The Temple Mount Myth Revealed

[The Irish Ram]

There is a lot of contradictions about the supposed Mount Temple, when Maimonide visited Jerusalem he proposed that a temple in the city will unite the prayer of jews and this temple shouldn't built by humans but will come from heaven.

Concerning the place, some rabbis says that it's below the actual Alaqsa Mosque, others says it's above but other rabbis confirm that it's not in that place but near Jerusalem or in Nablus mount.

Professor in Tel Aviv university and Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues confirm that many biblical stories never happened, but were written by what he calls `a creative copywriter' to advance an ideological agenda.
Israel Finkelstein states:

"There is no archaeological evidence for it," he says. "This is something unexampled in history. I don't think there is any other place in the world where there was a city with such a wretched material infrastructure but which succeeded in creating such a sweeping movement in its favor as Jerusalem, which even in its time of greatness was a joke in comparison to the cities of Assyria, Babylon or Egypt. It was a typical mountain village. There is no magnificent finding, no gates of Nebuchadnezzar, no Assyrian reliefs, no Egyptian temples - nothing. Even the temple couldn't compete with the temples of Egypt and their splendor."

Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues are stirring controversy with contentions that many biblical stories never

Too bad we've found a coin from the First Temple period in the Temple Mount.

You Islamos all need to blow yourselves up for Allah before sunset. Get busy.

The Bible is so accurate that archeologists have it in one hand and a shovel in the other. The amount of historic information is invaluable. And they are dragging science along with them.
And as always, prophecy.... that God can, and even the best creative copywriter cannot.

Oh yes the fake exodus, certainty not as described in the OT. no they can't find any historical evidence of David or Solomon, they will fabricate some I'm sure. The bible is not prophecy, its typology. How do you think Cinderella fit into those slippers.

You are not keeping up with archeology:

Victory over the King of the House of David.

 

[The Irish Ram]

As I recall we kinda already discussed this one. There's nothing antique about any of the remaining itinerant Arab Muslim constructs on the Temple Mount and so it really wouldn't be violating any antiquities laws to just rip it down and let the native people ( the Judaic people ) build whatever they want there......

Seems to me another simple matter of native rights. Whats the colonists doing putting up new structures on the holly site of the native people anyway.

Rip down the dome and end the Arab Muslim colonial age in Israel

Their mosque has been there longer than any Hebrew temple, and is a historic place. Its just too darn bad the Hebrews didn't think enough of Palestine to defend it, isn't it.

It is surprising that a good Catholic as Penelope would deny the temple in Jerusalem. Didn't Jesus worship at the temple in Jerusalem?

A Portrait Of Jesus' World - Temple Culture | From Jesus To Christ - The First Christians | FRONTLINE | PBS

Worshiped, taught, and tried in the Temple. Nicodemus recorded every bit of it in real time.

 

[theliq]

...no they can't find any historical evidence of David or Solomon....

We can correct your ignorance until we are all blue in the face and it will make not whit of difference, because you are entirely unwilling to look at facts, objective truths, historical evidence. Evidence like the Tel Dan Stele, the Mesha Stele, the Merneptah Stele, and the Kurkh Monolith. Evidence like the coins and bullae found at the Temple Mount and in the Sifting Project. Evidence like the Hebrew script Immer bullae which corresponds to Jeremiah 20. Evidence like the "Freedom for Zion" coin from the Roman times and the First Revolt and the "Half-Shekel" coin (Exodus 30). Evidence, already mentioned, such as the writings of Josephus. Evidence in the Tombs of the Patriarchs, and Rachel and Joseph, remembered and honored for thousands of years. Evidence of the existence of the Kotel itself.

It doesn't matter what we present to you (and by "you", I mean all those on this board who blindly and ignorantly post comments and threads rejecting Israel's -- the Jewish people's -- history), you will not accept it. No matter what we say, you will blindly -- intentionally, willfully blindly -- reject it or move the parameters of the discussion to a new realm in order to support your rejection of anything Jewish.

You claim that there is no connection between the Jewish people and the historical lands in question. We prove there is and ..

You claim Jewish history doesn't exist. We prove it does and ....

You claim that its not Jewish. We prove it is and ...

You claim it is pre-dated by another culture. We prove it is not and ...

You claim that an invading, conquering culture has precedence. We prove they do not and ...

