The truth has a way of coming out in the end.

I understand nothing will persuade trumples to give up their belief about the 2020 election. It is the touchstone from which almost all the lies surrounding Baby Donald are derived. Without it, you can't reasonably claim any of the cases thrown out of court for lack of evidence had merit
HUH? WTF?


As expected, treasonous seditious criminal Socialist Demon Rats want to promote the BASELESS narrative that the November 2020 election was "the most secured in our nation's history"


Civic minded PATRIOTS are familiar with the Atlanta Federal Court case wherein the Federal Judge found that in the 2020 election votes could be changed from one candidate to another in real time without creating any traceable evidence.

Curling v. Raffensperger, 403 F. Supp. 3d 1311 | Casetext Search + Citator

Read Curling v. Raffensperger, 403 F. Supp. 3d 1311,

Furthermore the so called "audit" conducted by the stupid fuck Ga Secretary of STate Raffensperger used PAPER BALLOTS GENERATED BY VOTING MACHINES


"In the end, Georgia lawmakers decided to ignore most expert advice, and spent $107 million on a new computerized voting system, including voting machines that print out paper ballots—the object of this week’s count"



.
 
Hell, this voting controversy plays perfectly into the Hegelian Dialectic (problem>reaction>solution,) to get folks to agree with Digital ID.

9cgive.gif
 
2004 they stole Ohio. Probably Diebold stole Florida too, but Bush was going to lose Ohio and the election in 2004. The owner of Diebold was in charge of the "re elect Bush 2004 Ohio" campaign. Oh come on now. Couldn't be more obvious.

Today you claim, without any proof, that THEY are now fucking Trump.

See? Just as much proof that they stole the election from Trump as there are of all of your claims about them doing it to the DNC, isn't there?

Partisans have an amazing capacity to apply different standards to different narratives.
 
Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film “2000 Mules” poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentary’s writer and director, Dinesh D’Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. D’Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of “mules” illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The film’s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

“We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,” Mr. D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.


Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.

We all knew that it was a terrible film.
 
People still don't realize 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen. Everything Trump worried happened to him happened to Gore then Kerry in 2000 and 2004.

And then there's Bush lying us into Iraq. Even Trump said it, in 2008 and again in 2016. Republicans voted for Trump. But still Republicans, and a lot of people who are not Republicans, still to this day don't believe Bush would do such a thing.

“When she first got in and was named speaker, I met her. And I’m very impressed by her. I think she’s a very impressive person. I like her a lot. But I was surprised that she didn’t do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush. It was almost – it just seemed like she was going to really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which personally I think would’ve been a wonderful thing,” Trump told Blitzer in the interview.

“Impeaching him?” Blitzer asked.

“Absolutely. For the war. For the war,” said Trump, referring to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. “Well, he lied. He got us into the war with lies, and I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant and they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And yet Bush got us into this horrible war with lies. By lying. By saying they had weapons of mass destruction. By saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true.”

Asked about the remarks during a presidential debate eight years later, Trump said, “you do whatever you want – you call it whatever you want,” and reiterated his belief that the Bush administration lied.

You are insane.
 
Why don't you offer up an answer?
Because I don't do pretend and make believe as arguments, like you lot do.
Dude you get slapped around and don't even realize it
See what I mean. :lol: Are you pretending to slap people over the internet for the sake of argument? Why? Why do you people think pretend and make believe signals strength? :dunno: :lol:
 
The "truth" came out about the Covid crisis. It seems that the virus was leaked from a Chinese lab after all. Fauci lied about it and he was invested in the lab. The "truth" came out about Biden's claim that he would never pardon his son. In the mean time the desperate disappointed left worries about the NYT's opinion about a D'Souza film? WTF
 
:lmao:

No? So 2020 was a conspiracy? :dunno:

As we all see, it worked out great for America!

You thought Obama's third term would finally defeat America. Instead we all came out like the Whos in Whoville after the Grinch though he ended that nation. We prayed, we sung, we told the Lord we are eternally grateful -- and we voted Trump back in

Dems cheated and gave America our 4 worst years since the FDR Depression.

Which got Trump reelected and now with an absolutely All Star, deadly serious team behind him to chase down and eliminate the traitors and globalists.

Imagine, even it they try to kill Trump again, he's not alone and isolated like JFK. He's already got SEAL Teams taking our the Cartels!

Can you imagine the first conversation with Larry Fink? "So Larry, tell me all about the big short position you took on DJT the Friday before Butler PA?"

Had Trump been reelected in 2020, the country would still be half asleep and not caring about the Progressive Jihad on America

81.2MM Biden "votes" LOL

81,2OL,LOL
 
Last edited:
As we all see, it worked out great for America!

Dems cheated and gave America our 4 worst years since the FDR Depression.

Which got Trump reelected and now with an absolutely All Star, deadly serious team behind him to chase down and eliminate the traitors and globalists.

Imagine, even it they try to kill Trump again, he's not alone and isolated like JFK He's already got SEAL Teams taking our the Cartels!

Can you imagine the first conversation with Larry Fink? "So Larry, tell me all about the big short position you took on DJT the Friday before Butler PA?"

Had Trump reelected, the country would still be half asleep and not caring about the Progressive Jihad on America

81.2MM Biden "votes" LOL

81,2OL,LOL
Look at you even admitting to imagination right in front of us. Good for you! :lol:
 
Yeah, actually it is what Dinesh wrote.

I posted a link (post #29,) to it four or five hours before you made an ass of yourself by what you posted.

Oddball has debunked your bullshit several times in this thread.

You are just making yourself look like a fool when anyone that reads this thread can read D'Sousa's blog post for themselves.





This is how the entire "fact-checking," industry works. So-called "experts," take one thing wrong, or slightly inaccurate with a claim, and then say that the entire thing is false.


. . . I would have thought that the establishment would get wise to the this situation, (especially after that stunning electoral loss,) that due to the Streisand effect, these so called "fact-checks," usually have the opposite affect. They serve to make folks look more closely at information the establishment would rather have the population ignore.

That whole NYT supposed "fact-check," of RFKjr's claim about Fruit Loops? A perfect example.




NYT dragged for hilariously botched ‘fact check’ of RFK Jr.’s war on artificial ingredients​




Spoken like a true crazy MAGA conspiracy theory believing nutbag.
 
Back
Top Bottom