Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Just curious who do you think is going to "enforce" these "stricter ethical standards?" and who's going to come up with these standards?
Wives are included in the banHis wife doesn't work in Govt. She got a job in the private sector.
Not constitutional.Wives are included in the ban
With strict reporting along the lines that you want for immediate family members
banning people from working is just silly.Wives are included in the ban
With strict reporting along the lines that you want for immediate family members
They do. There are no issues. This is all just demafascist trying to undermine the Judicial branch. This has been an on going agenda of the demafascist.Since nobody has oversight of SCOTUS, they need to keep their own house in order
The other judges need to enforce ethical standards
Lower court judges have ethical standards. SCOTUS should conform to those standards or stricter
And that's the goal of democrats. You can't change the makeup of the Court so you destroy it. Democrats love democracy until they don't love democracy.They have no standards that are enforced
If SCOTUS does not want someone else enforcing ethical standards on them, they need to do a better job of keeping their own house
The Roberts Court is losing the publics confidence
so tell sotomayor to recuse herself when shes paid millions by the groups she has to rule for,,They DO have an issue
The credibility of the Supreme Court
If they can’t convince the public that they are impartial, they have no purpose
well that's true...and that's why the demafacist are trying to make a story up here, that and their hate for the black man on the Court.They DO have an issue
The credibility of the Supreme Court
If they can’t convince the public that they are impartial, they have no purpose
well that's true...and that's why the demafacist are trying to make a story up here, that and their hate for the black man on the Court.
It's not their job to convience you they are impartial...the entire job is to follow the law, that's all they have to do. Let's face it, you don't really care either...that's why you said nothing when a Justice you like oversaw a case involving an employer of her's that paid her over $3 million, yet are trying to make hay over a family friend helping a Justice's great nephew with school....who has no case nor has had a case before the Court.
So that's sort of where your true colors are exposed.
I agreeso tell sotomayor to recuse herself when shes paid millions by the groups she has to rule for,,
thats where the real lack of trust comes from not this dumb shit being said about thomas,,
Oh my, (wringing my hands in ultimate worry and trepidation).It is not a made up story
It is a significant ethical violation
What's your solution?I agree
So should have Thomas recused himself in cases related to stolen elections
SCOTUS has ethical issues
Any judge at a lower level would have been held accountableOh my, (wringing my hands in ultimate worry and trepidation).
why?? he wasnt paid for anything and is not just allowed but required to use his POV using the constitution,, thats why judges exist,,I agree
So should have Thomas recused himself in cases related to stolen elections
SCOTUS has ethical issues
see post 61What's your solution?
whats there to hold him accountable for??Any judge at a lower level would have been held accountable
Not Thomas
”Somebody told me it was OK”
why?? he wasnt paid for anything and is not only allowed but required to use his POV using the constitution,, thats why judges exist,,
soto was not only paid but has a clear anti constitutional POV,,
haha no it's not...there is nothing unethical or remotely close about a family friend helping out with schooling for a Justice's grand nephew...in particular when the family friend has no business before the Court.It is not a made up story
It is a significant ethical violation
I've read both sides of the issue and from what I see its a nothing burger and broke no rules,,He received expensive gifts, real estate deals and vacations and never reported them
No one is forcing them to work for the government if they dont like the terms I have outlinedNot constitutional.
You can't force someone to do something just because their family member takes a job with the government.