You claim that the modern Jewish people are not really Jews. We prove we are and ...

You claim that the Jewish people are not a "people" or a "culture" or an "indigenous group". We prove we are and ...

You claim that the Jewish people are just a religion. We prove we aren't and ...

You claim that ..... and on and on and on it goes.

Until, once pressed for actual, objective criteria for what "counts", you disappear because you CAN'T answer that question without revealing that there is NO criteria for you other than, "as long as its not the Jews".

It doesn't matter what proofs we offer. It doesn't even matter that the proofs we offer are obvious and clearly visible in the world and obviously true and it is pointedly SILLY to argue against them.

Well Penny is partially right,the first temple was that of the ..........in their capital of Salem,before the Israelites arrived............the Jews were in this area during Biblical times after the Romans there were very few Jews in Palestine/The Holy Land.....until the emergence of the Zionists Illegal entry circa 1900 onwards but they flooded the area in 1948 onwards after the Jews now Israelis had bribed member nations of the UN,again Illegally.

The new Israeli State then allow anyone purporting to be a Jew were then entered this area of Land that was Stolen,they have since Illegally occupied more and more of Palestine.

After 1948 Jews/Zionists created a new dicotamy sic where Ashkanazi sic Jews entered Israel.....Penny is correct in saying they were not real Jews as they were converts only to Judiasum sic,as they are actually people of Turkic and Central Asian origin..Not Sherpardic Jews(who like the Palestinians are Semitic people)I would probably have more Jewish blood than them,if the truth were known.

The mentality of the 1948 and afterwards are not of the Jews of old but a concocted mentality....they really have NO claim to any part of the Holy Land as they have NO direct link to Abraham....just converts

Most of the claims you make are completely false and just a way to try to give the State of Israel legitimacy........Who and what really are the majority of the people who live in this State you call Israel.........because most are not true Jews in any way..steven

 

[Shusha]

....they really have NO claim to any part of the Holy Land as they have NO direct link to Abraham....just converts ...

Oh for the love of...

Do you have to make it this easy? How are Arab Muslims NOT "just" converts to the history and religious faith of Abraham?

 

[Phoenall]

There is a lot of contradictions about the supposed Mount Temple, when Maimonide visited Jerusalem he proposed that a temple in the city will unite the prayer of jews and this temple shouldn't built by humans but will come from heaven.

Concerning the place, some rabbis says that it's below the actual Alaqsa Mosque, others says it's above but other rabbis confirm that it's not in that place but near Jerusalem or in Nablus mount.

Professor in Tel Aviv university and Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues confirm that many biblical stories never happened, but were written by what he calls `a creative copywriter' to advance an ideological agenda.
Israel Finkelstein states:

"There is no archaeological evidence for it," he says. "This is something unexampled in history. I don't think there is any other place in the world where there was a city with such a wretched material infrastructure but which succeeded in creating such a sweeping movement in its favor as Jerusalem, which even in its time of greatness was a joke in comparison to the cities of Assyria, Babylon or Egypt. It was a typical mountain village. There is no magnificent finding, no gates of Nebuchadnezzar, no Assyrian reliefs, no Egyptian temples - nothing. Even the temple couldn't compete with the temples of Egypt and their splendor."

Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues are stirring controversy with contentions that many biblical stories never

What kind of BS are you trying to push? What myths? I've never heard such gobbletygook.

Just confirmation from israelis archeologist that this temple is a myth in history.

Those jews are quite the mystery , even to themselves.

They cant be as you know so much about them, but the muslims are very secretive, underhand and devious. That is why they wont allow just anyone from going to the Jewish holy cities of Mecca and Medina

 

[Phoenall]

There is a lot of contradictions about the supposed Mount Temple, when Maimonide visited Jerusalem he proposed that a temple in the city will unite the prayer of jews and this temple shouldn't built by humans but will come from heaven.

Concerning the place, some rabbis says that it's below the actual Alaqsa Mosque, others says it's above but other rabbis confirm that it's not in that place but near Jerusalem or in Nablus mount.

Professor in Tel Aviv university and Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues confirm that many biblical stories never happened, but were written by what he calls `a creative copywriter' to advance an ideological agenda.
Israel Finkelstein states:

"There is no archaeological evidence for it," he says. "This is something unexampled in history. I don't think there is any other place in the world where there was a city with such a wretched material infrastructure but which succeeded in creating such a sweeping movement in its favor as Jerusalem, which even in its time of greatness was a joke in comparison to the cities of Assyria, Babylon or Egypt. It was a typical mountain village. There is no magnificent finding, no gates of Nebuchadnezzar, no Assyrian reliefs, no Egyptian temples - nothing. Even the temple couldn't compete with the temples of Egypt and their splendor."

Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues are stirring controversy with contentions that many biblical stories never

Waqf Bulldozers on Temple Mount May Be Destroying Jewish History

Arab Muslims Bulldoze Jewish evidence away on Arab-occupied Temple Mount

You referring to Mughrabi-Bridge

or Sheikh Eid, which Israel bought, they paid for the whole area to allow access to the mount

In direct violation of the agreement letting the Muslim pigs on the a Temple Mount.

What agreement?? One can't destroy history that never existed.

The agreement allowing the Jews access to the Temple mount. And the only history that never existed was that of the muslims. Everything they have they stole from others and tried to claim as their invention.

 

[Phoenall]

There is a lot of contradictions about the supposed Mount Temple, when Maimonide visited Jerusalem he proposed that a temple in the city will unite the prayer of jews and this temple shouldn't built by humans but will come from heaven.

Concerning the place, some rabbis says that it's below the actual Alaqsa Mosque, others says it's above but other rabbis confirm that it's not in that place but near Jerusalem or in Nablus mount.

Professor in Tel Aviv university and Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues confirm that many biblical stories never happened, but were written by what he calls `a creative copywriter' to advance an ideological agenda.
Israel Finkelstein states:

"There is no archaeological evidence for it," he says. "This is something unexampled in history. I don't think there is any other place in the world where there was a city with such a wretched material infrastructure but which succeeded in creating such a sweeping movement in its favor as Jerusalem, which even in its time of greatness was a joke in comparison to the cities of Assyria, Babylon or Egypt. It was a typical mountain village. There is no magnificent finding, no gates of Nebuchadnezzar, no Assyrian reliefs, no Egyptian temples - nothing. Even the temple couldn't compete with the temples of Egypt and their splendor."

Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues are stirring controversy with contentions that many biblical stories never

So you think a book that is more myth is better than the myth it purports to mythologize?

There is a problem here of the tail chasing the dog.

Josephus Flavius the Jewish/Roman general/historian is the best source of what actually existed in Jerusalem.

He was there and he wrote contemporaneously.

He saw the temple. He walked it.

Do you think he is Paul, Jesus or Vespasian, or a little of both. Note the typology in his writings. King Herod built a temple and temple mount. That is what he writes about .

 

[Phoenall]

And what do you have contempranious to that era saying that the Jews did not exist and they did not build a temple in Jerusalem. Apart from islamonazi propaganda, lies and blood libels, you bring no supporting evidence to the board and ignore the many requests for evidence

 

[Phoenall]

...no they can't find any historical evidence of David or Solomon....

We can correct your ignorance until we are all blue in the face and it will make not whit of difference, because you are entirely unwilling to look at facts, objective truths, historical evidence. Evidence like the Tel Dan Stele, the Mesha Stele, the Merneptah Stele, and the Kurkh Monolith. Evidence like the coins and bullae found at the Temple Mount and in the Sifting Project. Evidence like the Hebrew script Immer bullae which corresponds to Jeremiah 20. Evidence like the "Freedom for Zion" coin from the Roman times and the First Revolt and the "Half-Shekel" coin (Exodus 30). Evidence, already mentioned, such as the writings of Josephus. Evidence in the Tombs of the Patriarchs, and Rachel and Joseph, remembered and honored for thousands of years. Evidence of the existence of the Kotel itself.

It doesn't matter what we present to you (and by "you", I mean all those on this board who blindly and ignorantly post comments and threads rejecting Israel's -- the Jewish people's -- history), you will not accept it. No matter what we say, you will blindly -- intentionally, willfully blindly -- reject it or move the parameters of the discussion to a new realm in order to support your rejection of anything Jewish.

You claim that there is no connection between the Jewish people and the historical lands in question. We prove there is and ..

You claim Jewish history doesn't exist. We prove it does and ....

You claim that its not Jewish. We prove it is and ...

You claim it is pre-dated by another culture. We prove it is not and ...

You claim that an invading, conquering culture has precedence. We prove they do not and ...

