OSHA said COVID is NOT being spread in offices and concluded that a mandate is not necessary.
BIDEN TOLD OSHA TO ENFORCE A MANDATE ANYWAYS.
A court told Biden to STOP the mandate....BIDEN VIOLATED THE COURT AND TOLD PEOPLE TO KEEP GETTING VAXXED SO THEY DONT GET FIRED.
Biden needs to be impeached for OVERRULING OSHA and IGNORING A COURT ORDER.
Like Trump, Biden can speak for himself and his personal beliefs and opinions, but cannot abuse govt or office to force or enforce/impose beliefs against the consent or beliefs of others affected.
If Biden needs to be impeached for supporting people and businesses who agree and believe in mandates, then this is the equivalent of impeaching Trump for expressing his beliefs and urging people who agree the election results were not proven to protest and reject rulings and votes otherwise that violate their beliefs.
In both cases, people have the right to exercise and express their beliefs equally. We need to organize to respect the different beliefs, so these do not impose on others, but everyone has access to resources and services to accommodate their own beliefs respectively.
We already have a model for this, where peoole choose to separate funds and participation when it comes to choosing which church or which religious, private or public school to patronize.
Pandemic beliefs and preferences are the same way.
Religious schools are allowed to hire or fire staff depending if they comply with religious requirements and standards of policy and practice.
This is similar. If people and states disagree over mandates, we can all help companies and employees/employers set up separate Cooperative jobs services and benefits to accommodate those of other beliefs. We just need to organize and coordinate resources better .
We already needed to separate prochoice and prolife policies and funding to prevent clashes in beliefs from imposing on taxpayers and citizens of opposing positions and creeds.
The issues of faith based policies in public schools also require accommodating equal choice of beliefs (whether over LGBT and CRT, or Christian prayer, creation/evolution, climate change or now the political beliefs about mandates/vaccines and whether the election rules and ballots were legally proven valid before being certified etc etc)
This is nothing new.
We have long known there are two major denominational differences in political beliefs between Conservatives and Liberals.
At what point are we going to recognize these like Protestants and Catholics with equal rights to separate jurisdiction over personal differences in beliefs and biases, and quit abusing Govt to impose one denomination over another?
It is unconstitutional to establish religion.
At what point do we agree that political beliefs constitute a form of religion and faith based biases in belief?
When we can accept that, we can work smarter and manage our religious differences. If we keep insisting the other belief is wrong and those people have no rights to their beliefs, we will keep fighting through govt to impose one belief over another by majority vote or ruling.
When will we learn this does not work.
The Reformation of the church occurred when Lutherans separated from Catholic authority that was abusing monopoly to impose conflicting beliefs and theology. Luther called for people to follow the laws directly and set up their own churches where the people become the church body directly.
Here, we can empower people to become their own govt by taking back responsibility for enforcing laws.
When we do this, we become equal. And do not need to fight to control govt to impose policy on others. Like the Protestant and Catholic split, we can govern separate policies by separate Party affiliations. And still agree on Christianity while maintaining different denominations by choice of groups, schools, programs etc. to fund and follow voluntarily.
Here, once we agree to separate beliefs from govt, then the separate groups can all negotiate to keep just the general uniform policies where we all agree as the common standards and duties delegated to govt to enforce universally. And separate the rest by state or by private party or individual program without conflict.
We are the United States. We have a long colorful rich history of different religions and parties all organizing members around their own beliefs and choices of programs. We have States that democratically manage their own local populations under elected reps and voted on rules and judges for rulings. We have religious groups and nonprofits that set up private schools and hospitals as well as foster and family programs, whether prochoice or prolife, or Christian or secular
Why not do the same development with political Parties that already organize members of like beliefs per Precinct and Electoral Districts?
We can do this. We already want to be separate and free from people and policies from opposing party beliefs.
We just need the same Lutheran movement and moment to click and unite in our hearts and minds to see we can do this together, instead of fighting.
Instead of a nasty divorce, we can agree civilly to separate finances and households, so we can more effectively work together to manage household members, respectively without conflict, and share responsibility where we agree, and to separate jurisdiction where we disagree.
