The Theory Of Evolution Is Completely Useless.

Without evolution no scientific discoveries would be possible.
Name one scientific discovery that required the theory of evolution.

There would be no scientific discoveries if we had not evolved from single cell creatures

You evolved from a single cell creature?
Correct. We all did. In fact, we all share a common ancestor....ONE particular, single-celled individual. Cool, huh?
 
Without evolution no scientific discoveries would be possible.
Name one scientific discovery that required the theory of evolution.

There would be no scientific discoveries if we had not evolved from single cell creatures

You evolved from a single cell creature?
Correct. We all did. In fact, we all share a common ancestor....ONE particular, single-celled individual. Cool, huh?

My point was he still is a single cell creature.

Just some humor to move things along.
 
I think you missed his point.

I didn't ;)

screen-shot-2011-05-23-at-12-56-53-pm.png
 
Hmmm, not only racist - but anti-science

Awesome! :rolleyes:

1. •Bioinformatics, a multi-billion-dollar industry, consists largely of the comparison of genetic sequences. Descent with modification is one of its most basic assumptions.
2. •Diseases and pests evolve resistance to the drugs and pesticides we use against them. Evolutionary theory is used in the field of resistance management in both medicine and agriculture (Bull and Wichman 2001).
3. •Evolutionary theory is used to manage fisheries for greater yields (Conover and Munch 2002).
4. •Artificial selection has been used since prehistory, but it has become much more efficient with the addition of quantitative trait locus mapping.
5. •Knowledge of the evolution of parasite virulence in human populations can help guide public health policy (Galvani 2003).
6. •Sex allocation theory, based on evolution theory, was used to predict conditions under which the highly endangered kakapo bird would produce more female offspring, which retrieved it from the brink of extinction (Sutherland 2002).
7. •Tracing genes of known function and comparing how they are related to unknown genes helps one to predict unknown gene function, which is foundational for drug discovery (Branca 2002; Eisen and Wu 2002; Searls 2003).
8. •Phylogenetic analysis is a standard part of epidemiology, since it allows the identification of disease reservoirs and sometimes the tracking of step-by-step transmission of disease. For example, phylogenetic analysis confirmed that a Florida dentist was infecting his patients with HIV, that HIV-1 and HIV-2 were transmitted to humans from chimpanzees and mangabey monkeys in the twentieth century, and, when polio was being eradicated from the Americas, that new cases were not coming from hidden reservoirs (Bull and Wichman 2001). It was used in 2002 to help convict a man of intentionally infecting someone with HIV (Vogel 1998). The same principle can be used to trace the source of bioweapons (Cummings and Relman 2002).
9. •Phylogenetic analysis to track the diversity of a pathogen can be used to select an appropriate vaccine for a particular region (Gaschen et al. 2002).
10. •Ribotyping is a technique for identifying an organism or at least finding its closest known relative by mapping its ribosomal RNA onto the tree of life. It can be used even when the organisms cannot be cultured or recognized by other methods. Ribotyping and other genotyping methods have been used to find previously unknown infectious agents of human disease (Bull and Wichman 2001; Relman 1999).
11. •Phylogenetic analysis helps in determining protein folds, since proteins diverging from a common ancestor tend to conserve their folds (Benner 2001).​

Advances to society because of the Theory of Evolution : Evolution & Natural Selection • Rational Skepticism Forum

Pepe Trump asked me to say hello

cant-stump-the-trump-pepe-trump-2567644.png
In every example you presented, the theory of Darwinian evolution played no part at all. Different branches of science, such as biology were used. Evolution played no part whatsoever. Try again.
 
Without evolution no scientific discoveries would be possible.

Really? So before the theory of evolution there were no scientific theories?

Well then, to hell with Copernicus, Galileo, Isaac Newton,............................................

Not the theory....evolution itself

You do not see many tree slugs debating Newtonian Physics
 
Without evolution no scientific discoveries would be possible.

Really? So before the theory of evolution there were no scientific theories?

Well then, to hell with Copernicus, Galileo, Isaac Newton,............................................

They would not have existed if we didn't evolve.

I mean if you believe in a supernatural beginning, they wouldn't have existed if if the supernatural hand of your god didn't poof us into being either.
 