You claim that the modern Jewish people are not really Jews. We prove we are and ...

You claim that the Jewish people are not a "people" or a "culture" or an "indigenous group". We prove we are and ...

You claim that the Jewish people are just a religion. We prove we aren't and ...

You claim that ..... and on and on and on it goes.

Until, once pressed for actual, objective criteria for what "counts", you disappear because you CAN'T answer that question without revealing that there is NO criteria for you other than, "as long as its not the Jews".

It doesn't matter what proofs we offer. It doesn't even matter that the proofs we offer are obvious and clearly visible in the world and obviously true and it is pointedly SILLY to argue against them.

Well Penny is partially right,the first temple was that of the ..........in their capital of Salem,before the Israelites arrived............the Jews were in this area during Biblical times after the Romans there were very few Jews in Palestine/The Holy Land.....until the emergence of the Zionists Illegal entry circa 1900 onwards but they flooded the area in 1948 onwards after the Jews now Israelis had bribed member nations of the UN,again Illegally.

The new Israeli State then allow anyone purporting to be a Jew were then entered this area of Land that was Stolen,they have since Illegally occupied more and more of Palestine.

After 1948 Jews/Zionists created a new dicotamy sic where Ashkanazi sic Jews entered Israel.....Penny is correct in saying they were not real Jews as they were converts only to Judiasum sic,as they are actually people of Turkic and Central Asian origin..Not Sherpardic Jews(who like the Palestinians are Semitic people)I would probably have more Jewish blood than them,if the truth were known.

The mentality of the 1948 and afterwards are not of the Jews of old but a concocted mentality....they really have NO claim to any part of the Holy Land as they have NO direct link to Abraham....just converts

Most of the claims you make are completely false and just a way to try to give the State of Israel legitimacy........Who and what really are the majority of the people who live in this State you call Israel.........because most are not true Jews in any way..steven

How was it illegal when they were invited first by the Ottomans in the mid 19C because the arab muslims refused to colonise the lands. Then in 1923 by the LoN the next legal sovereign land owners making them legal migrants. It was the arab muslims that flocked to the land with no controls over their immigration that are there illegally.

How about a link to your lebelous claim that the Jews bribed UN nations then, care to provide it before you are shown to be a two faced LYING POS ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDIST.

That is all part of International law and the Jews can allow who they want to enter Israel and become citizens. Why do you imply that it is against international laws and human rights to do so, is it because the population of Israel is rising and there wont be enough muslims in the world to attack in the numbers they prefer.


Show your evidence and not your usual crap lies youi trot out, or the links that dont support your claims.

All the claims are factual and are covered by evidence from many sources, and the Jews of today live partly in Israel and partly in other parts of the world. 50 years ago your people were demanding the Jews went to palestine where they belonged, now you are demanding they return to their lands in the west were YOU kicked them out.


you dont know what you want, but you want it now and you want someone else to do it for you

 

[Penelope]

There is a lot of contradictions about the supposed Mount Temple, when Maimonide visited Jerusalem he proposed that a temple in the city will unite the prayer of jews and this temple shouldn't built by humans but will come from heaven.

Concerning the place, some rabbis says that it's below the actual Alaqsa Mosque, others says it's above but other rabbis confirm that it's not in that place but near Jerusalem or in Nablus mount.

Professor in Tel Aviv university and Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues confirm that many biblical stories never happened, but were written by what he calls `a creative copywriter' to advance an ideological agenda.
Israel Finkelstein states:

"There is no archaeological evidence for it," he says. "This is something unexampled in history. I don't think there is any other place in the world where there was a city with such a wretched material infrastructure but which succeeded in creating such a sweeping movement in its favor as Jerusalem, which even in its time of greatness was a joke in comparison to the cities of Assyria, Babylon or Egypt. It was a typical mountain village. There is no magnificent finding, no gates of Nebuchadnezzar, no Assyrian reliefs, no Egyptian temples - nothing. Even the temple couldn't compete with the temples of Egypt and their splendor."

Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues are stirring controversy with contentions that many biblical stories never

Too bad we've found a coin from the First Temple period in the Temple Mount.

You Islamos all need to blow yourselves up for Allah before sunset. Get busy.

The Bible is so accurate that archeologists have it in one hand and a shovel in the other. The amount of historic information is invaluable. And they are dragging science along with them.
And as always, prophecy.... that God can, and even the best creative copywriter cannot.

