far up your own ass" and "brainless ideas" junior. Here one woman was able to prevent her own rape and/or murder by two men because she was armed. And you want to take that a way from her. Gee...I wonder why?

Fatal Wound: Armed Florida Homeowner Exchanges Gunshots With Robbery Suspects

I never said that. Correct it or you'll be reported.

Do it bitch! I never said Bill O'Reilly was a "douchebag" but you accused me of that. I bet USMB takes my side on this. Want to bet, bitch?

Sure let's see what happens.

Yup either you or a mod corrected it. Thank you. Now carry on embarrassing yourself.

 

[P@triot]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

Lets talk about being "so far up your own ass" and "brainless ideas" junior. Here yet another armed homeowner preventing themselves from becoming a victim. And you want to take that a way from her. Gee...I wonder why?

Armed Homeowner Shoots Alleged Home Intruder in the Groin

 

[Billy000]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

So you admit you do not want "common sense" gun laws? You want oppression and control. Brainless is ignoring the reality that everywhere guns are banned - horrific tragedies occur. And wherever guns are prevalent, peace and lawfulness ensue.

And let's examine the "good guy" scenario. Many concealed carried people may have good intentions, but many of them probably know next to nothing about gun safety. How do you think that would turn out?

How does that work out? Well...if you knew what you were talking about...you would know that it works out amazingly every time. Millions and millions of crimes prevented by gun owners. That's just the reality. Just admit that you do not want "common sense" gun laws. You want control and oppression.

It's actually statistically rare for a gun owner to actually foil a mass shooter in a public area.

It doesn't have to be a "mass shooter". Every single day in America, an armed citizen stops a murder, armed robbery, or rape. Every day. Why should I be murdered or my wife raped just because you're a pussy? The U.S. Constitution guaranteed you liberty. It did not guarantee you safety or security. If liberty is too scary for you, there are a slew of nanny state socialist nations that would love to have more labor to exploit. Go live your liberal utopia.

Yeah and everyday people get shot for stupid fucking reasons. Doesn't that bother you?

It does! A lot! That "stupid fucking reason" is people like you insisting that we have gun-free victim zones. Armed people don't get shot.

Yeah and blindly arming more people gives more guns to nutjobs. You see how that works? I know you cons love that childish fantasy of you dropping a bad guy with your holster weapon, but it doesn't make any sense to think it works even most of the time.

 

[P@triot]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

Lets talk about being "so far up your own ass" and "brainless ideas" junior. Here yet another armed homeowner preventing themselves from becoming a victim. And you want to take that a way from her. Gee...I wonder why?

Armed Montana Homeowner Drops Burglar With One Bullet

 

[P@triot]

So you admit you do not want "common sense" gun laws? You want oppression and control. Brainless is ignoring the reality that everywhere guns are banned - horrific tragedies occur. And wherever guns are prevalent, peace and lawfulness ensue.

How does that work out? Well...if you knew what you were talking about...you would know that it works out amazingly every time. Millions and millions of crimes prevented by gun owners. That's just the reality. Just admit that you do not want "common sense" gun laws. You want control and oppression.

It's actually statistically rare for a gun owner to actually foil a mass shooter in a public area.

It doesn't have to be a "mass shooter". Every single day in America, an armed citizen stops a murder, armed robbery, or rape. Every day. Why should I be murdered or my wife raped just because you're a pussy? The U.S. Constitution guaranteed you liberty. It did not guarantee you safety or security. If liberty is too scary for you, there are a slew of nanny state socialist nations that would love to have more labor to exploit. Go live your liberal utopia.

Yeah and everyday people get shot for stupid fucking reasons. Doesn't that bother you?

It does! A lot! That "stupid fucking reason" is people like you insisting that we have gun-free victim zones. Armed people don't get shot.

Yeah and blindly arming more people gives more guns to nutjobs. You see how that works? I know you cons love that childish fantasy of you dropping a bad guy with your holster weapon, but it doesn't make any sense to think it works even most of the time.

If it doesn't make any sense - then why do tragedies only occur where guns are banned? You take a position so absurd - you can't even attempt to support it with facts. You just make a bizarre one line sentence and you run. Answer the question: why do tragedies only occur where guns are banned???

How many mass shootings in the White House? By your "logic", it should happen daily since there are hundreds of men and women armed with fully automatic weapons on the grounds.

How many mass shootings at police stations? By your "logic", it should happen daily since there are hundreds of men and women armed with weapons.

How many mass shootings at NRA meetings? By your "logic", it should happen every time there there are many hundreds of men and women armed with firearms.

 

[P@triot]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

Lets talk about being "so far up your own ass" and "brainless ideas" junior. Here yet another armed homeowner (a woman) preventing themselves from becoming a victim of a rape or murder. And you want to take that a way from her. Gee...I wonder why?

