The truth has a way of coming out in the end.

what landslide?
Get out of our way. Change up. The Republican elected and non-elected RINOS are forewarned also. Trump is not an extreme conservative. Some parts of his administration are conservative. Most of this is to try to cleanup a corrupted nation. Which buys us time to remain top dog in the world.
 
“I now understand that the surveillance videos used in the film were characterized on the basis of inaccurate information provided to me and my team. If I had known then that the videos were not linked to geolocation data, I would have clarified this and produced and edited the film differently,” he added.

D’Souza’s note apologized to Mark Andrews, a Georgia man recorded on video footage that was used in the movie with his face blurred.

Salem Media Group, which published the book and distributed the film version, previously apologized to Andrews and said the company would no longer distribute the book or film.

Georgia law enforcement agencies previously debunked the film’s allegations but the right-wing provocateurs—led by prominent figures like Trump—have touted the allegations and similar conspiracies for years.

D’Souza was later pardoned by Trump in 2018, reflecting Trump’s habit of delivering politically for figures who have lavished him with praise—similar to the FBI director nomination he recently offered to Trump fanfic writer Kash Patel.

The D’Souza saga is a microcosm of the right-wing media world and conservative culture in general, where utterly false and easily debunked claims are promoted for years on end, only to quietly be cast off when people are no longer paying attention.


Hope this guy has more than memorabilia when the law suits come down.
Meanwhile, Joe and the FBI labeled Hunter's laptop as Russian disinformation, only later to admit it was legit.

After the election, about 20% of voters said had they known the scandal was legit or that it even existed, they would not have voted for Biden.

Clearly election interference.

But only one side is held to account?

Yep.
 
That's not what D'Sousa said.
Yeah, actually it is what Dinesh wrote.

I posted a link (post #29,) to it four or five hours before you made an ass of yourself by what you posted.

Oddball has debunked your bullshit several times in this thread.

You are just making yourself look like a fool when anyone that reads this thread can read D'Sousa's blog post for themselves.


D'Souza was pardoned AFTER he had served his prison sentence. The "apology" applies to about 15 seconds of video in a two hour program that was substantially factual.


This is how the entire "fact-checking," industry works. So-called "experts," take one thing wrong, or slightly inaccurate with a claim, and then say that the entire thing is false.


. . . I would have thought that the establishment would get wise to the this situation, (especially after that stunning electoral loss,) that due to the Streisand effect, these so called "fact-checks," usually have the opposite affect. They serve to make folks look more closely at information the establishment would rather have the population ignore.

That whole NYT supposed "fact-check," of RFKjr's claim about Fruit Loops? A perfect example.




NYT dragged for hilariously botched ‘fact check’ of RFK Jr.’s war on artificial ingredients​



 
The paid clickbait agitprop must get through at all costs!
9cg626.gif
 
D'Souza was pardoned AFTER he had served his prison sentence. The "apology" applies to about 15 seconds of video in a two hour program that was substantially factual.
So..........the Repub election officials who essentially called the film horseshit were wrong?

FACT FOCUS: Gaping holes in the claim of 2K ballot ‘mules’​


You folks are too invested in the myth of determinate fraud to admit to the truth. trump lost.
 
Not the 2004 election.
2004 they stole Ohio. Probably Diebold stole Florida too, but Bush was going to lose Ohio and the election in 2004. The owner of Diebold was in charge of the "re elect Bush 2004 Ohio" campaign. Oh come on now. Couldn't be more obvious.

Dominion is not a corrupt company. Diebold was for sure. Why do you think Trump is paranoid of electronic voting machines? He knows Gore got screwed in 2000 and Kerry in 2004. Remember Trump was a Democrat back then also saying Bush lied us into Iraq. Then suddenly he got the idea to run as a Republican and suddenly, Barrack was born in Kenya.
 
People still don't realize 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen. Everything Trump worried happened to him happened to Gore then Kerry in 2000 and 2004.

And then there's Bush lying us into Iraq. Even Trump said it, in 2008 and again in 2016. Republicans voted for Trump. But still Republicans, and a lot of people who are not Republicans, still to this day don't believe Bush would do such a thing.

