Reaction White House Had To Orlando Shooting

[Clementine]

It was the policies of the Obama administration that allowed this shooting. First, the investigation into Mateen's threats to coworkers was dropped and they pretended it was just the coworkers being unfair to the poor terrorist.

Then, the Obama administration pressured G4S into hiring more Muslims and it meant doing a half-ass background check. That ensured the guy got a gun, so even if he didn't have a personal gun, he was given one for work.

Considering his background, he shouldn't have passed a background check. But, because he is Muslim, he was given a pass where others would have been tagged.

The 'refugees" coming in are getting an even bigger pass. It's all in the name of being fair to Muslims, even though we know nothing about them and we're supposed to ignore the horrible problems other countries have faced due to these economic refugees.

Obama owns this, whether the left admits it or not. It was Obama who decided to favor Muslims with employment. It was Obama's FBI that dropped the investigation on Mateen. It was Obama's administration that made sure the background check by G4S was minimal.

Of course, when a shooting happens, all this administration can think about is how to use it to their advantage.



"One senior White House official told the insider that if "shooting up 30 8-year-olds in suburban Connecticut didn’t change any minds," a massacre of 1,000 homosexuals during Pride Week wouldn’t matter.

"(N)obody would give a f***," the official said.

In fact, the official went on to say that the White House couldn’t even spin the story because nobody cared about a "bunch of queers," and that it would simply be "bad politics" to try and do so.

Perhaps more damning, another White House official, also described by our contact as "senior," added that the administration didn’t want anyone to look into the matter very closely.

When asked why, the official pointed out that Mateen had been hired by G4S, a company that, along with other security firms, had been "leaned on" by the Obama administration to hire Muslims.

Those companies had been encouraged to "look the other way a little bit" when it came to background checks to ensure they weren’t hiring a "bunch of white weekend warriors playing Army."

If these responses indicate how the Obama administration as a whole reacted to the shooting, it is sick in more ways than one.

First, it demonstrated how very little it cares about the LGBT community — which is shocking considering their rhetoric and how much Democrats have come to depend on their vote.

Second, it showed how the administration has shown blatant favoritism to Muslims — over homosexuals, blacks, Hispanics, women or any other group.

G4S has been one of the biggest contractors for the U.S. government after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, but now has come under scrutiny for hiring an apparent Islamic State group sympathizer."





http://conservativetribune.com/insider-leaks-to-orlando-shooting/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=THENewVoice&utm_content=06/15/2016&utm_campaign=manualpost

 

[Rexx Taylor]

this is how i saw it,,,,,uhh,,,uhmm,,,err,,,,oh well....chit happens,,,i blame george bush, and uhhh,,sorry, but i need to go golfing,, have a nice day.

 

[edthecynic]

The Trump radicalized NRA armed terrorist had nothing to do with the white house!

 

[Clementine]

The guy's father preached hatred so he likely never had a healthy view of non-Muslims.

In 2013, he threatened coworkers and told them he was a member of a terrorist group. That investigation was shut down over claims of Islamophobia on the part of the coworkers.

Then Obama pressured security companies to hire Muslims with no serious background check and they were given guns. NRA had nothing to do with the FBI background check that Obama ensured the guy would pass.

It's on him. Can't blame Trump or anyone else. The guy was raised to be radical and hate infidels. A Muslim speaker travels to mosques, including the ones in Orlando, and tells them that gays must die. So typical of a lib to ignore all the facts and desperately try to pin it on their political foes.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Then Obama pressured security companies to hire Muslims with no serious background check and they were given guns.

^
That sentence should be read over and over and over..

 

[Rexx Taylor]

If I had a son, he would of looked like that gay black man who survived the shooting with an arm and a leg missing

 

[edthecynic]

Then Obama pressured security companies to hire Muslims with no serious background check and they were given guns.

^
That sentence should be read over and over and over..

"Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it."
- Adolf Hitler

 

[Rexx Taylor]

and not one peep from michelle? oh, wait, she hates everyone,,i forgot

 

[The Irish Ram]

Then Obama pressured security companies to hire Muslims with no serious background check and they were given guns.

^
That sentence should be read over and over and over..

"Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it."
- Adolf Hitler

Obama is giving tax breaks to companies that hire illegals over Americans. If you haven't caught on by now, that our Muslim president is trying to turn America into just another Muslim shit hole, then you need to catch up, and pay close attention to the same agenda in France and Germany, and the results of Muslim aggression everywhere else, and rise up and say no to it in America. Say it to your representatives and governors on their web pages. Call them. Do something.

 

[Manonthestreet]

And now we find out he quit his job and "sold" his house to his sister for $10.................. 2 monthes before the attack.....

 

[jknowgood]

The Trump radicalized NRA armed terrorist had nothing to do with the white house!

It was the Obama homeland security that gave this man a pass. Let's not forget about that.

 

[ninja007]

It was the policies of the Obama administration that allowed this shooting. First, the investigation into Mateen's threats to coworkers was dropped and they pretended it was just the coworkers being unfair to the poor terrorist.

Then, the Obama administration pressured G4S into hiring more Muslims and it meant doing a half-ass background check. That ensured the guy got a gun, so even if he didn't have a personal gun, he was given one for work.

Considering his background, he shouldn't have passed a background check. But, because he is Muslim, he was given a pass where others would have been tagged.

The 'refugees" coming in are getting an even bigger pass. It's all in the name of being fair to Muslims, even though we know nothing about them and we're supposed to ignore the horrible problems other countries have faced due to these economic refugees.

Obama owns this, whether the left admits it or not. It was Obama who decided to favor Muslims with employment. It was Obama's FBI that dropped the investigation on Mateen. It was Obama's administration that made sure the background check by G4S was minimal.

Of course, when a shooting happens, all this administration can think about is how to use it to their advantage.



"One senior White House official told the insider that if "shooting up 30 8-year-olds in suburban Connecticut didn’t change any minds," a massacre of 1,000 homosexuals during Pride Week wouldn’t matter.

"(N)obody would give a f***," the official said.

In fact, the official went on to say that the White House couldn’t even spin the story because nobody cared about a "bunch of queers," and that it would simply be "bad politics" to try and do so.

Perhaps more damning, another White House official, also described by our contact as "senior," added that the administration didn’t want anyone to look into the matter very closely.

When asked why, the official pointed out that Mateen had been hired by G4S, a company that, along with other security firms, had been "leaned on" by the Obama administration to hire Muslims.

Those companies had been encouraged to "look the other way a little bit" when it came to background checks to ensure they weren’t hiring a "bunch of white weekend warriors playing Army."

If these responses indicate how the Obama administration as a whole reacted to the shooting, it is sick in more ways than one.

First, it demonstrated how very little it cares about the LGBT community — which is shocking considering their rhetoric and how much Democrats have come to depend on their vote.

Second, it showed how the administration has shown blatant favoritism to Muslims — over homosexuals, blacks, Hispanics, women or any other group.

G4S has been one of the biggest contractors for the U.S. government after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, but now has come under scrutiny for hiring an apparent Islamic State group sympathizer."





http://conservativetribune.com/insider-leaks-to-orlando-shooting/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=THENewVoice&utm_content=06/15/2016&utm_campaign=manualpost

And they dont care about the elderly, the sick, poor or blacks either.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

hardly any democrat had anything to say about it. well maxine? Baba boxer? stuart smalley? any response?

 

[hazlnut]

It was the policies of the Obama administration that allowed this shooting. First, the investigation into Mateen's threats to coworkers was dropped and they pretended it was just the coworkers being unfair to the poor terrorist.

Then, the Obama administration pressured G4S into hiring more Muslims and it meant doing a half-ass background check. That ensured the guy got a gun, so even if he didn't have a personal gun, he was given one for work.

Considering his background, he shouldn't have passed a background check. But, because he is Muslim, he was given a pass where others would have been tagged.

The 'refugees" coming in are getting an even bigger pass. It's all in the name of being fair to Muslims, even though we know nothing about them and we're supposed to ignore the horrible problems other countries have faced due to these economic refugees.

Obama owns this, whether the left admits it or not. It was Obama who decided to favor Muslims with employment. It was Obama's FBI that dropped the investigation on Mateen. It was Obama's administration that made sure the background check by G4S was minimal.

Of course, when a shooting happens, all this administration can think about is how to use it to their advantage.



"One senior White House official told the insider that if "shooting up 30 8-year-olds in suburban Connecticut didn’t change any minds," a massacre of 1,000 homosexuals during Pride Week wouldn’t matter.