Oh yes the fake exodus, certainty not as described in the OT. no they can't find any historical evidence of David or Solomon, they will fabricate some I'm sure. The bible is not prophecy, its typology. How do you think Cinderella fit into those slippers.

You are not keeping up with archeology:

Victory over the King of the House of David.

Whats that now a stone?

 

[Penelope]

....they really have NO claim to any part of the Holy Land as they have NO direct link to Abraham....just converts ...

Oh for the love of...

Do you have to make it this easy? How are Arab Muslims NOT "just" converts to the history and religious faith of Abraham?

The land already had a bride, the Palestinians, which are Christian, Jewish and Muslim, the ones who stayed, during and after the exile, after Greek and Roman empires, and throughout the Ottoman empire, those who worked the land.

 

[Penelope]

]

As I recall we kinda already discussed this one. There's nothing antique about any of the remaining itinerant Arab Muslim constructs on the Temple Mount and so it really wouldn't be violating any antiquities laws to just rip it down and let the native people ( the Judaic people ) build whatever they want there......

Seems to me another simple matter of native rights. Whats the colonists doing putting up new structures on the holly site of the native people anyway.

Rip down the dome and end the Arab Muslim colonial age in Israel

Their mosque has been there longer than any Hebrew temple, and is a historic place. Its just too darn bad the Hebrews didn't think enough of Palestine to defend it, isn't it.

It is surprising that a good Catholic as Penelope would deny the temple in Jerusalem. Didn't Jesus worship at the temple in Jerusalem?

A Portrait Of Jesus' World - Temple Culture | From Jesus To Christ - The First Christians | FRONTLINE | PBS

So he read the bible as well. Gentiles did not mix with Jews in the outer court. Jesus was not of that world, he had a big problem with the temple of his day and those in elite places who ran the temple, according to the scriptures.

 

[Penelope]

As I recall we kinda already discussed this one. There's nothing antique about any of the remaining itinerant Arab Muslim constructs on the Temple Mount and so it really wouldn't be violating any antiquities laws to just rip it down and let the native people ( the Judaic people ) build whatever they want there......

Seems to me another simple matter of native rights. Whats the colonists doing putting up new structures on the holly site of the native people anyway.

Rip down the dome and end the Arab Muslim colonial age in Israel

Their mosque has been there longer than any Hebrew temple, and is a historic place. Its just too darn bad the Hebrews didn't think enough of Palestine to defend it, isn't it.

It is surprising that a good Catholic as Penelope would deny the temple in Jerusalem. Didn't Jesus worship at the temple in Jerusalem?

A Portrait Of Jesus' World - Temple Culture | From Jesus To Christ - The First Christians | FRONTLINE | PBS

Worshiped, taught, and tried in the Temple. Nicodemus recorded every bit of it in real time.

Nicodemus didn't pen a word.

 

[Freeman]

There is a lot of contradictions about the supposed Mount Temple, when Maimonide visited Jerusalem he proposed that a temple in the city will unite the prayer of jews and this temple shouldn't built by humans but will come from heaven.

Concerning the place, some rabbis says that it's below the actual Alaqsa Mosque, others says it's above but other rabbis confirm that it's not in that place but near Jerusalem or in Nablus mount.

Professor in Tel Aviv university and Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues confirm that many biblical stories never happened, but were written by what he calls `a creative copywriter' to advance an ideological agenda.
Israel Finkelstein states:

"There is no archaeological evidence for it," he says. "This is something unexampled in history. I don't think there is any other place in the world where there was a city with such a wretched material infrastructure but which succeeded in creating such a sweeping movement in its favor as Jerusalem, which even in its time of greatness was a joke in comparison to the cities of Assyria, Babylon or Egypt. It was a typical mountain village. There is no magnificent finding, no gates of Nebuchadnezzar, no Assyrian reliefs, no Egyptian temples - nothing. Even the temple couldn't compete with the temples of Egypt and their splendor."

Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues are stirring controversy with contentions that many biblical stories never

It is a myth that Mohammed got on his horse and together they flew to some far off place (probably Timbuktu), but Freeman being a good Muslim believes this myth. Maybe Freeman can tell us why Jerusalem is never mentioned in the Koran but is mentioned so many times in the Bible. He can also tell us why the Muslims are destroying any Jewish antiquities found under the temple mount. It is pathetic how the Muslims are trying to disapprove any ancient Jewish history in Jerusalem.

