"Interglacials" are 100% refuted by ice cores

[EMH]

CO2 FRAUD is 100% about getting science invalids to believe planet Earth warms and cools as a whole. That conclusion was completely blown out of the water by the fact that Greenland froze while North America thawed during the past 1 million years.

The "interglacial" is part of CO2 FRAUD's attempt to mislead on that issue.

Google Search

The last interglacial period, also known as the Eemian, lasted from approximately 130,000 to 115,000 years ago.



LOL!!!!


OK, and an interglacial is....

"An interglacial period is a warm phase in Earth's climate history that occurs between colder glacial periods. During these times, ice sheets and glaciers retreat, global temperatures rise, and ecosystems shift. "

so we are led to believe that "the ice sheets retreated" during 130k to 115k years ago on Earth.

DID THAT ACTUALLY HAPPEN?

NO!!

This is what we have...

Antarctica has grown a new layer of ice every year for the past 2 million years at least, proven by the ice core. That's 90% of Earth ice growing straight through the "interglacial"

"Antarctic ice cores are cylinders of ice drilled from the continent's ice sheet, providing a record of past climate stretching back up to 2 million years. They act as "time machines" that trap ancient air bubbles."

Greenland 7% of Earth ice...

"Cores from the Greenland Ice Sheet are reported to preserve around 130,000 years of climate history" and that's not even halfway down... so Greenland GREW A NEW LAYER OF ICE EVERY YEAR during the bullshit "interglacial" too...



Interglacials are CO2 FRAUD bullshit, and easily outed as such. When a poster uses the term "interglacial" just link this topic.


Ice ages are continent specific, and Greenland froze while North America thawed, completely disproving

1. CO2 FRAUD
2. interglacials
3. the CO2 FRAUD definition of ice age, which hasn't changed even after we discovered tectonic plate movement...

Thread 'How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?'

May 15, 2023

This is where the climate debate is now stuck.

Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today.

Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very "Dennis Quaid" approach to ice ages - they are lightning fast, quick, and agile. They come and go really fast.

Since 2010, Milankovitch has replaced "North American Ice Age" with the claim that the ice on Chicago recently that was 2.5 miles thick was only 75k years old.

Really....

My side, which is...

• EMH
• Replies: 134
• Forum: Environment

• 

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

 

[ReinyDays]

Then how do you explain the scablands of Washington Provence State ...

 

[EMH]

Then how do you explain the scablands of Washington Provence State ...

NORTH AMERICAN ICE AGE ended when North America moved beyond 600 miles from the North Pole. The only thing left is Ellesmere island, now 0.3% of Earth ice and dropping.


Your definition of "ice age" is wrong...

Thread 'Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...'

Jun 23, 2023

What is an ICE AGE?

Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice retreats, as if "Day After Tomorrow" movie is accurate... LOL!!! What was North American Ice Age before 2010 is now spun into a series of rapid "ice ages" where it took a mere 75k years for the "ice age" to start in Northern Canada and put 2.5 mile thick glaicers on Chicago. This is "Milankovich"...

• EMH
• Replies: 448
• Forum: Environment

• 
• 
• 

 

[EMH]

Apparently we have people here who cannot refute one word of the OP, yet are still pushing "interglacials."


Y'all are completely refuted. "Blocking" EMH doesn't change that truth.

 

[EMH]

Too many here trying to use the fraud term "interglacial"

 

[Old Rocks]

Apparently we have people here who cannot refute one word of the OP, yet are still pushing "interglacials."


Y'all are completely refuted. "Blocking" EMH doesn't change that truth.

Oh, I would never block EMH, after all, every once in a while I need to be reminded you just can't fix stupid. LOL

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Oh, I would never block EMH, after all, every once in a while I need to be reminded you just can't fix stupid. LOL

True.

His only redeeming feature is that he doesn't want to waste hundreds of trillions on green energy.

Of course, he'll be dead for weeks before they discover him.

And his 12 cats won't have left much to bury.

 

[EMH]

^^^

If they could refute, they would...

they can't, and they know it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

^^^

If you had any evidence, you'd post it.

You don't, and you know it.

 

[EMH]

^^^

If you had any evidence, you'd post it.

You don't, and you know it.

ice cores are evidence, unless Mossad says otherwise....???

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

ice cores are evidence, unless Mossad says otherwise....???

Which ice cores prove your 30-million-year NA Ice Age?

 

[EMH]

Which ice cores prove your 30-million-year NA Ice Age?

This topic is about "interglacials."

Of course, even you might not attempt to go there, since during the "current interglacial that began 21000 years ago" both Greenland and AA, 97% of Earth's ice, have grown new ice layers EVERY YEAR....


so you try to make it about North American Ice Age, and you were already slaughtered in that debate too...

Thread 'How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?'

May 15, 2023

This is where the climate debate is now stuck.

Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today.

Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very "Dennis Quaid" approach to ice ages - they are lightning fast, quick, and agile. They come and go really fast.

Since 2010, Milankovitch has replaced "North American Ice Age" with the claim that the ice on Chicago recently that was 2.5 miles thick was only 75k years old.

Really....

My side, which is...

• EMH
• Replies: 134
• Forum: Environment

• 

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

This topic is about "interglacials."

Of course, even you might not attempt to go there, since during the "current interglacial that began 21000 years ago" both Greenland and AA, 97% of Earth's ice, have grown new ice layers EVERY YEAR....


so you try to make it about North American Ice Age, and you were already slaughtered in that debate too...

Thread 'How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?'

May 15, 2023

This is where the climate debate is now stuck.

Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today.

Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very "Dennis Quaid" approach to ice ages - they are lightning fast, quick, and agile. They come and go really fast.

Since 2010, Milankovitch has replaced "North American Ice Age" with the claim that the ice on Chicago recently that was 2.5 miles thick was only 75k years old.

Really....

My side, which is...

• EMH
• Replies: 134
• Forum: Environment

• 

None of the ice cores prove your 30-million-year NA Ice Age?

 

[EMH]

None of the ice cores prove your 30-million-year NA Ice Age?

False, ice cores refute the concept of McBullshit, that 2.5 mile thick ice age glacier was under 100k years old.

AA gets to 2.7 million layers before it gets a mile down, and it is 2.5 miles thick...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

False, ice cores refute the concept of McBullshit, that 2.5 mile thick ice age glacier was under 100k years old.

AA gets to 2.7 million layers before it gets a mile down, and it is 2.5 miles thick...

False, ice cores refute the concept of McBullshit, that 2.5 mile thick ice age glacier was under 100k years old.

Cool story. Post the ice core data that does that.

AA gets to 2.7 million layers before it gets a mile down, and it is 2.5 miles thick...

And you think that proves your NA glacier claim? That's so sad.

 

[EMH]

And you think that proves your NA glacier claim?

It does, actually.

Unless you want to claim that AA's ice age was somehow "different" in that regard...