Hmmm, not only racist - but anti-science

Awesome! :rolleyes:

1. •Bioinformatics, a multi-billion-dollar industry, consists largely of the comparison of genetic sequences. Descent with modification is one of its most basic assumptions.
2. •Diseases and pests evolve resistance to the drugs and pesticides we use against them. Evolutionary theory is used in the field of resistance management in both medicine and agriculture (Bull and Wichman 2001).
3. •Evolutionary theory is used to manage fisheries for greater yields (Conover and Munch 2002).
4. •Artificial selection has been used since prehistory, but it has become much more efficient with the addition of quantitative trait locus mapping.
5. •Knowledge of the evolution of parasite virulence in human populations can help guide public health policy (Galvani 2003).
6. •Sex allocation theory, based on evolution theory, was used to predict conditions under which the highly endangered kakapo bird would produce more female offspring, which retrieved it from the brink of extinction (Sutherland 2002).
7. •Tracing genes of known function and comparing how they are related to unknown genes helps one to predict unknown gene function, which is foundational for drug discovery (Branca 2002; Eisen and Wu 2002; Searls 2003).
8. •Phylogenetic analysis is a standard part of epidemiology, since it allows the identification of disease reservoirs and sometimes the tracking of step-by-step transmission of disease. For example, phylogenetic analysis confirmed that a Florida dentist was infecting his patients with HIV, that HIV-1 and HIV-2 were transmitted to humans from chimpanzees and mangabey monkeys in the twentieth century, and, when polio was being eradicated from the Americas, that new cases were not coming from hidden reservoirs (Bull and Wichman 2001). It was used in 2002 to help convict a man of intentionally infecting someone with HIV (Vogel 1998). The same principle can be used to trace the source of bioweapons (Cummings and Relman 2002).
9. •Phylogenetic analysis to track the diversity of a pathogen can be used to select an appropriate vaccine for a particular region (Gaschen et al. 2002).
10. •Ribotyping is a technique for identifying an organism or at least finding its closest known relative by mapping its ribosomal RNA onto the tree of life. It can be used even when the organisms cannot be cultured or recognized by other methods. Ribotyping and other genotyping methods have been used to find previously unknown infectious agents of human disease (Bull and Wichman 2001; Relman 1999).
11. •Phylogenetic analysis helps in determining protein folds, since proteins diverging from a common ancestor tend to conserve their folds (Benner 2001).​

Advances to society because of the Theory of Evolution : Evolution & Natural Selection • Rational Skepticism Forum

Pepe Trump asked me to say hello

cant-stump-the-trump-pepe-trump-2567644.png
In every example you presented, the theory of Darwinian evolution played no part at all. Different branches of science, such as biology were used. Evolution played no part whatsoever. Try again.


^^

See what I mean, people? This guy knows less than nothing about evolution. He doesnt even know why he sounds stupid. Pointless exercise.
 
In fact, I challenge anyone to point out a single scientific discovery that couldn't have been made without evolution. Go ahead. I'll wait.............
The reason we have goosebumps.
What does that have to do with anything?
When you figure that out you will not have to ask silly questions. Hint
What a load of BS. For one thing, they are simply assuming that we inherited this from an animal ancestor. There is no evidence for this. And how was the theory of evolution responsible for this discovery? Be specific.
Of what use are goosebumps to us since we have no hair? If our ancestors were covered by hair the goosebumps would have provided a value function. We are no longer covered by a dense coat of hair but the functionality remains.

What other explanation for goosebumps could there be?
I'm sure there is an another explanation. But you wouldn't even care. Would you? After all, you people used to, and some still claim that much of our DNA is junk DNA. Recent discoveries have completely debunked this silly belief. Real science always overturns mythology. Especially the myth of evolution. BTW. Humans were never covered in fur. We did not evolve from apes. We did not evolve from anything. There is absolutely no scientific evidence to support such a claim. And if you even mention the fossil record, I'll laugh in your face. What a joke. Even atheist scientists think it's a crock of shit.
 
Without evolution no scientific discoveries would be possible.

Really? So before the theory of evolution there were no scientific theories?

Well then, to hell with Copernicus, Galileo, Isaac Newton,............................................

They would not have existed if we didn't evolve.

I mean if you believe in a supernatural beginning, they wouldn't have existed if if the supernatural hand of your god didn't poof us into being either.

Fine and dandy, where did the cell come from?
 
Without evolution no scientific discoveries would be possible.