The Destruction of the Temple Mount Antiquities, by Mark Ami-El

When Jerusalem was founded, Freeman's ancestors were living on the Saudi Peninsula like prehistoric cavemen.

Jerusalem

Where is the place of this supposed temple? is it near Jerusalem, Jersalem or in Nablus mount like your rabbis said?!
Archeologist Israel Finkelstein
"The "Solomonic" buildings excavated by biblical archaeologists over the past several decades at Hazor, Gezer, and Megiddo were not constructed in David and Solomon's time, he says, and so must have been built by kings of the ninth-century B.C.'s Omride dynasty, well after David and Solomon's reign."

National Geographic Magazine - NGM.com

"There is no archaeological evidence for it," he says. "This is something unexampled in history. I don't think there is any other place in the world where there was a city with such a wretched material infrastructure but which succeeded in creating such a sweeping movement in its favor as Jerusalem, which even in its time of greatness was a joke in comparison to the cities of Assyria, Babylon or Egypt. It was a typical mountain village. There is no magnificent finding, no gates of Nebuchadnezzar, no Assyrian reliefs, no Egyptian temples - nothing. Even the temple couldn't compete with the temples of Egypt and their splendor."

 

[aris2chat]

There is a lot of contradictions about the supposed Mount Temple, when Maimonide visited Jerusalem he proposed that a temple in the city will unite the prayer of jews and this temple shouldn't built by humans but will come from heaven.

Concerning the place, some rabbis says that it's below the actual Alaqsa Mosque, others says it's above but other rabbis confirm that it's not in that place but near Jerusalem or in Nablus mount.

Professor in Tel Aviv university and Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues confirm that many biblical stories never happened, but were written by what he calls `a creative copywriter' to advance an ideological agenda.
Israel Finkelstein states:

"There is no archaeological evidence for it," he says. "This is something unexampled in history. I don't think there is any other place in the world where there was a city with such a wretched material infrastructure but which succeeded in creating such a sweeping movement in its favor as Jerusalem, which even in its time of greatness was a joke in comparison to the cities of Assyria, Babylon or Egypt. It was a typical mountain village. There is no magnificent finding, no gates of Nebuchadnezzar, no Assyrian reliefs, no Egyptian temples - nothing. Even the temple couldn't compete with the temples of Egypt and their splendor."

Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues are stirring controversy with contentions that many biblical stories never

It is a myth that Mohammed got on his horse and together they flew to some far off place (probably Timbuktu), but Freeman being a good Muslim believes this myth. Maybe Freeman can tell us why Jerusalem is never mentioned in the Koran but is mentioned so many times in the Bible. He can also tell us why the Muslims are destroying any Jewish antiquities found under the temple mount. It is pathetic how the Muslims are trying to disapprove any ancient Jewish history in Jerusalem.

The Destruction of the Temple Mount Antiquities, by Mark Ami-El

When Jerusalem was founded, Freeman's ancestors were living on the Saudi Peninsula like prehistoric cavemen.

Jerusalem

Where is the place of this supposed temple? is it near Jerusalem, Jersalem or in Nablus mount like your rabbis said?!
Archeologist Israel Finkelstein
"The "Solomonic" buildings excavated by biblical archaeologists over the past several decades at Hazor, Gezer, and Megiddo were not constructed in David and Solomon's time, he says, and so must have been built by kings of the ninth-century B.C.'s Omride dynasty, well after David and Solomon's reign."

National Geographic Magazine - NGM.com

"There is no archaeological evidence for it," he says. "This is something unexampled in history. I don't think there is any other place in the world where there was a city with such a wretched material infrastructure but which succeeded in creating such a sweeping movement in its favor as Jerusalem, which even in its time of greatness was a joke in comparison to the cities of Assyria, Babylon or Egypt. It was a typical mountain village. There is no magnificent finding, no gates of Nebuchadnezzar, no Assyrian reliefs, no Egyptian temples - nothing. Even the temple couldn't compete with the temples of Egypt and their splendor."

but he wanted the mount under Israeli control

 

[Phoenall]

There is a lot of contradictions about the supposed Mount Temple, when Maimonide visited Jerusalem he proposed that a temple in the city will unite the prayer of jews and this temple shouldn't built by humans but will come from heaven.

