The Ukraine invasion shows the absolute failure of globalism

Seymour Flops

Diamond Member
Nov 25, 2021
16,355
13,278
2,288
Texas
One country, with one dictator is acting on its own against another country. Is that country being helped by globalism? Nope.

Because of globalism, our globalist president decided we don't need energy from our own producers or from our closest trading partner. No, we need to put Americans out of work so we can help Putin be the energy king of the world.

Because of globalism, the U.S. cannot act unilaterally to help Ukraine. Any action on our part would be interpreted as action by NATO, giving Putin an excuse to attack one of our NATO protectorates . . . sorry, partners.

Plus, the ladies of the view can't have their European vacation.
 
Last edited:
One country, with one dictator is acting on its own against another country. Is that country being helped by globalism? Nope.

Because of globalism, our globalist president decided we don't need energy from our own producers or from our closes trading partner. No, we need to put Americans out of work so we can help Putin be the energy king of the world.

Because of globalism, the U.S. cannot act unilaterally to help Ukraine. Any action on our part would be interpreted as action by NATO, giving Putin and excuse to attack one of our NATO protectorates . . . sorry, partners.

Plus, the ladies of the view can't have their European vacation.
The EIA projects that the US, which is the world's largest oil producer, will fill 12 million barrels per day in 2022 and 12.6 million per day in 2023.Feb 17, 2022

The US is projected to increase oil production in 2022 and 2023​


 
One country, with one dictator is acting on its own against another country. Is that country being helped by globalism? Nope.

Because of globalism, our globalist president decided we don't need energy from our own producers or from our closest trading partner. No, we need to put Americans out of work so we can help Putin be the energy king of the world.

Because of globalism, the U.S. cannot act unilaterally to help Ukraine. Any action on our part would be interpreted as action by NATO, giving Putin an excuse to attack one of our NATO protectorates . . . sorry, partners.

Plus, the ladies of the view can't have their European vacation.
Ladies are mentioned in Sengupta's video, but it's the U.S. who uses females in its propaganda as mentioned in the video. We doubt there will be up to 3 USMBers that have the intelligence to set through Sengupta's entire explanation, let alone pass a pop-quiz on the material, though Sengupta is politically correct:

Amit Sengupta, Russia-Ukraine Conflict/ Crisis Explained/Everything in Detail/ Geopolitics
You stupid fucking retard, clearly you do not own a car, and you never will either!
One should not own a car anyway, even if the Ozark Podunk is retarded. Go electric with solar recharge whenever possible.
 
The EIA projects that the US, which is the world's largest oil producer, will fill 12 million barrels per day in 2022 and 12.6 million per day in 2023.Feb 17, 2022

The US is projected to increase oil production in 2022 and 2023

From the link that you posted:

On Wednesday, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) looked into their crystal ball to forecast US crude oil production.

The EIA projects that the US, which is the world’s largest oil producer, will fill 12 million barrels per day in 2022 and 12.6 million per day in 2023. For context, the US produced 11.2 million barrels of oil per day in 2021. Most of this increased production would come from the southwest, the magical land of the Permian Basin.

What does this mean for you at the pump? Shouldn’t this tip the scales in favor of lower fuel and energy prices?

Unfortunately, the EIA says decreased oil prices are likely not in the cards. If anything, the reason oil production would increase is largely because of sustained high oil prices.

To complicate things more, oil prices aren’t simply based on supply and demand. There’s also how much of the stuff is available to drill (the reserves), how quickly it can be refined, how much buffer there is in existing inventories (right now there isn’t much), and, of course, the politics surrounding it all.

US tensions with Russia, which is the third-highest producer of oil globally, have already impacted the price of oil here, pushing it to $94 per barrel, the highest level since 2014. If that climbs to $110, it could potentially push inflation to 10%.


Not such a rosy picture coming from their crystal balls, eh? Not that I would ever question the veracity of a website controlled by the Biden administration.

According to this graph on the same website:


Oil production was greater in the U.S. in 2020, and 2019, than in 2021.

1645838804508.png


I wonder what changed?
 
NATO set Ukraine up to be invaded by excluding them from the group. That's how groups who exclude work. It's middle-school psychology as applied to international relations.

NATO turned out to be not an organization that deterred Russian aggress, but rather a group of military powers that the Russians could be confident would not lift a finger in the face of its aggression against a non-member of that organization.
 
One country, with one dictator is acting on its own against another country. Is that country being helped by globalism? Nope.

Because of globalism, our globalist president decided we don't need energy from our own producers or from our closest trading partner. No, we need to put Americans out of work so we can help Putin be the energy king of the world.

Because of globalism, the U.S. cannot act unilaterally to help Ukraine. Any action on our part would be interpreted as action by NATO, giving Putin an excuse to attack one of our NATO protectorates . . . sorry, partners.

Plus, the ladies of the view can't have their European vacation.
You are reading WAAAAAY too fucking much into this.
 
Globalism is the inevitable outcome of any capitalistic society.
 

Forum List

Back
Top