The truth has a way of coming out in the end.

[CrusaderFrank]

2000 Mules was simply every stolen election conspiracy rolled into one.

So you're saying Biden actually got 81,2OL,LOL real votes from living people?

 

[d0gbreath]

So you're saying Biden actually got 81,2OL,LOL real votes from living people?

Yes, he did.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yes, he did.

And millions of them are racist AND Misogynist for not "Voting" for Kamala?

 

[d0gbreath]

And millions of them are racist AND Misogynist for not "Voting" for Kamala?

Possibly, I don't really know.

 

[whitehall]

Being small minded used to be a cliche but the desperate losers on the left prove that it's true. In light of all the things that are going on in the world they are hysterical about a D'Souza documentary.

 

[sealybobo]

Yes, Al Gore and Bush are essentially on the same side. . . they are tools of the deep state.


. . . as far as Trump goes? meh, that remains to be seen.


And me? I am not on either side, they all suck.

None of them give a shit about honestly and integrity TBH.


Trump has continually stated that the only way to go is paper ballots counted by hand.

What do you want to bet, he won't give the issue a second thought now that he is in charge?


Hell, his DoJ KNEW about this problem, but REFUSED to prosecute when it was revealed in Florida. The person in charge of that case? Debbie Wasserman-Shultz's brother.

. . . so either Trump didn't know, wasn't paying attention, or found it a better narrative to let them keep on cheating so he had a strategy to stay in the news. . . .

Who was in charge of the Brenda Snipes case? Steven Wasserman. The same guy that buried the Seth Rich case.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s Brother Steven Wasserman Accused of Burying Seth Rich Case​

Debbie Wasserman Schultz's Brother Steven Wasserman Accused of Burying Seth Rich Case | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Guest post by Joe Hoft Former Head of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, lost her position during the DNC Convention due to WikiLeaks emails being released that showed her efforts to enable Hillary Clinton to win the DNC nomination and steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders. Now Wasserman...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Do you even know about the Snipes case? I'm willing to bet you don't.


The thing is? It wasn't a belief, it is was a documented fact that Trump probably knew about. . but did nothing about. . .
His DoJ certainly did, they declined to prosecute this type of voting fraud. . . they certainly knew it was possible. And only four or five counties eventually swayed the country for Biden, so it isn't like it is beyond the realm of possibility.

Debbie Wassermann-Schultz is still in congress, and a beneficiary of this self-same corruption.

"Did you watch that interview? (Bookmarked Tim Canova interview, just hit play.)

CN LIVE! S1E17 DNC Corruption: Tim Canova, Niko House & The Becks​

What baffles me, is this corruption, reached all the way up to the federal level, while Trump was still in office? IMO he should have known, long before the 2020 election. SO?

It begs the question, if he knew? Why did he not do something to stop it before it was potentially deployed against him?

Did The Department Of Justice Protect Brenda Snipes From Prosecution For Ballot Destruction?​

Did The Department Of Justice Protect Brenda Snipes From Prosecution For Ballot Destruction? – Investment Watch Blog

www.investmentwatchblog.com

" . . . Disobedient Media spoke with Tim Canova, who told us:


A Floridian official set to prosecute Snipes was also said to have backed down after a trip to Washington DC, which involved meetings with the DOJ. Canova stated:

Canova’s contention that US Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein may have been responsible for preventing legal consequences for Brenda Snipes is profoundly concerning. Last year, Rosenstein faced heavy criticism in the wake of the publication of the infamous FISA Memo. . . . ""

President Trump will Show “2000 Mules” at Pennsylvania Rally on Friday Night

Found the link. It takes a while to load up and activate, but it eventually started working. First published at 13:57 UTC on May 8th, 2022. "A new documentary film titled, 2000 Mules, is revealing the truth about what really happened in the 2020 election. “The election of 2020 haunts the...

www.usmessageboard.com

"Anyway, Debie-Wasserman-Schultz had a relative in the DOJ, pulled some strings, and the corruption continues. It matters not which party you are in, they are all the same. (These folks were against the regular DNC, they were Justice Democrats. . . so, make of that what you will. If it hadn't been for the Wassermans, I would have thought Trump's folks wouldn't let that ride.)

Did The Department Of Justice Protect Brenda Snipes From Prosecution For Ballot Destruction?
Zerohedge
http://web.archive.org/web/20190208015705/https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-07/did-department-justice-protect-brenda-snipes-prosecution-ballot-destruction
http://web.archive.org/web/20190213051041/https://disobedientmedia.com/2019/02/did-the-department-of-justice-protect-brenda-snipes-from-prosecution-for-ballot-destruction/


But let's face it. . . you don't give a shit about the truth, just power and partisan politics.

Who are her constituents? What kind of name is Schultz? German?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

You said they are essentially the same folks. Only back then THEY fucked Al Gore. Today you claim, without any proof, that THEY are now fucking Trump.

