The truth has a way of coming out in the end.

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
24,101
Reaction score
20,106
Points
2,320
Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ā€˜2000 Mulesā€™ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh Dā€™Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film ā€œ2000 Mulesā€ poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentaryā€™s writer and director, Dinesh Dā€™Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. Dā€™Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of ā€œmulesā€ illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The filmā€™s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

ā€œWe recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,ā€ Mr. Dā€™Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.


Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.
 
Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ā€˜2000 Mulesā€™ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh Dā€™Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film ā€œ2000 Mulesā€ poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentaryā€™s writer and director, Dinesh Dā€™Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. Dā€™Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of ā€œmulesā€ illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The filmā€™s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

ā€œWe recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,ā€ Mr. Dā€™Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.


Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.
šŸ„±

Boring screed ^ is boring.
 
Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ā€˜2000 Mulesā€™ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh Dā€™Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film ā€œ2000 Mulesā€ poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentaryā€™s writer and director, Dinesh Dā€™Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. Dā€™Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of ā€œmulesā€ illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The filmā€™s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

ā€œWe recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,ā€ Mr. Dā€™Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.


Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.
The truth with Progs does not exist. You are the devil's minions. You show yourselves as so nice and honorable as a front. And behind the scenes are so different. It is you who are in charge. It you who are in control. You continuously use your agendas to destroy people who are not Progs. You use the D.C. Internal Security Force to smear, emasculate and exterminate if necessary. many state and local Security Forces do the same. And Republican areas have some of it also.
 
Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ā€˜2000 Mulesā€™ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh Dā€™Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film ā€œ2000 Mulesā€ poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentaryā€™s writer and director, Dinesh Dā€™Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. Dā€™Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of ā€œmulesā€ illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The filmā€™s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

ā€œWe recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,ā€ Mr. Dā€™Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.


Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.
Indian-Giver

The Hindu dindu is a toxic influencer. He's trying to seduce MAGA into going to ridiculous extremes. He is a saboteur, sucking up to the Rightists' Deep State, which has a mortal fear of Populism.
 
The truth with Progs does not exist.
Despite taking the posture of coming out of the gate swinging in response to revelations those of us on the Left knew to be true all along, you missed the mark.
As time passes the case for outcome determinate voter fraud only gets weaker. If you find that uncomfortable, so be it.
 
Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ā€˜2000 Mulesā€™ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh Dā€™Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film ā€œ2000 Mulesā€ poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentaryā€™s writer and director, Dinesh Dā€™Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. Dā€™Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of ā€œmulesā€ illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The filmā€™s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

ā€œWe recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,ā€ Mr. Dā€™Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.


Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.

Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ā€˜2000 Mulesā€™ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh Dā€™Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film ā€œ2000 Mulesā€ poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentaryā€™s writer and director, Dinesh Dā€™Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. Dā€™Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of ā€œmulesā€ illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The filmā€™s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

ā€œWe recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,ā€ Mr. Dā€™Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.


Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.

People still don't realize 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen. Everything Trump worried happened to him happened to Gore then Kerry in 2000 and 2004.

And then there's Bush lying us into Iraq. Even Trump said it, in 2008 and again in 2016. Republicans voted for Trump. But still Republicans, and a lot of people who are not Republicans, still to this day don't believe Bush would do such a thing.

ā€œWhen she first got in and was named speaker, I met her. And Iā€™m very impressed by her. I think sheā€™s a very impressive person. I like her a lot. But I was surprised that she didnā€™t do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush. It was almost ā€“ it just seemed like she was going to really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which personally I think wouldā€™ve been a wonderful thing,ā€ Trump told Blitzer in the interview.

ā€œImpeaching him?ā€ Blitzer asked.

ā€œAbsolutely. For the war. For the war,ā€ said Trump, referring to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. ā€œWell, he lied. He got us into the war with lies, and I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant and they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And yet Bush got us into this horrible war with lies. By lying. By saying they had weapons of mass destruction. By saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true.ā€

Asked about the remarks during a presidential debate eight years later, Trump said, ā€œyou do whatever you want ā€“ you call it whatever you want,ā€ and reiterated his belief that the Bush administration lied.
 
Good idea. I donā€™t. Yet. But maybe we all should.
.

Great idea.

I was just thinking what a cool place this would be if we had all the leftists on iggy and could finally have constructive conversation without all their screeching and whining like six year old girls.


.
 
.

Great idea.

I was just thinking what a cool place this would be if we had all the leftists on iggy and could finally have constructive conversation without all their screeching and whining like six year old girls.


.
I'm sure you mentally soft mother fuckers would prefer a safe space were reality and facts couldn't penetrate your make believe. :lol: :itsok:
 
.

Great idea.

I was just thinking what a cool place this would be if we had all the leftists on iggy and could finally have constructive conversation without all their screeching and whining like six year old girls.


.
They would accuse us of wanting an echo chamber.

Meanwhile, their ceaseless demands for censorship shows us that what they want is an echo chamber and absolute unanimous thinking. They like their echo chambers.
 
Back
Top Bottom