Dear JakeStarkey and Truthspeaker:
I agree with what both of you are saying.
Jake, nobody can abrogate your ultimate choice.
We can support one another, be our brothers' keeper, but in the end people have to "choose" to forgive in order to receive God's love and understanding more fully.
Nobody can take that step for anyone else. We can support it along the way, and yes we can make a difference if someone has enough support to forgive and receive.
But it is always up to them and their timing. So you are right, that we should emphasize this importance of taking individual steps that no one else can do for us.
I believe more like Truthspeaker seems to be saying, that it is good that we pray to bless all others to receive and be fully embraced and saved in the love of Christ Jesus.
I don't see how that can ever be wrong, as long as you are not attaching some unnatural spiritism to it like ill will or witchcraft which backfires on the person wishing the ill will.
When I read what Truthspeaker is saying, he is not trying to bypass or supercede any person or family's responsibility. Even praying for persons will help prepare that family to take the steps themselves and is not doing it for them.
When Truthspeaker prays for all others, without condition, then he is attracting and multiplying those same blessings for himself as well. What comes around goes around. So if there was something amiss in his prayers, it would come back and effect him as the person responsible for the fault.
Jake I am trying to see what you are saying, how you don't want to blindly pray or heal or teach that this can be done blindly by others; and you DO want to emphasize the importance of people and family responsibility. But after that, there is social and collective responsibility for the larger spiritual family, and we are all children of God as one humanity.
So on THAT level, these are our brothers and sisters we are praying for.
And from those prayers, YES I do agree that the closer family will also receive greater spiritual support to take their responsibilities that no one else can carry for them.
I see you are both right in your concerns and points.
I do not see a problem with what either of you are saying.
Thank you very much Gentlemen
and may that many more people be blessed and receive more spiritual support to do their part because of what you contribute with your prayers and wisdom in your words
Yours truly,
Emily
Sheesh, your logic is stupidly illogical. "You do understand that being upset by [Aryan racial superiority doctrines] we have the authority to change the course of [assert whatever].
The issue is you have no authority while at the same time you arrogantly abrogate others' family responsibilities. Shame on you.
We believe Jesus and Heavenly Father will judge each person. The only thing we believe that baptisms for the dead affects after this life is whether the person baptized and Jesus accept it or not.
How is it we abrogate others' responsibilities exactly? Were people who had no chance at a knowledge of Christ in this life responsible to somehow know to be baptized?
Because that responsibility is not yours but that of the family of the deceased. Go ask the family, and if they tell you 'no', than you can place the responsibility on them. To do otherwise is to practice unrighteous dominion in the name of God. Have you no decency?