Detroit Home Intruder Learns When a Woman Tells You She’s Armed, You Really Should Listen

 

[P@triot]

Yeah and blindly arming more people gives more guns to nutjobs. You see how that works? I know you cons love that childish fantasy of you dropping a bad guy with your holster weapon, but it doesn't make any sense to think it works even most of the time.

Can I ask why you insist on a false narrative? Is it because you know that you can't defend your position? Removing restrictions on where citizens can carry their firearms doesn't create more armed people. The only way for more people to get more guns is for them to purchase them. We are not talking about purchasing firearms. I never mentioned that. We're talking about expanding where existing gun owners can exercise their right to bear arms.

Incidentally, I've added roughly half a dozen links or so now backing up what I've stated with facts. I've noticed you don't have anything to back up your bizarre opinions.

 

[JBond]

We have seen it far too often. Way too many tragic and unnecessary deaths. We have reached the point that no honest person could deny that it is time for "common sense" gun laws. Barack Obama has preached this for 8 straight years now and he has been right all along.

Wherever guns are banned (public schools, universities, movie theaters, etc.) - horrific tragedy ensues. Wherever guns are prevalent (White House, police departments, NRA meetings, etc.) peace and security ensues. Anybody with "common sense" would look at the indisputable reality and immediately implement "common sense" gun laws which would permit firearms everywhere, all the time. Fully automatic weapons in every building (just the Secret Service has while the president is in public). Teachers with guns on them. College students conceal carrying.

Anybody who doesn't support these basic "common sense" gun laws clearly isn't interested in public safety, preserving human life, or security. Instead they are simply interested in control. This one is so obvious - both sides can agree on it. Again - unless someone is more interested in a control/oppression agenda.

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

And let's examine the "good guy" scenario. Many concealed carried people may have good intentions, but many of them probably know next to nothing about gun safety. How do you think that would turn out?

Why would you assume many cc people know next to nothing about guns safety?

 

[Billy000]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

Lets talk about being "so far up your own ass" and "brainless ideas" junior. Here yet another armed homeowner preventing themselves from becoming a victim. And you want to take that a way from her. Gee...I wonder why?

Armed Montana Homeowner Drops Burglar With One Bullet

Ok so you are providing me an example of someone protecting their home as a rebuttal? I never said fhis didn't happen. Yes, plenty of good people own guns. The obvious point i am making is that making guns as accessible as you are suggesting increases the chances of more nutjobs getting guns. Either that, or retards with poor judgement that have no concept of what it means to own a gun responsibly.

How hard is this figure out?

 

[Billy000]

We have seen it far too often. Way too many tragic and unnecessary deaths. We have reached the point that no honest person could deny that it is time for "common sense" gun laws. Barack Obama has preached this for 8 straight years now and he has been right all along.

Wherever guns are banned (public schools, universities, movie theaters, etc.) - horrific tragedy ensues. Wherever guns are prevalent (White House, police departments, NRA meetings, etc.) peace and security ensues. Anybody with "common sense" would look at the indisputable reality and immediately implement "common sense" gun laws which would permit firearms everywhere, all the time. Fully automatic weapons in every building (just the Secret Service has while the president is in public). Teachers with guns on them. College students conceal carrying.

Anybody who doesn't support these basic "common sense" gun laws clearly isn't interested in public safety, preserving human life, or security. Instead they are simply interested in control. This one is so obvious - both sides can agree on it. Again - unless someone is more interested in a control/oppression agenda.

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

And let's examine the "good guy" scenario. Many concealed carried people may have good intentions, but many of them probably know next to nothing about gun safety. How do you think that would turn out?

Why would you assume many cc people know next to nothing about guns safety?

I'm sure many of them do understand gun safety.

 

[Billy000]

Yeah and blindly arming more people gives more guns to nutjobs. You see how that works? I know you cons love that childish fantasy of you dropping a bad guy with your holster weapon, but it doesn't make any sense to think it works even most of the time.

Can I ask why you insist on a false narrative? Is it because you know that you can't defend your position? Removing restrictions on where citizens can carry their firearms doesn't create more armed people. The only way for more people to get more guns is for them to purchase them. We are not talking about purchasing firearms. I never mentioned that. We're talking about expanding where existing gun owners can exercise their right to bear arms.

Incidentally, I've added roughly half a dozen links or so now backing up what I've stated with facts. I've noticed you don't have anything to back up your bizarre opinions.

What? You do realize that you have failed to explain WHY expanding would not increase the risk of more nutjobs getting ahold of guns, right?

 

[JBond]

We have seen it far too often. Way too many tragic and unnecessary deaths. We have reached the point that no honest person could deny that it is time for "common sense" gun laws. Barack Obama has preached this for 8 straight years now and he has been right all along.