“When she first got in and was named speaker, I met her. And I’m very impressed by her. I think she’s a very impressive person. I like her a lot. But I was surprised that she didn’t do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush. It was almost – it just seemed like she was going to really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which personally I think would’ve been a wonderful thing,” Trump told Blitzer in the interview.

“Impeaching him?” Blitzer asked.

“Absolutely. For the war. For the war,” said Trump, referring to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. “Well, he lied. He got us into the war with lies, and I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant and they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And yet Bush got us into this horrible war with lies. By lying. By saying they had weapons of mass destruction. By saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true.”

Asked about the remarks during a presidential debate eight years later, Trump said, “you do whatever you want – you call it whatever you want,” and reiterated his belief that the Bush administration lied.

You still believe pregnant and dimpled chads are real.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAAAAAAAA!
 
2004 they stole Ohio. Probably Diebold stole Florida too, but Bush was going to lose Ohio and the election in 2004. The owner of Diebold was in charge of the "re elect Bush 2004 Ohio" campaign. Oh come on now. Couldn't be more obvious.

Dominion is not a corrupt company. Diebold was for sure. Why do you think Trump is paranoid of electronic voting machines? He knows Gore got screwed in 2000 and Kerry in 2004. Remember Trump was a Democrat back then also saying Bush lied us into Iraq. Then suddenly he got the idea to run as a Republican and suddenly, Barrack was born in Kenya.

Meanwhile they’re still counting ballots in California.
 
You still believe pregnant and dimpled chads are real.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAAAAAAAA!

What's not to believe? Whites in charge of the votes in black areas threw out any votes that had hanging chads. This was just one way they rigged Florida. One of many. Diebold Voting Machine were rigged. Look up all the shady shit that forced them to sell the company. Not like Dominion. I know the owners in Canada. Millionaires now. My ex girlfriend made the right decision dumping my ass and marrying that boy.

Trump made false claims about Dominion on Fox News based on what he knew about Diebold 2000 and 2004. Remember, he was a Democrat then.

Fox and Dominion Voting Systems have reached a $787 million settlement in the voting machine company's defamation lawsuit.

Trump just assumed Dominion was shady too and Fox was dumb enough to let him on to slander them on national tv.
 
Dominion is not a corrupt company. Diebold was for sure.
They are essentially the same folks.


. . . . well, except the Democrats seized Diebold, and put their people in charge of the operation.

www.dominionvoting.com:80/images/pdfs/DominionAcquiresPremierReleaseFinal4.pdf
Someone removed the evidence from the archives. . . .

825156
". . . ES&S must sell the divestiture assets to a buyer approved by the department. The settlement prohibits ES&S from bidding on new voting equipment system contracts using the Premier equipment. The department also required that ES&S grant the divestiture buyer an opportunity to compete to provide services to Premier customers currently under contract with ES&S, giving customers the option to switch to the divestiture buyer or to remain with ES&S.. . . "

There's the proof, right from the government, requiring the permission of the Obama DoJ, to whom ES&S can sell it's assets too. . .



Not to worry, saved the assets sale proof here;


825159


And the corruption? From MSM anyone could have followed that for themselves, LA Times and HuffPo. . .

Whistle-Blower or Thief in Diebold Case?​


'They think they are above the law': the firms that own America's voting system​


These same questions asked by PBS itself, of Dominion, in Georgia itself. . . :rolleyes:

One week before the election, PBS does a deep dive on Georgia's use of Dominion Voting Systems​



So. . . the question should NOT be;

Why do you think Trump is paranoid of electronic voting machines?



The question really should be, when did partisan folks, who don't pay attention to government documents and our own media, decide this;

iu


And this;

7y4iok.gif




Is a substitution for paying attention to what the media reports, and the government tells us, about what is going on in the world, and using a little critical thinking, instead of name calling and constructing strawmen fallacies to attack folks that do use logic and critical thinking?

:eusa_think:
 
Last edited:
What's not to believe? Whites in charge of the votes in black areas threw out any votes that had hanging chads. This was just one way they rigged Florida. One of many. Diebold Voting Machine were rigged. Look up all the shady shit that forced them to sell the company. Not like Dominion. I know the owners in Canada. Millionaires now. My ex girlfriend made the right decision dumping my ass and marrying that boy.

Trump made false claims about Dominion on Fox News based on what he knew about Diebold 2000 and 2004. Remember, he was a Democrat then.

Fox and Dominion Voting Systems have reached a $787 million settlement in the voting machine company's defamation lawsuit.

Trump just assumed Dominion was shady too and Fox was dumb enough to let him on to slander them on national tv.

Pregnant chads are racist!
You crack me up.
 
They are essentially the same folks.


. . . . well, except the Democrats seized Diebold, and put their people in charge of the operation.


Someone removed the evidence from the archives. . . .

825156
". . . ES&S must sell the divestiture assets to a buyer approved by the department. The settlement prohibits ES&S from bidding on new voting equipment system contracts using the Premier equipment. The department also required that ES&S grant the divestiture buyer an opportunity to compete to provide services to Premier customers currently under contract with ES&S, giving customers the option to switch to the divestiture buyer or to remain with ES&S.. . . "

There's the proof, right from the government, requiring the permission of the Obama DoJ, to whom ES&S can sell it's assets too. . .



Not to worry, saved the assets sale proof here;


825159


And the corruption? From MSM anyone could have followed that for themselves, LA Times and HuffPo. . .

Whistle-Blower or Thief in Diebold Case?​


'They think they are above the law': the firms that own America's voting system​


These same questions asked by PBS itself, of Dominion, in Georgia itself. . . :rolleyes:

One week before the election, PBS does a deep dive on Georgia's use of Dominion Voting Systems​



So. . . the question should NOT be;





The question really should be, when did partisan folks, who don't pay attention to government documents and our own media, decide this;

iu


And this;

7y4iok.gif


Is a substitution for paying attention to what the media reports, and the government tells us, about what is going on in the world, and using a little critical thinking, instead of name calling and constructing strawmen fallacies to attack folks that do use logic and critical thinking?

:eusa_think:

You said they are essentially the same folks. Only back then THEY fucked Al Gore. Today you claim, without any proof, that THEY are now fucking Trump.

Oh so now Al Gore and Bush are on the same team vs Trump and you? I see how this works. In other words, you agree 2000 and 2004 were rigged but so was 2020. But 16 and 24 weren't. Got it.
 
Oh so now Al Gore and Bush are on the same team vs Trump and you?
Yes, Al Gore and Bush are essentially on the same side. . . they are tools of the deep state.


. . . as far as Trump goes? meh, that remains to be seen.


And me? I am not on either side, they all suck.

None of them give a shit about honestly and integrity TBH.


Trump has continually stated that the only way to go is paper ballots counted by hand.

What do you want to bet, he won't give the issue a second thought now that he is in charge?


Hell, his DoJ KNEW about this problem, but REFUSED to prosecute when it was revealed in Florida. The person in charge of that case? Debbie Wasserman-Shultz's brother.

. . . so either Trump didn't know, wasn't paying attention, or found it a better narrative to let them keep on cheating so he had a strategy to stay in the news. . . .

Who was in charge of the Brenda Snipes case? Steven Wasserman. The same guy that buried the Seth Rich case.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s Brother Steven Wasserman Accused of Burying Seth Rich Case​



Do you even know about the Snipes case? I'm willing to bet you don't.


The thing is? It wasn't a belief, it is was a documented fact that Trump probably knew about. . but did nothing about. . .
His DoJ certainly did, they declined to prosecute this type of voting fraud. . . they certainly knew it was possible. And only four or five counties eventually swayed the country for Biden, so it isn't like it is beyond the realm of possibility.

Debbie Wassermann-Schultz is still in congress, and a beneficiary of this self-same corruption.

"Did you watch that interview? :dunno: (Bookmarked Tim Canova interview, just hit play.)