"(N)obody would give a f***," the official said.

In fact, the official went on to say that the White House couldn’t even spin the story because nobody cared about a "bunch of queers," and that it would simply be "bad politics" to try and do so.

Perhaps more damning, another White House official, also described by our contact as "senior," added that the administration didn’t want anyone to look into the matter very closely.

When asked why, the official pointed out that Mateen had been hired by G4S, a company that, along with other security firms, had been "leaned on" by the Obama administration to hire Muslims.

Those companies had been encouraged to "look the other way a little bit" when it came to background checks to ensure they weren’t hiring a "bunch of white weekend warriors playing Army."

If these responses indicate how the Obama administration as a whole reacted to the shooting, it is sick in more ways than one.

First, it demonstrated how very little it cares about the LGBT community — which is shocking considering their rhetoric and how much Democrats have come to depend on their vote.

Second, it showed how the administration has shown blatant favoritism to Muslims — over homosexuals, blacks, Hispanics, women or any other group.

G4S has been one of the biggest contractors for the U.S. government after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, but now has come under scrutiny for hiring an apparent Islamic State group sympathizer."





http://conservativetribune.com/insider-leaks-to-orlando-shooting/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=THENewVoice&utm_content=06/15/2016&utm_campaign=manualpost

Okay, so you've copy/pasted some sort of far-right blog brain fart. Some idiot sits in his mommy's basement vomiting his conspiracy theory rants on the internet and there YOU are to copy paste it here for our... entertainment(?).

I read it and honestly I can't make heads or tails of it. Usually you can find some sort of insane logic connection the conspiracy dots... but this one is a humdinger of an insanely incoherent rant.

Good on you.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It was the policies of the Obama administration that allowed this shooting. First, the investigation into Mateen's threats to coworkers was dropped and they pretended it was just the coworkers being unfair to the poor terrorist.

Then, the Obama administration pressured G4S into hiring more Muslims and it meant doing a half-ass background check. That ensured the guy got a gun, so even if he didn't have a personal gun, he was given one for work.

Considering his background, he shouldn't have passed a background check. But, because he is Muslim, he was given a pass where others would have been tagged.

The 'refugees" coming in are getting an even bigger pass. It's all in the name of being fair to Muslims, even though we know nothing about them and we're supposed to ignore the horrible problems other countries have faced due to these economic refugees.

Obama owns this, whether the left admits it or not. It was Obama who decided to favor Muslims with employment. It was Obama's FBI that dropped the investigation on Mateen. It was Obama's administration that made sure the background check by G4S was minimal.

Of course, when a shooting happens, all this administration can think about is how to use it to their advantage.



"One senior White House official told the insider that if "shooting up 30 8-year-olds in suburban Connecticut didn’t change any minds," a massacre of 1,000 homosexuals during Pride Week wouldn’t matter.

"(N)obody would give a f***," the official said.

In fact, the official went on to say that the White House couldn’t even spin the story because nobody cared about a "bunch of queers," and that it would simply be "bad politics" to try and do so.

Perhaps more damning, another White House official, also described by our contact as "senior," added that the administration didn’t want anyone to look into the matter very closely.

When asked why, the official pointed out that Mateen had been hired by G4S, a company that, along with other security firms, had been "leaned on" by the Obama administration to hire Muslims.

Those companies had been encouraged to "look the other way a little bit" when it came to background checks to ensure they weren’t hiring a "bunch of white weekend warriors playing Army."

If these responses indicate how the Obama administration as a whole reacted to the shooting, it is sick in more ways than one.

First, it demonstrated how very little it cares about the LGBT community — which is shocking considering their rhetoric and how much Democrats have come to depend on their vote.

Second, it showed how the administration has shown blatant favoritism to Muslims — over homosexuals, blacks, Hispanics, women or any other group.

G4S has been one of the biggest contractors for the U.S. government after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, but now has come under scrutiny for hiring an apparent Islamic State group sympathizer."





http://conservativetribune.com/insider-leaks-to-orlando-shooting/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=THENewVoice&utm_content=06/15/2016&utm_campaign=manualpost

More conservative propaganda.

 

[waltky]

Granny says, "Dat's right - it's about protectin' the public from jihadis...