Concerning the place, some rabbis says that it's below the actual Alaqsa Mosque, others says it's above but other rabbis confirm that it's not in that place but near Jerusalem or in Nablus mount.

Professor in Tel Aviv university and Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues confirm that many biblical stories never happened, but were written by what he calls `a creative copywriter' to advance an ideological agenda.
Israel Finkelstein states:

"There is no archaeological evidence for it," he says. "This is something unexampled in history. I don't think there is any other place in the world where there was a city with such a wretched material infrastructure but which succeeded in creating such a sweeping movement in its favor as Jerusalem, which even in its time of greatness was a joke in comparison to the cities of Assyria, Babylon or Egypt. It was a typical mountain village. There is no magnificent finding, no gates of Nebuchadnezzar, no Assyrian reliefs, no Egyptian temples - nothing. Even the temple couldn't compete with the temples of Egypt and their splendor."

Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues are stirring controversy with contentions that many biblical stories never

Too bad we've found a coin from the First Temple period in the Temple Mount.

You Islamos all need to blow yourselves up for Allah before sunset. Get busy.

The Bible is so accurate that archeologists have it in one hand and a shovel in the other. The amount of historic information is invaluable. And they are dragging science along with them.
And as always, prophecy.... that God can, and even the best creative copywriter cannot.

Oh yes the fake exodus, certainty not as described in the OT. no they can't find any historical evidence of David or Solomon, they will fabricate some I'm sure. The bible is not prophecy, its typology. How do you think Cinderella fit into those slippers.

You are not keeping up with archeology:

Victory over the King of the House of David.

Whats that now a stone?

We dont expect an illiterate muslim to understand that this proves the existence of the Jews, King David and the Temple. What do you muslims have to prove that mo'mad visited Jerusalem 50 years in the future on his flying horse other than your koran that as you say is not prophesy.

 

[Phoenall]

There is a lot of contradictions about the supposed Mount Temple, when Maimonide visited Jerusalem he proposed that a temple in the city will unite the prayer of jews and this temple shouldn't built by humans but will come from heaven.

Concerning the place, some rabbis says that it's below the actual Alaqsa Mosque, others says it's above but other rabbis confirm that it's not in that place but near Jerusalem or in Nablus mount.

Professor in Tel Aviv university and Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues confirm that many biblical stories never happened, but were written by what he calls `a creative copywriter' to advance an ideological agenda.
Israel Finkelstein states:

"There is no archaeological evidence for it," he says. "This is something unexampled in history. I don't think there is any other place in the world where there was a city with such a wretched material infrastructure but which succeeded in creating such a sweeping movement in its favor as Jerusalem, which even in its time of greatness was a joke in comparison to the cities of Assyria, Babylon or Egypt. It was a typical mountain village. There is no magnificent finding, no gates of Nebuchadnezzar, no Assyrian reliefs, no Egyptian temples - nothing. Even the temple couldn't compete with the temples of Egypt and their splendor."

Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues are stirring controversy with contentions that many biblical stories never

The views of one individual that mean nothing as best shown by mo'mad and his claim that seminal fluid comes from the spine. He also claimed that the earth was flat and the Sun revolved around it. The Greeks had already proven that it didnt of cource and that the earth was round.


You are so easily led when it comes to racially attacking the Jews, you will post any LIE and ignore the fallout when it is shown to be a LIE

It is a myth that Mohammed got on his horse and together they flew to some far off place (probably Timbuktu), but Freeman being a good Muslim believes this myth. Maybe Freeman can tell us why Jerusalem is never mentioned in the Koran but is mentioned so many times in the Bible. He can also tell us why the Muslims are destroying any Jewish antiquities found under the temple mount. It is pathetic how the Muslims are trying to disapprove any ancient Jewish history in Jerusalem.

The Destruction of the Temple Mount Antiquities, by Mark Ami-El

When Jerusalem was founded, Freeman's ancestors were living on the Saudi Peninsula like prehistoric cavemen.

Jerusalem

Where is the place of this supposed temple? is it near Jerusalem, Jersalem or in Nablus mount like your rabbis said?!
Archeologist Israel Finkelstein
"The "Solomonic" buildings excavated by biblical archaeologists over the past several decades at Hazor, Gezer, and Megiddo were not constructed in David and Solomon's time, he says, and so must have been built by kings of the ninth-century B.C.'s Omride dynasty, well after David and Solomon's reign."