Oh so now Al Gore and Bush are on the same team vs Trump and you? I see how this works. In other words, you agree 2000 and 2004 were rigged but so was 2020. But 16 and 24 weren't. Got it.

Please post for the forum how many recounts Algore won.

 

[sealybobo]

See? Just as much proof that they stole the election from Trump as there are of all of your claims about them doing it to the DNC, isn't there?

Partisans have an amazing capacity to apply different standards to different narratives.

You guys won. You write the history.

 

[Lastamender]

Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed​

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film “2000 Mules” poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentary’s writer and director, Dinesh D’Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. D’Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of “mules” illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The film’s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

“We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,” Mr. D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

www.nytimes.com

Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.

Old news and it still does not change the fact the geo tracking showed what they claim.

 

[MisterBeale]

You guys won. You write the history.

Why do you keep bleeving I'm on someone's side?

If you are an American and love the nation, but distrust all politicians, know the government and international corporations, (AS WELL AS UNIONS,) and other political actors are all corrupt?

That is the side I am on.

 

[MisterBeale]

Who are her constituents? What kind of name is Schultz? German?

Go back and watch the video you didn't watch when you read that post.


There are all the answers you need.


BTW, Wasserman Shultz HAD been the democrat party chairman until it was revealed that Donna Brazille gave the debate questions and the DNC was hopelessly corrupt.

How do you not know all this?

Debbie Wasserman Schultz to resign as DNC chair as email scandal rocks Democrats​

Debbie Wasserman Schultz to resign as DNC chair as email scandal rocks Democrats

Bernie Sanders made renewed call for resignation after email leak which Clinton campaign blamed on Russian hackers

www.theguardian.com

DNC Chief Stepping Down in Wake of Leaked Email Scandal

Wasserman Schultz has been ousted as chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee on the eve of the party's convention.

www.nbcnews.com

Brazile: Leaking town hall topics to Clinton campaign 'mistake I will forever regret'

“Staff were harassed, morale suffered, and we lost weeks of planning," she adds.

www.politico.com

CNN cuts ties with Donna Brazile after hacked emails show she gave Clinton campaign debate questions

CNN quietly cut ties with Donna Brazile, the acting Democratic National Committee chair and a longtime contributor on the cable news network, after hacked emails published by WikiLeaks revealed that she had provided questions to the Hillary Clinton campaign in advance of a town hall and debate...

www.yahoo.com

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed​

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film “2000 Mules” poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentary’s writer and director, Dinesh D’Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. D’Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of “mules” illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The film’s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

“We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,” Mr. D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

www.nytimes.com

Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.

Repeat this Berg, and let it sink in, the truth may set you free........."Berg and all things left have lost all, I say ALL credibility." You guys suck, even the Democrats know they suck. That's the real WOKE. All else is bullshit.

 

[skews13]

I thought this thread was going to be about the Xiden Crime Family cartel.

You thought wrong.

 

[sealybobo]

Repeat this Berg, and let it sink in, the truth may set you free........."Berg and all things left have lost all, I say ALL credibility." You guys suck, even the Democrats know they suck. That's the real WOKE. All else is bullshit.

The reality is, we don't have to re define ourselves because you Republicans are going to prove us right about you.

 

[struth]

The reality is, we don't have to re define ourselves because you Republicans are going to prove us right about you.

you certainly proved yourselves right about what we all thought about you....demafacist

 

[sealybobo]

you certainly proved yourselves right about what we all thought about you....demafacist

Oh relax. Your Nazi party hasn't even taken over yet. Will you be calling me a demafascist as you fascist us?

 

[struth]

Oh relax. Your Nazi party hasn't even taken over yet. Will you be calling me a demafascist as you fascist us?

Correct, only your party has been taken over by fascism, not mine, and the country rejected you

 

[IDIOCRACY]

The reality is, we don't have to re define ourselves because you Republicans are going to prove us right about you.

Since when has that ever happened? Your kind prove to be wrong and/or losers every time, all the time. Say, speak of, how about those left governors corning 100s of millions of their citizen's money for special sessions and lawyers, to "Prepare to fight Trump in the name of Democracy, employing illegals, and uteruses"? Sound like a winning combination to you?

 

[Lesh]

The truth with Progs does not exist. You are the devil's minions. You show yourselves as so nice and honorable as a front. And behind the scenes are so different. It is you who are in charge. It you who are in control. You continuously use your agendas to destroy people who are not Progs. You use the D.C. Internal Security Force to smear, emasculate and exterminate if necessary. many state and local Security Forces do the same. And Republican areas have some of it also.

What does any of that nonsense have to do with the fact that you pushed a lie for years

 

[struth]

What does any of that nonsense have to do with the fact that you pushed a lie for years

the russian hoax or that xiden wasn’t gonna pardon hunter because he respected the rule of law?

Just curious