leftwinger
Diamond Member
How many surrounding nations has Iran attacked ?
~S~
Many. Indirectly thru terrorism. Also Taking down full civilian airliners.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many surrounding nations has Iran attacked ?
~S~
I agree about “winning”. Not sure that paying $3.87 a gallon for gasoline is winning when they weren’t much of a threat to us though. And when the Arabs start rolling out their next wave of terrorism in response to this it will be interesting to see what remaining freedoms are taken from us (i.e. getting on airplanes without removing your shoes). You DO realize that blowback is coming our way for this, right?
Feel free to show where I've ever claimed we must be perfect all the time. My claim is that we have not been as benevolent or benign in our interventions as some like to say, not that we have to be perfect all the time.Keep pretending that we have to be perfect all the time but other countries can **** us over and we have to take it.
And when the lefties came and took over in those countries, they turned in to paradises?
What are they doing to the world right now. And if you believe they are not doing anything and haven't for the past 47 years, then you are going on the ignore list as just another antim-american POS.I'm not the one pretending that in our foreign policy of intervention, we have been benevolent angels. What did the Iranians do to us in 1953?
The history of our interventions has not been the benevolent fairytale the politicians and talking heads claim. Those claims are simply pasteurized history.
Remember "He who controls the spice, controls the world". Ops, did I say spice, I meant oil.....
The fact is, we have been FAR MORE benevolent and benign than ANY OTHER NATION on the planet.Feel free to show where I've ever claimed we must be perfect all the time. My claim is that we have not been as benevolent or benign in our interventions as some like to claim, not that we have to be perfect all the time.
This guy is quoting the OP, who called it a war himself just yesterday. Talk about a self-own. See attached.Read the post OP. We are not at war. We are standing in front of a barrel of fish with a 50 cal.![]()
And that is the "other means".
And we don't.We control the oil. We can make the price go up or down, and destroy entire economies, if we see fit.
And we don't.
We could conquer the world, but we don't.
We could just take over the economies of nations that rape us with outrageous tariffs, but we don't.
We could be the worst thing this planet has seen outside of China and the southern Asian continent, but we aren't.
We have even made economic deals with countries that were not in our best interest so that we could have a friend as a trading partner.
How have we been treated by the world?
As an ATM, yet we still do business with them.
The world has not seen as gentle a giant in its entire history.
But that does not mean we won't look out for our interests when necessary.
What people seem to fail to understand is when countries like Iran say, 'Death to America'. They are saying they intend to kill you and those people you love.
Must be the dust. LOLThat was so poignant I thought it brought a tear to my eye.
Or maybe it's just dusty in here.
If we weren't restrained, Iran would be a glass crater right now.If we were very restrained, we would have used other means, rather than going to war, against and "imminent" threat, that could not be imminent for years to come.
What's the difference?
How was the USA arming Iraq and selling them the means to make chemical and biological weapons benevolent? Other than the profits made by US and our Allies companies that is. It was certainly malevolent for Iran during the war, and then Iraq when we used the very weapons we supplied them with, as a pretext to invade. How many people were killed by that policy decision?The fact is, we have been FAR MORE benevolent and benign than ANY OTHER NATION on the planet.
Maybe the USA with a $1 Trillion military budget needs to stop looking to pick fights all over the world
Iran has been murdering US citizens for 47 years. They have been developing their missile systems, and drone warfare systems for 20 years.It is fiction, to think or act as if Iran had the capability to carry out such a war on the US, 6,300 miles away. You might as well be talking about a war with aliens that are adrift in space, on life support. Totally unreal and unnecessary for the security of the US and North American continent.
So, take the left wing filter off those actions.How was the USA arming Iraq and selling them the means to make chemical and biological weapons benevolent? Other than the profits made by US and our Allies companies that is. It was certainly malevolent for Iran during the war, and then Iraq when we used the very weapons we supplied them with, as a pretext to invade. How many people were killed by that policy decision?
True.If we weren't restrained, Iran would be a glass crater right now.
How was the USA arming Iraq and selling them the means to make chemical and biological weapons benevolent? Other than the profits made by US and our Allies companies that is. It was certainly malevolent for Iran during the war, and then Iraq when we used the very weapons we supplied them with, as a pretext to invade. How many people were killed by that policy decision?
Here is the thing that they fail to distinguish regarding this.Iran has been murdering US citizens for 47 years. They have been developing their missile systems, and drone warfare systems for 20 years.
They were developing a nuke for at least 30 years. Of they ever got it, they would have used it.
Fortunately Trump and Co. Didn't have their heads in the sand like others, hoping Iran would just go away.
If we were very restrained, we would have used other means, rather than going to war, against and "imminent" threat, that could not be imminent for years to come.