The truth has a way of coming out in the end.

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

They would accuse us of wanting an echo chamber.

Meanwhile, their ceaseless demands for censorship shows us that what they want is an echo chamber and absolute unanimous thinking. They like their echo chambers.

.

Rules for us and none for them.

It's like a spoon. We see our image on the convex side and they on the concave side.


.

 

[22lcidw]

Despite taking the posture of coming out of the gate swinging in response to revelations those of us on the Left knew to be true all along, you missed the mark.
As time passes the case for outcome determinate voter fraud only gets weaker. If you find that uncomfortable, so be it.

The real truth is that tens of millions of families are living with less than the promises made from the stolen election in 2020.

 

[White 6]

Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed​

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film “2000 Mules” poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentary’s writer and director, Dinesh D’Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. D’Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of “mules” illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The film’s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

“We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,” Mr. D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

www.nytimes.com

Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.

Everybody of normal intelligence knew 2000 mules was BS, anyway. That is why the election legal teams, couldn't even find a trump judge that would take it without evidence.

 

[theHawk]

Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed​

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film “2000 Mules” poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentary’s writer and director, Dinesh D’Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. D’Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of “mules” illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The film’s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

“We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,” Mr. D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

www.nytimes.com

Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.

LOL bullshit.

He still caught vast numbers of Dems going to and from DNC offices and then straight to ballot drop boxes. Just because they may have mixed up some of the video footage doesn’t debunk the premise.

We all know that 2020 was cheated because the mysterious “81 million” votes didn’t show up in 2024 after all the laws and rules passed to help fight against election fraud.

 

[Rambunctious]

Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed​

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film “2000 Mules” poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentary’s writer and director, Dinesh D’Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. D’Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of “mules” illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The film’s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

“We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,” Mr. D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

www.nytimes.com

Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.

Nice try... what this election has proven is indeed the blue ballot centers were forging and counting bad ballots in 2020 via the covid rule changes... and the entire DC swamp was in on it....

 

[Rambunctious]

Give us a break the ballot harvesting State of CA is still counting ballots.... dems cheat but now it won't be so easy.... you libs are an extreme minority and that is why Joe opened our border.... for new dems to come in... so stop acting as if you are not... this nation is center right...

 

[AntonToo]

I thought this thread was going to be about the Xiden Crime Family cartel.

Because you are asstruth.

 

[AntonToo]

Indian-Giver

The Hindu dindu is a toxic influencer. He's trying to seduce MAGA into going to ridiculous extremes. He is a saboteur, sucking up to the Rightists' Deep State, which has a mortal fear of Populism.

Being a toxic idiot who fools people for a living has nothing to do with him being of certain ethnicity.

 

[MisterBeale]

NY Slimes is State agitprop and paywall shit....The very antithesis of truth.

I'll withhold any judgement until all the real facts are in.

Statement on 2000 Mules​

D'Souza Media | Statement on 2000 Mules

dineshdsouza.com

". . . We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data.

I know that the film and my book create the impression that these individuals were mules that had been identified as suspected ballot harvesters based on their geotracked cell phone data. While all of these individuals’ images were blurred and unrecognizable, one of the individuals has since come forward publicly and has initiated a lawsuit over the use of his blurred image in the film and the book. I owe this individual, Mark Andrews, an apology. I now understand that the surveillance videos used in the film were characterized on the basis of inaccurate information provided to me and my team. If I had known then that the videos were not linked to geolocation data, I would have clarified this and produced and edited the film differently.

We operated in good faith and in reliance on True the Vote. We continue to have confidence in their work and also in the basic message of “2000 Mules,” namely, that the 2020 election was not the “most secure election in US history”—far from it!—and that there was systematic election fraud sufficient to call the outcome into question. We also continue to have faith that True the Vote’s underlying geolocation data and analysis uncovered highly suspicious cell phone travel patterns, including a significant number of cell phone IDs that were recorded at more than ten drop box locations. While the video in the film created an incorrect inference as to Mr. Andrews, the underlying premise of the film holds true.

Indeed, the accuracy of the general proposition of ‘2000 Mules” was publicly confirmed recently by the disclosure of a leading Democratic organizer, who admitted to an undercover journalist that the premise of “2000 Mules” is accurate. . . ."

 

[d0gbreath]

2000 Mules was simply every stolen election conspiracy rolled into one.

 

[toobfreak]

More than two years after the widely debunked film “2000 Mules” poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud,

Widely debunked? Hey stoopid, the 2020 election steal has already been admitted to, BRAGGED about in national print nearly four years ago, even naming who was involved, giving details on the organizations involved, what they did ad HOW they did it.

 

[SeaMajor7]

"We choose truth over facts!"
-- Joe Biden

 

[yidnar]

Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed​

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film “2000 Mules” poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentary’s writer and director, Dinesh D’Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. D’Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of “mules” illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The film’s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

“We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,” Mr. D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

www.nytimes.com

Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.

 

[yidnar]

Especially when the lie is so egregious.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed​

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

More than two years after the widely debunked film “2000 Mules” poured gasoline on right-wing conspiracy theories about election fraud, the documentary’s writer and director, Dinesh D’Souza, has acknowledged that its findings were based on a faulty analysis.

Mr. D’Souza said in a statement on his website that the analysis used in the film, which claimed to depict a vast ring of “mules” illegally gathering large numbers of ballots and surreptitiously placing them in drop boxes, was incorrect.

The film’s premise was based on matching surveillance videos from drop-box locations with geolocated cellphone data that appeared to show repeated trips to areas near drop boxes during the 2020 election.

“We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,” Mr. D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, said in the statement, which he released on Nov. 26.

Director of ‘2000 Mules’ Acknowledges the Conspiratorial Film Was Flawed

The director, Dinesh D’Souza, who is facing a lawsuit over the documentary, admitted that an analysis used to make claims about election fraud that were later debunked had been faulty.

www.nytimes.com

Factual accuracy was never the point anyway. Telling the lie was. Getting the rubes on board with Baby Donald's national pity party of fake grievance to sooth his fragile ego, and anger The Following, was the goal. It worked like a charm. They still believe it. It is trumpworld's essential alternative reality.

 

[Oddball]

View attachment 1049407

Statement on 2000 Mules​

D'Souza Media | Statement on 2000 Mules

dineshdsouza.com

". . . We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data.

I know that the film and my book create the impression that these individuals were mules that had been identified as suspected ballot harvesters based on their geotracked cell phone data. While all of these individuals’ images were blurred and unrecognizable, one of the individuals has since come forward publicly and has initiated a lawsuit over the use of his blurred image in the film and the book. I owe this individual, Mark Andrews, an apology. I now understand that the surveillance videos used in the film were characterized on the basis of inaccurate information provided to me and my team. If I had known then that the videos were not linked to geolocation data, I would have clarified this and produced and edited the film differently.

We operated in good faith and in reliance on True the Vote. We continue to have confidence in their work and also in the basic message of “2000 Mules,” namely, that the 2020 election was not the “most secure election in US history”—far from it!—and that there was systematic election fraud sufficient to call the outcome into question. We also continue to have faith that True the Vote’s underlying geolocation data and analysis uncovered highly suspicious cell phone travel patterns, including a significant number of cell phone IDs that were recorded at more than ten drop box locations. While the video in the film created an incorrect inference as to Mr. Andrews, the underlying premise of the film holds true.

Indeed, the accuracy of the general proposition of ‘2000 Mules” was publicly confirmed recently by the disclosure of a leading Democratic organizer, who admitted to an undercover journalist that the premise of “2000 Mules” is accurate. . . ."

More: "We also continue to have faith that True the Vote’s underlying geolocation data and analysis uncovered highly suspicious cell phone travel patterns, including a significant number of cell phone IDs that were recorded at more than ten drop box locations.


While the video in the film created an incorrect inference as to Mr. Andrews, the underlying premise of the film holds true. Indeed, the accuracy of the general proposition of ‘2000 Mules” was publicly confirmed recently by the disclosure of a leading Democratic organizer, who admitted to an undercover journalist that the premise of “2000 Mules” is accurate."

 

[BULLDOG]

MAGA influencer Dinesh D’Souza posted a statement on his website over the weekend at long last admitting that his conspiracy theory film “2,000 Mules” was produced “on the basis of inaccurate information provided to me and my team” Most sane people already knew that. I don't think Fox has gotten around to mentioning the statement yet.

MSN

 

[1srelluc]

That's a lota mules.....Everyone knows it just takes twenty to pull a borax rig.

 

[BULLDOG]

That's a lota mules.....Everyone knows it just takes twenty to pull a borax rig.

Sister Sarah only wanted two. Will MAGAs admit they believed such a massive lie?

 

[MarathonMike]

MAGA influencer Dinesh D’Souza posted a statement on his website over the weekend at long last admitting that his conspiracy theory film “2,000 Mules” was produced “on the basis of inaccurate information provided to me and my team” Most sane people already knew that. I don't think Fox has gotten around to mentioning the statement yet.

MSN

"Some of the films claims were flawed" was the crux of his statement. The film itself was excellent and revealed widespread election tampering that is irrefutable.

 

[fncceo]

Everyone knows it just takes twenty to pull a borax rig.

Everyone over 60.