Really? So before the theory of evolution there were no scientific theories?

Well then, to hell with Copernicus, Galileo, Isaac Newton,............................................

They would not have existed if we didn't evolve.

I mean if you believe in a supernatural beginning, they wouldn't have existed if if the supernatural hand of your god didn't poof us into being either.

Fine and dandy, where did the cell come from?

From organization of persistent organics via selection.
 
Without evolution no scientific discoveries would be possible.

Really? So before the theory of evolution there were no scientific theories?

Well then, to hell with Copernicus, Galileo, Isaac Newton,............................................

They would not have existed if we didn't evolve.

I mean if you believe in a supernatural beginning, they wouldn't have existed if if the supernatural hand of your god didn't poof us into being either.
Circular reasoning at it's finest. If this, then that. The 'this' is unproven. So your argument falls flat. Try again.
 
Without evolution no scientific discoveries would be possible.

Really? So before the theory of evolution there were no scientific theories?

Well then, to hell with Copernicus, Galileo, Isaac Newton,............................................

They would not have existed if we didn't evolve.

I mean if you believe in a supernatural beginning, they wouldn't have existed if if the supernatural hand of your god didn't poof us into being either.

Fine and dandy, where did the cell come from?
Didn't you get the memo? It just popped into existence all by itself. Please try to keep up. ^_^
 
Without evolution no scientific discoveries would be possible.

Really? So before the theory of evolution there were no scientific theories?

Well then, to hell with Copernicus, Galileo, Isaac Newton,............................................

They would not have existed if we didn't evolve.

I mean if you believe in a supernatural beginning, they wouldn't have existed if if the supernatural hand of your god didn't poof us into being either.

Fine and dandy, where did the cell come from?

From organization of persistent organics via selection.

Interesting.

What is science? Is it not testing and assessing and drawing conclusions?

You expect me to believe that a human cell just happened and you know that the conditions had to be just so for a cell to be birthed, yet you can't reproduce it or observe it in nature.

Why not stick to science?
 
Without evolution no scientific discoveries would be possible.

Really? So before the theory of evolution there were no scientific theories?

Well then, to hell with Copernicus, Galileo, Isaac Newton,............................................

They would not have existed if we didn't evolve.

I mean if you believe in a supernatural beginning, they wouldn't have existed if if the supernatural hand of your god didn't poof us into being either.

Fine and dandy, where did the cell come from?

Good question. One that the theory of evolution doesn't address. But good nonetheless.
 
Cells are comprised of basic elements

Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen, Nitrogen
 
15th post
Without evolution no scientific discoveries would be possible.

Really? So before the theory of evolution there were no scientific theories?

Well then, to hell with Copernicus, Galileo, Isaac Newton,............................................

They would not have existed if we didn't evolve.

I mean if you believe in a supernatural beginning, they wouldn't have existed if if the supernatural hand of your god didn't poof us into being either.

Fine and dandy, where did the cell come from?

From organization of persistent organics via selection.

Interesting.

What is science? Is it not testing and assessing and drawing conclusions?

You expect me to believe that a human cell just happened and you know that the conditions had to be just so for a cell to be birthed, yet you can't reproduce it or observe it in nature.

Why not stick to science?
Evolution is his religion. He dare not question it, or the mighty ghost of Darwin will smite him.
 
Without evolution no scientific discoveries would be possible.

Really? So before the theory of evolution there were no scientific theories?

Well then, to hell with Copernicus, Galileo, Isaac Newton,............................................

They would not have existed if we didn't evolve.

I mean if you believe in a supernatural beginning, they wouldn't have existed if if the supernatural hand of your god didn't poof us into being either.

Fine and dandy, where did the cell come from?
Didn't you get the memo? It just popped into existence all by itself. Please try to keep up. ^_^

I saw a meteor come screaming down and slammed into the earth. By the time I got their it had transformed into an ant colony.

Amazing.
 
Cells are comprised of basic elements

Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen, Nitrogen

Really, I had no idea. I thought there was more there, but guess not.

So, go take those elements and create a cell. I stand by for a minute or two...................
 
The Theory Of Evolution Is Completely Useless.

In fact, I challenge anyone to point out a single scientific discovery that couldn't have been made without evolution. Go ahead. I'll wait.............

Most anti-science threads are pretty dumb, but this one takes the cake

LOL
 
Back
Top Bottom