Pelosi On 'No-Fly, No-Buy' Bill: ‘I Don’t Think It Has Anything to Do With the 2nd Amendment’
June 16, 2016 – House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) claimed that the Democrats’ "no-fly, no-buy" bill, which would keep those on the government's terror watch list from buying guns, doesn’t have “anything to do with the Second Amendment.”

“I think it has everything to do with our oath of office to keep the American people safe,” she said during her weekly press briefing Thursday on Capitol Hill. CNSNews.com asked Pelosi if curtailing the Second Amendment rights of Americans to “keep and bear arms” protects the nation from radical Islamic terrorism. Pelosi would not give a “yes” or “no” answer, adding that “the Second Amendment is like every other amendment. It, as in the Heller decision from the Supreme Court, can be clarified,” she said. Pelosi then compared it to the First Amendment, pointing out that despite the right to free speech, it “doesn’t enable you to cry fire in a theater or if you're in the press, to libel people. There are standards. And same thing with the Second Amendment. As the Supreme Court said in the Heller decision, affirming that the Second Amendment is a right to bear arms, but that actions can be taken in relation to it.”

Pelosi emphasized that terrorists should not be able to buy guns, pointing to her support of the “no-fly, no buy” legislation. "And to say that if you think, if you're stating that if you can't buy, if you're on a terrorist fly list, your should be able to buy guns or else we're curtailing somebody else's right to bear arms, then I don't subscribe to that. And I don't think most people do. “Eighty-seven percent of the American people say ‘pass no-fly, no-buy. Seventy -some percent of those are Republicans, 70-some of them are members of the NRA. I don’t think it has anything to do with the Second Amendment. I think it has everything to do with our oath of office to keep the American people safe.”

CNSNews asked Pelosi again if the right to keep and bear arms helps protects Americans from terrorism. She replied: “I think what we saw in Orlando is a coming together of national security, homeland security and gun safety. And I don't see a relationship to unfettered, let people who are on a no-fly list buy a gun is in furtherance of the national security of our country."

Pelosi On 'No-Fly, No-Buy' Bill: ‘I Don’t Think It Has Anything to Do With the 2nd Amendment’

See also:

Calling It Radical Islamic Terrorism Exposes Obama's Failure 'To Keep Our Country Safe'
June 16, 2016 | In reaction to President Barack's Obama's condescending speech on Tuesday about why he doesn't use the words "radical Islam" in reference to radical Islamic terrorism, such as the June 12 attack in Orlando, Fla., conservative leader and talk-radio host Tony Perkins said "words have meaning" and in labeling such terrorism accurately as "radical Islam" exposes the president's failure "to keep our country safe."

Since 9/11, there have been "43 incidents" whereby Islamic jihadists have killed innocent people, said Perkins on the June 14 edition of "Washington Watch" radio. And Obama "knows it's true" that by labeling these incidents as examples of radical Islam proves he "has failed America," and this agitates him. “Since 9/11, [there have been] 43 incidents Islamic jihadists have killed," said Tony Perkins, host of "Washington Watch" and president of the Family Research Council (FRC). "Now some, as I mentioned, have been labeled ‘workplace violence,’ and other things, domestic disputes, so on and so forth. But they are people that were driven by this radical ideology." "And yes, you have to identify it," said Perkins. "This is not just extremists. Notice how this administration, anything they -- when you talk about extremism, they put members of the Republican Party in that category. They would label Christians — and have — as extremists. They would [label] returning veterans from combat as those that need to be monitored.”

“Words have meaning and calling this what it is, is the first step to defeating it and stopping it," said Perkins, a veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps. "That’s why it was very clear when the president made his speech today that the challenges by Republican lawmakers and others, who have challenged him on this, was getting under his skin – because he knows it’s true." "That’s why, that’s why he’s agitated because this has exposed this president and his administration," said Perkins. "And Americans, I hope, are waking up, that this is a deadly game of political correctness."

Perkins continued, "And the president has failed. The president has failed America. He’s failed to keep our country safe. And I think it’s willful, by the failed policies that he has continued to pursue that will not call the threat what it is. The record speaks for itself." Tony Perkins is married and has five children. He regularly speaks on political and social issues as president of the pro-family Christian group Family Research Council.

Perkins: Calling It Radical Islamic Terrorism Exposes Obama's Failure 'To Keep Our Country Safe'