National Geographic Magazine - NGM.com

"There is no archaeological evidence for it," he says. "This is something unexampled in history. I don't think there is any other place in the world where there was a city with such a wretched material infrastructure but which succeeded in creating such a sweeping movement in its favor as Jerusalem, which even in its time of greatness was a joke in comparison to the cities of Assyria, Babylon or Egypt. It was a typical mountain village. There is no magnificent finding, no gates of Nebuchadnezzar, no Assyrian reliefs, no Egyptian temples - nothing. Even the temple couldn't compete with the temples of Egypt and their splendor."

 

[aris2chat]

There is a lot of contradictions about the supposed Mount Temple, when Maimonide visited Jerusalem he proposed that a temple in the city will unite the prayer of jews and this temple shouldn't built by humans but will come from heaven.

Concerning the place, some rabbis says that it's below the actual Alaqsa Mosque, others says it's above but other rabbis confirm that it's not in that place but near Jerusalem or in Nablus mount.

Professor in Tel Aviv university and Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and his colleagues confirm that many biblical stories never happened, but were written by what he calls `a creative copywriter' to advance an ideological agenda.
Israel Finkelstein states:

Too bad we've found a coin from the First Temple period in the Temple Mount.

You Islamos all need to blow yourselves up for Allah before sunset. Get busy.

The Bible is so accurate that archeologists have it in one hand and a shovel in the other. The amount of historic information is invaluable. And they are dragging science along with them.
And as always, prophecy.... that God can, and even the best creative copywriter cannot.

Oh yes the fake exodus, certainty not as described in the OT. no they can't find any historical evidence of David or Solomon, they will fabricate some I'm sure. The bible is not prophecy, its typology. How do you think Cinderella fit into those slippers.

You are not keeping up with archeology:

Victory over the King of the House of David.

Whats that now a stone?

We dont expect an illiterate muslim to understand that this proves the existence of the Jews, King David and the Temple. What do you muslims have to prove that mo'mad visited Jerusalem 50 years in the future on his flying horse other than your koran that as you say is not prophesy.

How did Joseph's get all the way over to Nablus? How was Solomon born and became king? Why did Moses take the hebrew back to their homeland....................

Belief in the prophet of the jews and muslims but deny the temple where solomon built it

 

[Phoenall]

....they really have NO claim to any part of the Holy Land as they have NO direct link to Abraham....just converts ...

Oh for the love of...

Do you have to make it this easy? How are Arab Muslims NOT "just" converts to the history and religious faith of Abraham?

The land already had a bride, the Palestinians, which are Christian, Jewish and Muslim, the ones who stayed, during and after the exile, after Greek and Roman empires, and throughout the Ottoman empire, those who worked the land.

The same Jews that declared independence on the 22% of palestine allocated to them under international laws. As all the evidence provided shows the muslims were recent arrivals and came from the other arab league nations to swell the population of islamonazi's in the area. The law says that the arab muslims have no legal or moral right to the land and should leave

 

[Phoenall]

]

As I recall we kinda already discussed this one. There's nothing antique about any of the remaining itinerant Arab Muslim constructs on the Temple Mount and so it really wouldn't be violating any antiquities laws to just rip it down and let the native people ( the Judaic people ) build whatever they want there......

Seems to me another simple matter of native rights. Whats the colonists doing putting up new structures on the holly site of the native people anyway.

Rip down the dome and end the Arab Muslim colonial age in Israel

Their mosque has been there longer than any Hebrew temple, and is a historic place. Its just too darn bad the Hebrews didn't think enough of Palestine to defend it, isn't it.

It is surprising that a good Catholic as Penelope would deny the temple in Jerusalem. Didn't Jesus worship at the temple in Jerusalem?

A Portrait Of Jesus' World - Temple Culture | From Jesus To Christ - The First Christians | FRONTLINE | PBS

So he read the bible as well. Gentiles did not mix with Jews in the outer court. Jesus was not of that world, he had a big problem with the temple of his day and those in elite places who ran the temple, according to the scriptures.

According to the claims of the Romans who blamed the Jews for murdering their god. Take the bible with a pinch of salt as it is the work of dictators and not people who lived in palestine during the period of his life