]
Explain how forensic pathologists can identify race from skeletal remains.
Extensive DNA studies don't show that there subspecies (races) within modern humans.
Yes. Different genes for skin and hair color can be seen between individuals but no patterns of genes across the human genome have been found to show one race from another.
It's not about not noticing the difference between the way two humans look. It's about incorrect taxonomy.
How do you define race ?
Are there better ways of separating humans into taxonomical groupings ?
AND NO.
It's that we are all the same
There are genetic differences within racial groups. Pathologists can tell race from skeletal remains.
Yet these differences still fall way short of showing sub-speciation and that is what biologists use to show different races or breeds of bigger species
Lots of white scientists worked morning non and night to prove race as a biological fact. They all failed.
They failed not because genetic differences can’t be seen between humans (after all, if there weren’t mDNA differences, no one would nothing about human maternal ancestry)
They failed because genetic differences don't support social races, “yellow”, “black”, “white” and “red”.
The only living subspecies of the species
Homo sapiens is Homo sapiens sapiens. That's what the science knows.
And it's almost certain to remain that way unless the Yeti or the Sasquatch decide to go to a science lab for a DNA test
Why do you think blood transfusions and bone marrow transplants work ?
Why can a “black ” man's blood can save an white man's life with a transfusion ?