PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
Unbeknownst to themselves, dummies decry traditional religion while bowing their head to their own religion, Militant Secularism. One denomination of MS religion is the cult of Darwinism. As much as it is trumpeted by Secularists, there is no proof of same.
"Darwinism, by contrast, is an essential ingredient in secularism, that aggressive, quasi-religious faith without a deity. The Sternberg case seems, in many ways, an instance of one religion persecuting a rival, demanding loyalty from anyone who enters one of its churches -- like the National Museum of Natural History.ā The Branding of a Heretic
There is far more evidence for the God of the Bible. Examples on this thread.
1.We donāt often think about it, but we are lucky on this board to have some of the dumbest human beings around, folks for whom it wouldnāt be uncharacteristic to put the opposite shoes on their feet. Youād see āem walkinā around, oblivious, as they are about even important things. Anyway, weād miss out on a lot of humor, and also, the inspiration to dash off responses, sometimes impolite ones.
Sometimes those dummies open the door to the discussion.
2. The other day, one of the dumbest was irate that I posted criticism of a saint in his religion, Darwinism, and he wrote this:
āthere is MORE evidence that evolution is TRUE than that the bible is true.
in fact...THERE IS NO EVIDENCE that god exists at all!ā
Real Scienceā¦Not Darwin
BIG LETTERS!!! He sure was mad. But, he did cause me to consider if there is any evidence for the existence of God.
3. And he represents many of those who, no doubt, vote Democrat, and call themselves Liberals or Progressives, you know, the ātolerantā folks. And they get really nasty if you donāt bow down to their god.
"It's shocking how much venom and bile you can stir up by criticizing Darwin in public. I more or less expected, when I wrote a post critical of evolutionary theory at BigThink.com, there'd be a few heated comments. I didn't expect so many of the 600+ comments to be so heated. Quite a few of the comments were and are just plain ugly. And the most vitriolic attacks came not from the religious right, but from supporters of Darwin! "
Scientists should be humble, not arrogant
4. Funny thing is, lots of actual scientists write critical papers disputing Darwinism, and many are religious folks, as well.
"According to a survey of members of the American Assn. for the Advancement of Science, conducted by the Pew Research Center in May and June this year, a majority of scientists (51%) say they believe in God or a higher power, while 41% say they do not.
ā¦the public does not share scientistsā certainty about evolution. While 87% of scientists say that life evolved over time due to natural processes, only 32% of the public believes this to be true, according to a different Pew poll earlier this year.
[As for Darwin himself, the] concluding sentence of āOrigin of Speciesā speaks of a āCreatorā breathing life āinto a few forms or into one.ā
What do scientists think about religion? - Los Angeles Times
Is that what the Darwinist fanatics so afraid of??
5. Hereās an interesting point from Dennis Prager:
āIn my lifetime alone, science went from positing a universe that always existed to positing a universe that had a beginning (the Big Bang). So, in just one generation [the Bible], in describing a beginning to the universe, went from conflicting with science to agreeing with scienceā¦.[The Bible] should not violate essential truths (for example, it accurately depicts human beings as the last creation).ā
And thatās not the only corresponding point between modern science and a belief in Godā¦.
And the Darwinists cannot abide by it.
"Darwinism, by contrast, is an essential ingredient in secularism, that aggressive, quasi-religious faith without a deity. The Sternberg case seems, in many ways, an instance of one religion persecuting a rival, demanding loyalty from anyone who enters one of its churches -- like the National Museum of Natural History.ā The Branding of a Heretic
There is far more evidence for the God of the Bible. Examples on this thread.
1.We donāt often think about it, but we are lucky on this board to have some of the dumbest human beings around, folks for whom it wouldnāt be uncharacteristic to put the opposite shoes on their feet. Youād see āem walkinā around, oblivious, as they are about even important things. Anyway, weād miss out on a lot of humor, and also, the inspiration to dash off responses, sometimes impolite ones.
Sometimes those dummies open the door to the discussion.
2. The other day, one of the dumbest was irate that I posted criticism of a saint in his religion, Darwinism, and he wrote this:
āthere is MORE evidence that evolution is TRUE than that the bible is true.
in fact...THERE IS NO EVIDENCE that god exists at all!ā
Real Scienceā¦Not Darwin
BIG LETTERS!!! He sure was mad. But, he did cause me to consider if there is any evidence for the existence of God.
3. And he represents many of those who, no doubt, vote Democrat, and call themselves Liberals or Progressives, you know, the ātolerantā folks. And they get really nasty if you donāt bow down to their god.
"It's shocking how much venom and bile you can stir up by criticizing Darwin in public. I more or less expected, when I wrote a post critical of evolutionary theory at BigThink.com, there'd be a few heated comments. I didn't expect so many of the 600+ comments to be so heated. Quite a few of the comments were and are just plain ugly. And the most vitriolic attacks came not from the religious right, but from supporters of Darwin! "
Scientists should be humble, not arrogant
4. Funny thing is, lots of actual scientists write critical papers disputing Darwinism, and many are religious folks, as well.
"According to a survey of members of the American Assn. for the Advancement of Science, conducted by the Pew Research Center in May and June this year, a majority of scientists (51%) say they believe in God or a higher power, while 41% say they do not.
ā¦the public does not share scientistsā certainty about evolution. While 87% of scientists say that life evolved over time due to natural processes, only 32% of the public believes this to be true, according to a different Pew poll earlier this year.
[As for Darwin himself, the] concluding sentence of āOrigin of Speciesā speaks of a āCreatorā breathing life āinto a few forms or into one.ā
What do scientists think about religion? - Los Angeles Times
Is that what the Darwinist fanatics so afraid of??
5. Hereās an interesting point from Dennis Prager:
āIn my lifetime alone, science went from positing a universe that always existed to positing a universe that had a beginning (the Big Bang). So, in just one generation [the Bible], in describing a beginning to the universe, went from conflicting with science to agreeing with scienceā¦.[The Bible] should not violate essential truths (for example, it accurately depicts human beings as the last creation).ā
And thatās not the only corresponding point between modern science and a belief in Godā¦.
And the Darwinists cannot abide by it.
Last edited: