His discussion over the lack of ice in north Alaska vs that at Greenland makes sense.
I recall the severe cold in Europe in the winter of 1962. I then was there and kept hearing it was record colds. I recall super deep Snows in the Sierras around 1945 too. And this past Winter was very very severe. So do you blame that on climate change?
No, it doesn't, as I pointed out the lack of precipitation in north Alaska compared to Greenland. He refused to address that point, which everyone correctly took as his surrender.
And the gist of my claim is that conspiracy babbling like that makes it impossible to take you seriously. There's zero evidence to back up such a crazy claim, yet you make it anyways, entirely because a political party told you to make it.
I believe the enormous waste of time is trying to accomodate the alarmists. And if one wants to prepare, for such as hurricanes and floods, then construct for that reason. Take the wildfire at maui recently. Those homes were poorly built. I know a bit about home building in Hawaii primarily due to my being a former RE Broker and appraiser of long term experience. I have a stepson who builds fancy homes in Hawaii. And he builds them right. My daughter has a home and condo at Kauai. She says the home is maybe 100 years old. So the construction is not current. The Condo however is very up to date and pretty new construction. Those homes were like raw meat to a lion. Some homes that did not burn at Maui were modern built. Anyway, my day is not here to waste my time on alarmism. I am more the optimist.
You are the fraud, not me. You pretend to be the expert, not me. You’re science illiterate just by the comments you make and you don’t even know it. We have hundreds of climate research facilities and websites. You NEVER REFER TO THEM. That makes you a fraud.
Here is the actual comparison of precipitation of Alaska vs Greenland. Alaska has much more precipitation.
www.worlddata.info
That shit you toss is landing only on you. The wind keeps it headed at you. The wind of your own chatter.
The scientific method is a system practiced at research facilities. But you use bogus referrals from individualsvn, who are not and never are the institutions that provide the very BEST SCIENCE in the world. You are science illiterate.
See, more bullshit. You contribute nothing that makes any sense. You have a Fking question, address it to a climate science research facility. Naw, frauds like you can’t do it.
There is no evidence you are science literate. I would say the work in this group is plenty informative.
Men like you have a fatal weakness. The need to seem super important. But all I do is rely on the actual science. And it pisses you off.
You’re a pilot and I’m an astronaut. Sure, likely story. So you fly a kite.
Obviously I am. I refer you climate research facilities, you refer to, wtf knows.
Bet your ass I’m more important then you when it comes to climate change. I trust and support the work of the world wide science community, you make up shit.
Not really. In the community of people i refer to, I’m definitely not. But Geesus, you live in a world of made up shit and make believe. You hang with science illiterates.
If you actually read a science text you wouldn’t be making so many dumb statements…actual science ? Is that the one that refers to “ air” and CO2 as separate entities ? You’re hilarious.
You know why you are such a fuck-off? Because of your piss poor attitude. I never make dumb statements. Air is nitrogen and Oxygen. Try to breathe in CO2 if you plan to die.
8 pages of gaslighting bullsh*t....~S~