CN LIVE! S1E17 DNC Corruption: Tim Canova, Niko House & The Becks​



What baffles me, is this corruption, reached all the way up to the federal level, while Trump was still in office? IMO he should have known, long before the 2020 election. SO? :eusa_think:

It begs the question, if he knew? Why did he not do something to stop it before it was potentially deployed against him? :dunno:



Did The Department Of Justice Protect Brenda Snipes From Prosecution For Ballot Destruction?​

" . . . Disobedient Media spoke with Tim Canova, who told us:


A Floridian official set to prosecute Snipes was also said to have backed down after a trip to Washington DC, which involved meetings with the DOJ. Canova stated:

Canova’s contention that US Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein may have been responsible for preventing legal consequences for Brenda Snipes is profoundly concerning. Last year, Rosenstein faced heavy criticism in the wake of the publication of the infamous FISA Memo. . . . "
"
"Anyway, Debie-Wasserman-Schultz had a relative in the DOJ, pulled some strings, and the corruption continues. It matters not which party you are in, they are all the same. (These folks were against the regular DNC, they were Justice Democrats. . . so, make of that what you will. If it hadn't been for the Wassermans, I would have thought Trump's folks wouldn't let that ride.)

Did The Department Of Justice Protect Brenda Snipes From Prosecution For Ballot Destruction?
Zerohedge
http://web.archive.org/web/20190208015705/https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-07/did-department-justice-protect-brenda-snipes-prosecution-ballot-destruction
http://web.archive.org/web/20190213051041/https://disobedientmedia.com/2019/02/did-the-department-of-justice-protect-brenda-snipes-from-prosecution-for-ballot-destruction/


But let's face it. . . you don't give a shit about the truth, just power and partisan politics.
 
But 16 and 24 weren't.

IMO? There were many presidential elections that were not above board between '00 and now.
No proof 16 and 24 were any more legit than many of them.



The primary agenda of the Deep State, is to strip American's guaranteed civil rights and civil liberties as guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.

The first time? Was to launch a phony "war on terror," the second? The phony scamdemic.

They will do what ever it takes to push these agendas forward.

It would not surprise me one bit that they let Trump, or helped him win, b/c the new agenda is digital IDs, social credit and forced use of electronic money.

. . and the purposely manufactured "illegal alien invasion?" Fits that need perfectly. Did you read that last immigration bill? If they don't change it, it will force use of digital IDs.

Hell, most conservatives on this site are chomping at the bit to have daddy government require folks to use digital IDs so they can track illegal employment. The upshot? They could then require digital ID to use the internet.

How to Get Your Tax Cattle to LOVE Digital ID​

A Guide for Left- or Right-wing Authoritarians​

https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F6c33c1e6-a092-445b-903e-99e10eb1c342_1280x720.jpeg


". . . First the digital ID.

Then the digital currency.

Then a war or scamdemic or alien invasion or other emergency (yet to be decided).

Then: BAM! We have them!

Imagine. Everyone tracked everywhere they go! No one allowed to buy or sell without the digital ID chip in their hand or forehead! Every would-be resister identified and rounded up at a moment's notice!

Genetic manipulation of the species? Enforced brain chips? Carbon rationing? 15-minute cities? The end of free speech? The end of humanity itself? With our digital ID control grid in place, the sky's the limit!

There's just one pesky problem. It seems the tax cattle are wary of the digital ID system. It seems it may take some doing to convince them of the benefits of being tracked, traced, surveilled, monitored, databased, regulated, allowed, disallowed, measured, mandated, restricted, cajoled, punished and reduced every moment of every day for the rest of their miserable little lives.

But let's not worry about that. As you know, we have managed to get the tax cattle to sort themselves into two opposed groups: those who identify as "left-wing" and those who identify as "right-wing." (Or, in the modern parlance, "libtards" and "fascists.") It should be simple enough, therefore, to employ our usual psychological warfare tactics to create propaganda specifically tailored to appeal to each side's sensibilities and lead them down the digital ID cattle chute toward the slaughterhouse.

I present to you, then, our ultra-secret guide to How To Get Your Tax Cattle to LOVE Digital ID: A Guide for Left- or Right-wing Authoritarians. . . "
 
Back
Top Bottom