Wherever guns are banned (public schools, universities, movie theaters, etc.) - horrific tragedy ensues. Wherever guns are prevalent (White House, police departments, NRA meetings, etc.) peace and security ensues. Anybody with "common sense" would look at the indisputable reality and immediately implement "common sense" gun laws which would permit firearms everywhere, all the time. Fully automatic weapons in every building (just the Secret Service has while the president is in public). Teachers with guns on them. College students conceal carrying.

Anybody who doesn't support these basic "common sense" gun laws clearly isn't interested in public safety, preserving human life, or security. Instead they are simply interested in control. This one is so obvious - both sides can agree on it. Again - unless someone is more interested in a control/oppression agenda.

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

And let's examine the "good guy" scenario. Many concealed carried people may have good intentions, but many of them probably know next to nothing about gun safety. How do you think that would turn out?

Why would you assume many cc people know next to nothing about guns safety?

I'm sure many of them do understand gun safety.

You said many know nothing about safety. I am sure you have some reputable stats to back that up. They board should see your stats so they can make their own decision.

 

[Billy000]

It's actually statistically rare for a gun owner to actually foil a mass shooter in a public area.

It doesn't have to be a "mass shooter". Every single day in America, an armed citizen stops a murder, armed robbery, or rape. Every day. Why should I be murdered or my wife raped just because you're a pussy? The U.S. Constitution guaranteed you liberty. It did not guarantee you safety or security. If liberty is too scary for you, there are a slew of nanny state socialist nations that would love to have more labor to exploit. Go live your liberal utopia.

Yeah and everyday people get shot for stupid fucking reasons. Doesn't that bother you?

It does! A lot! That "stupid fucking reason" is people like you insisting that we have gun-free victim zones. Armed people don't get shot.

Yeah and blindly arming more people gives more guns to nutjobs. You see how that works? I know you cons love that childish fantasy of you dropping a bad guy with your holster weapon, but it doesn't make any sense to think it works even most of the time.

If it doesn't make any sense - then why do tragedies only occur where guns are banned? You take a position so absurd - you can't even attempt to support it with facts. You just make a bizarre one line sentence and you run. Answer the question: why do tragedies only occur where guns are banned???

How many mass shootings in the White House? By your "logic", it should happen daily since there are hundreds of men and women armed with fully automatic weapons on the grounds.

How many mass shootings at police stations? By your "logic", it should happen daily since there are hundreds of men and women armed with weapons.

How many mass shootings at NRA meetings? By your "logic", it should happen every time there there are many hundreds of men and women armed with firearms.

What do you even know about the correlation between gun free zones and gun crime? You're just making shit up as you go along.

 

[SwimExpert]

Conservative hero Bill O'Reilly:

“There is too much gun crime in the USA, and high-powered weaponry is too easy to get,” O’Reilly said.

O’Reilly and others seem to consider the AR-15 as a heavy weapon. “That’s the fact. So let’s deal with it. We all have the right to bear arms, but we don’t have the right to buy and maintain mortars. Even if you feel threatened by gangsters or a New World Order. No bazookas, no Sherman tanks, no hand grenades,” O’Reilly said.

Implying Congress does indeed have the power to act, O’Reilly said, “That’s because the Second Amendment clearly states the government has a right to regulate militias, made up of individuals. They have that right in the name of public safety. Therefore, Congress should debate what kind of weapons should be available for public sale.”

O'Reilly is an idioit. And unlike you, I've always been consistent about that. You're just sucking his dick for now because it's convenient.

 

[Billy000]

We have seen it far too often. Way too many tragic and unnecessary deaths. We have reached the point that no honest person could deny that it is time for "common sense" gun laws. Barack Obama has preached this for 8 straight years now and he has been right all along.

Wherever guns are banned (public schools, universities, movie theaters, etc.) - horrific tragedy ensues. Wherever guns are prevalent (White House, police departments, NRA meetings, etc.) peace and security ensues. Anybody with "common sense" would look at the indisputable reality and immediately implement "common sense" gun laws which would permit firearms everywhere, all the time. Fully automatic weapons in every building (just the Secret Service has while the president is in public). Teachers with guns on them. College students conceal carrying.

Anybody who doesn't support these basic "common sense" gun laws clearly isn't interested in public safety, preserving human life, or security. Instead they are simply interested in control. This one is so obvious - both sides can agree on it. Again - unless someone is more interested in a control/oppression agenda.

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

And let's examine the "good guy" scenario. Many concealed carried people may have good intentions, but many of them probably know next to nothing about gun safety. How do you think that would turn out?

Why would you assume many cc people know next to nothing about guns safety?

I'm sure many of them do understand gun safety.

You said many know nothing about safety. I am sure you have some reputable stats to back that up. They board should see your stats so they can make their own decision.

Well, where is your evidence that any CC is trained and responsible? You see how that works? I don't need evidence to know that SOME cc's are responsible and SOME aren't. It's just common sense.